Advanced Search Results

T John vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Jamma Malai lands fall within the ambit of “statutory forest” under the scheme of the - 13 -Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. The finding appears to have been premised on the historical character of such lands, their alleged forest attributes, … land for the cultivation of tea, coffee, spices, rubber, palms, oil- - 95 -bearing plants, horticultural crops or medicinal plants.23.25. On this basis, it is … them to file objections and challenge any adverse action taken pursuant to the report.13. The Deputy Commissioner invoked Section 136 ofthe Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, and directed deletion of the name of Petitioner No.1 from revenue

Chikkusappa Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960; Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 - Rules 17, 32, 32(1), 42, 44 and 49; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 15, 38, 70, 95, 95(1), 95(2) 95(3), 95(4) and 96; Constitution of India - Articles 141, 226 and 227; Explosives Act, 1884; Mining Act; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Reported in : 2006(3)KarLJ64

was obstruction on the part of the officials of the State Government whether be in the department of forest, mines and geology or revenue, if the right of the petitioners to carry on their quarrying of granite; … informed that they can get mineral dispatch permits only after securing permission in terms of the provisions of Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short, 'the Act'), a permission where under the petitioners are

Mr. Muzammil Pasha vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

CONVICTING THE APPELLANTS/ ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHALBE UNDER SECTION 379 IPC R/W. SECTION 87 OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 AND ETC.,THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR DICTATING JUDGMENTTHIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … cognizance of the said offences by the court of competent jurisdiction." 88 95. Clearly, the sanction order speaks for itself and the learned Special Judge … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi /acb

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … cognizance of the said offences by the court of competent jurisdiction." 88 95. Clearly, the sanction order speaks for itself and the learned Special Judge … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … cognizance of the said offences by the court of competent jurisdiction." 88 95. Clearly, the sanction order speaks for itself and the learned Special Judge … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Sri.s. Muthaiah Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … cognizance of the said offences by the court of competent jurisdiction." 88 95. Clearly, the sanction order speaks for itself and the learned Special Judge … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Smt R H Usha vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

BY THE R1 AUTHORITY, IN THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN UNDER SECTION 64-A(3) OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 (ACT FOR BREVITY) VIDE APPEAL NO. 361 OF 202223 AS PER ANNEXURE-A; ii) SETTING SIDE THE IMPUGNEDORDER DATED … the Mysore Gazette."61. The Government of Mysore published in the Mysore Gazette dt. 11/6/1896 Notification No. 10407 FT.F-153- 95 of 29/5/1896 which reads thus:"Under the provisions of Sec.9 of the Forest Rules of 1878, the Government of

Subray Narayan Prabhu Dessai and Another Vs. Government of Goa, Throug ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

section 14(3), Section 14(4), Section 95, Section 98, Section 105, Section 112, Section 113, Section 115 – Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 58 - Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34 - Forest Act, 1927 - Section 4, … is also the case of the defendant that notification in that regard was first issued on 30/6/1988 under Forest Act in Official Gazette and then further notification u/s 6 was also issued. It is the case of the

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

vs. Cantreads Pri­ vate Limited and others (1994) 4 SCC 455. This Court had occasion to consider Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. Caoutchouc or latex covers natural covering sheets of various grades or not, was the question under consider­ ation. … Pradesh, State of Uttarakhand and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by … by Article 372 of the Constitution and remained unaffected by Article 254....” 95. In Pankajakshi (Dead) Through Legal Representatives and others vs. Chandrika and others,