Advanced Search Results

C. Rangappa Lachmiah and ors. Vs. the Range Forest Officer, Raichur an ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mysore Forest Rules, 1969 - Rules 163, 163(1), 163(2), 164 and 165; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Mysore Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 30, 33, 38, 50, 50(2), 54(3), 59, 97, 101 and 102; Banking Companies Act, 1949 - Sections 10; Mysore Forest Act, 1900; Rice Milling Industry (Regulation) Act, 1958 - Sections 5 and 6(1); Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 10(1)

Reported in : AIR1972Kant76; AIR1972Mys76

down Rules 163 and 164 of the Rules as being ultra vires of Section 50 of the Mysore Forest Act. 1963. (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and as being violative of clauses (g) and (f) of Article 19(1) … came into force on 1-1-1969. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sections 30, 33, 38, 50, 59, 97, 101 and 102 of the Act, the Government of Mysore made the Rules which came into force on

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the provision of Article 246, Entry-54 of Seventh Schedule, List I-Union List of Constitution of India, the Karnataka Forest Act 1963 and the provisions of the Forest [Conservation] Act 1980 [Central Act]. This Writ Petition is filed under Article … etc., This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to declare that section 98a of the Karnataka Forest Act 1993 and notification dt. 16.8.2008 published in the Official Gazette on 27.8.2008 … extracted as under: List I “ Union List - Entry 54, 92-A, 97 54. Regulation of mines and mineral development to the extent to which

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

THAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DEMAND AND COLLECT FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX UNDER SECTION98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 ON THE VALUE OF MINERAL SOLD BY THE PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF THE MINING LEASES GRANTED UNDER THE … & R.2) ***** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION98 OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT1993AND NOTIFICATION DT. 16.8.2008 PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE ON278.2008 VIDE ANNEXURE B DOES … extracted as under: “List I - Union List - Entry 54, 92-A, 97 54. Regulation of mines and mineral development to the extent to which

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

that petitioner's land W.P(C) No.26691 of 2010, etc. -:184. :- are lying contiguous to or encircled by reserved forest, vested forest or any other land owned by the Government does not furnish any valid reason for classification … relevant to note. The Apex Court in the said case had occasion to consider the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963. Section 6C was introduced with effect from 07.07.1979. W.P(C) No.26691 of 2010, etc. -:255. :- Section 74 of the

Janu Chandra Waghmare and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 31, 31-B, 31(2), 228A, 245, 246, 246(3), 248, 255, 301 to 307, 366, 367 and 368; Constitution of India (40th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(6), 2(7), 3, 4 to 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16, 16(1) and 17; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Sale of Trees by Occupants belonging to Scheduled Tribes (Regulation) Act, 1959 - Sections 5 and 6; Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 2(5), 2(6), 2(7), 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3

Reported in : AIR1978Bom119; (1977)79BOMLR499

was passed on 28-10-1974. On 14-5-1975 the State Government issued a notification under Section 35(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 in respect of the 1st petitioner's said private forest.4, Further, during the pendency of the petition the … as it then stood. On 28-3-1974 permission was granted by the Tehsildar to the 1st petitioner for felling 9719 teak trees. The 1st petitioner being an Adivasi, the said agreement for sale required permission/approval of the Collector

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi /acb

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … the order of the Special Judge insofar as Spl.CC.No.6/2014. B.3. W.P.No.19178/2021 (Spl.CC.No.21/2014) 97. The petitioner/accused No.2 has sought for setting aside of the order dated … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … the order of the Special Judge insofar as Spl.CC.No.6/2014. B.3. W.P.No.19178/2021 (Spl.CC.No.21/2014) 97. The petitioner/accused No.2 has sought for setting aside of the order dated … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … the order of the Special Judge insofar as Spl.CC.No.6/2014. B.3. W.P.No.19178/2021 (Spl.CC.No.21/2014) 97. The petitioner/accused No.2 has sought for setting aside of the order dated … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Sri.s. Muthaiah Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … the order of the Special Judge insofar as Spl.CC.No.6/2014. B.3. W.P.No.19178/2021 (Spl.CC.No.21/2014) 97. The petitioner/accused No.2 has sought for setting aside of the order dated … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

The Dy. Commissioner and Another Vs. Gidda and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227; Karnataka (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955 ; Mysore (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955. ; Mysore Forest Regulation, 1900 - Section 35 (1)(3), 2(2), 33; Karnataka Forest Act 1963 - Section 117, 106, 6; KCRIA Act - Section 3, 9(1), 3(g), 3(b), 7, 8; Karnataka Land Grant Rules

Reported in : 2012ILR(Kar)2275

to forests and forest produce in the State of Karnataka. In that regard, a reference to the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 would indicate that the term ‘Reserved Forest’ is contained therein for the first time and Chapter-II relates to … it is contended that the notification dated 06.03.1928 is not valid inasmuch as the same is issued under Section 35 (iii) of the Regulations. It is further contended that the said Regulation only provides for Regulation of