Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 98a · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.019 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 24 1981

Gurusiddappa Nurandappa UppIn and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-24-1981

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 98A; Karnataka Forest (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : ILR1981KAR751; [1982]49STC192(Kar)

forest contractors, the following questions of law arise for consideration : '(i) Whether section 98A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), inserted into it by the Karnataka Forest (Amendment) Act, 1976, with effect

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 1996

R. Pampapathi Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-02-1996

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines And Minerals (Regulation And Development) Act, 1956; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 98A

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1510

Geology Department, have called upon the Petitioners to pay Forest Development Tax under Section 98A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Forest Act' or 'State Act') from 1.4.1992 at the rate of Eight per

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2001

ScIndia Rubber Works Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-04-2001

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 98A

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD801

the Karnataka Forest Plantation Corporation to the private limited companies were 'forest produce' within the meaning of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, and hence liable to payment of Forest Development Tax under Section 98A thereof. In dealing with that question,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 24 1981

Gurusiddappa Nurandappa UppIn and Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and anr. ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-24-1981

Subject : Other TaxesConstitution

Acts : Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969 - Rules 85, 89 and 95A; Karnataka Forest Act, 1964 - Sections 26 and 98A; Constitution of India - Article 265

Reported in : AIR1981Kant216

by the Forest Contractors, the following questions of law, arise for consideration:(i) Whether Section 98A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter refer-9 red to as 'the Act') inserted into it by the Karnataka Forest (Amendment) 'Act, 1976 with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

the provision of Article 246, Entry-54 of Seventh Schedule, List I-Union List of Constitution of India, the Karnataka Forest Act 1963 and the provisions of the Forest [Conservation] Act 1980 [Central Act]. This Writ Petition is filed under Article … etc., This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to declare that section 98a of the Karnataka Forest Act 1993 and notification dt. 16.8.2008 published in the Official Gazette on 27.8.2008 vide

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 1994

Karnataka Forest Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. M/S. Contreads Priva ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-15-1994

Subject : Environment

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1964 - Sections 2(7); Karanataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 98A and 101A

Reported in : AIR1994SC2218; 1994(48)ECC74; 1994(73)ELT509(SC); JT1994(3)SC357; 1994(2)SCALE594; (1994)4SCC455; [1994]3SCR539; [1994]95STC561(SC)

Karnataka Forest Plantation Corporation to the private limited companies, were Forest Produce within the meaning of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and hence liable to payment of forest development tax under Section 98-A

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 11 1996

Muninagaiah Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-11-1996

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : ILR1996KAR2637; 1997(42)KarLJ129

in [1982] 49 STC 192, is wholly misplaced for two reasons, namely, (i) it pertains to interpretation of section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1964, wherein forest development tax was permitted to be levied in respect of forest … right to collect tamarind in specified forest areas through public auction as per the provisions of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1964 (For short 'the Forest Act') and the Rules framed thereunder. Mr. R. I. D'Sa, learned Additional Government

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Education

THAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DEMAND AND COLLECT FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX UNDER SECTION98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 ON THE VALUE OF MINERAL SOLD BY THE PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF THE MINING LEASES GRANTED UNDER THE … & R.2) ***** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION98 OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT1993AND NOTIFICATION DT. 16.8.2008 PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE ON278.2008 VIDE ANNEXURE B DOES

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1991

State of Karnataka Vs. Cantreads Private Limited

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-04-1991

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 2(7)

Reported in : ILR1991KAR1371; 1991(1)KarLJ500

sheets of various grades could be called forest produce within the meaning of Section 2(7) of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) as it stood prior to Amendment Act No. 10 of 1989.2. The … therefore without authority of law.Inasmuch as it is not a forest produce within the meaning of the Act, Section 98A of the Act is equally inapplicable. Therefore the levy of forest development tax as contemplated under the said

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2023

Sree Chathankulangara Bhagavathi Devaswom vs Nair Service Society

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-11-2023

obtaining prior sanction from the Commissioner of HR & CE and also under the Madras Preservation of Private Forest Act, 1949(MPPF Act). The term of lease was 36 years. Since the term of lease expired, the plaintiff is … The same reads thus,“There have been demands from the public for the amendment of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, on the ground that the provisions thereof are not really beneficial to the kudikidappukars and actual cultivators of … claim the benefit of fixity of tenure under Section 13 of the Act.24. The Land Tribunal relied on Section 98A of theKLR Act and held that the defendants are entitled for exemption from the ceiling provisions. It proceeded

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial