Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 98 · Page 1 of about 365 results (0.036 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

Jul 02 1996

R. Pampapathi Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-02-1996

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines And Minerals (Regulation And Development) Act, 1956; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 98A

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1510

Geology Department, have called upon the Petitioners to pay Forest Development Tax under Section 98A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Forest Act' or 'State Act') from 1.4.1992 at the rate of Eight per … of the Mines and Geology Department, have called upon the Petitioners to pay Forest Development Tax under Section 98A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Forest Act' or 'State Act') from 1.4.1992

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Education

THAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DEMAND AND COLLECT FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX UNDER SECTION98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 ON THE VALUE OF MINERAL SOLD BY THE PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF THE MINING LEASES GRANTED UNDER THE … writ petitions, petitioners have assailed Gazette Notification bearing No.248/FD2006dated 16/08/2008 issued by the State Government under -:132. :- Section 98-A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for the sake of brevity). (b)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

the provision of Article 246, Entry-54 of Seventh Schedule, List I-Union List of Constitution of India, the Karnataka Forest Act 1963 and the provisions of the Forest [Conservation] Act 1980 [Central Act]. This Writ Petition is filed under Article … India, praying to declare that the respondents are not entitled to demand and collect forest development tax under Section 98-A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 on the value of mineral sold by the petitioners in respect of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Mar 24 1981

Gurusiddappa Nurandappa UppIn and Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and anr. ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-24-1981

Subject : Other TaxesConstitution

Acts : Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969 - Rules 85, 89 and 95A; Karnataka Forest Act, 1964 - Sections 26 and 98A; Constitution of India - Article 265

Reported in : AIR1981Kant216

by the Forest Contractors, the following questions of law, arise for consideration:(i) Whether Section 98A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter refer-9 red to as 'the Act') inserted into it by the Karnataka Forest (Amendment) 'Act, 1976 with … 22 writ petitions filed by the Forest Contractors, the following questions of law, arise for consideration:(i) Whether Section 98A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter refer-9 red to as 'the Act') inserted into it by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 1979

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. Ayilammal Syamala Thamburatti and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-23-1979

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 to 24 and 29(2); Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 3(2), 8 and 8A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 2(9) and 2(14); Kerala Private Forests (Tribunal) Rules, 1972 - Rule 11

Reported in : AIR1980Ker82

of limitation, and the answer thereto depends on the applicability or otherwise of Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to this appeal.2. It is not disputed that the Act is a 'special or local law' falling within … the order is embodied in the same document. If so it is manifest that an order made under Section 98 of the Act, if it contains also the reasons for it, is a composite document satisfying the definition … J.1. This appeal is preferred under Section 8A of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971, (hereinafter, the Act) from the decision of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 1999

B.L. Diwakar Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-15-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 155(2), 190, 245, 468 and 482; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 8, 22, 24 and 73; Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976 - Sections 8; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2 and 3-A; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2001CriLJ305; ILR1999KAR4693; 2000(2)KarLJ283

that there is nothing wrong for taking cognizance under Sections 24(g) and (h) and 73(d) of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, Section 8 read with Section 22 of the Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976 and Section 2 read with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Smt Janaki Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION SPECIAL COURT, BENGALURU IN PROCEEDINGS DATED1611.1997 AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS33AND73KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963, RULE25 42, 43 KARNATAKA FOREST RULES, 1969, COLUMN NO.2 THE FOREST CONSERVATION ACT1980AND SECTIONS4AND5OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION … EHT LAND GRABBING SPECIAL COURT IN PROCEEDINGS No.LGC(P) NO.310/ 2017 AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION43]. OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PHOHIBITION ACT2011[ANNEXURE-B]. AND ETC. IN W.P. No.36459/2018: BETWEEN:1. . SRI C. GOVARDHAN REDDY … OF2011 DECIDED ON2302.2012. 97.(2015) 5 SCC1 SHREYA SINGHAL Vs. UNION OF INDIA. 98.AIR1986SC180 OLGA TELLIS AND OTHERS Vs. BOMBAY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND OTHERS99AIR2017SC5500: NIKESH TARACHAND

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021