Advanced Search Results

Janu Chandra Waghmare and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 31, 31-B, 31(2), 228A, 245, 246, 246(3), 248, 255, 301 to 307, 366, 367 and 368; Constitution of India (40th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(6), 2(7), 3, 4 to 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16, 16(1) and 17; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Sale of Trees by Occupants belonging to Scheduled Tribes (Regulation) Act, 1959 - Sections 5 and 6; Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 2(5), 2(6), 2(7), 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3

Reported in : AIR1978Bom119; (1977)79BOMLR499

was passed on 28-10-1974. On 14-5-1975 the State Government issued a notification under Section 35(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 in respect of the 1st petitioner's said private forest.4, Further, during the pendency of the petition the … Constitution as also on several decisions of Australian High Court and Privy Council on similar provisions contained in Section 92 of the Australian Constitution.40. On the other hand, counsel for the State of Maharashtra and other respondents have

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

vs. Cantreads Pri­ vate Limited and others (1994) 4 SCC 455. This Court had occasion to consider Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. Caoutchouc or latex covers natural covering sheets of various grades or not, was the question under consider­ ation. … Pradesh, State of Uttarakhand and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by … and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and and wild 92 life of the country.” 113. Article 51A of the Constitution lays down

P. Mohammed Ali and ors. Vs. the Forest Range Officer and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : EnvironmentCriminal

Acts : Kerala Forest Act - Sections 2; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 2(7)

Reported in : 1993CriLJ2019

Matched in: Parties P. Mohammed Ali and ors. Vs. the Forest Range Officer and anr.

Karnataka State Forest Industries Corporation Vs. Indian Rocks

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 21(4), 50 and 62; Indian Telegraph Act; Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 - Rules 42 and 43(6); Indian Telegraph Rules; Karnataka Forest Rules, 1963; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 136, 162 and 226

Reported in : AIR2009SC684; 2008(2)CTLJ465(SC); JT2008(12)SC388; 2009(2)KarLJ193; (2009)1SCC150

Matched in: Parties Karnataka State Forest Industries Corporation Vs. Indian Rocks

Smt. G. Kalamani Vs. the Chief Conservator of Forests in Karnataka and ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Forests Act, 1964 - Sections 2(7); Karnataka Forests Rules, 1969 - Rule 144; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 2(7)

Reported in : AIR1995Kant211; ILR1994KAR951; 1994(2)KarLJ418

short Notes. Item No. 108 page 92)explaining the scope of Section 2(7) of the Acthas held as follows:Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. Section 2(7) -- Soapnut, if Forest Produce; Assuming that soapnut is a fruit or other part or produce of

Anusuya Devi Vs. K.Panchanathan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Section 138; Limitation Act - Section 5; Specific Relief Act 1963 - Section 20

in the context of Kerala Land Reforms Act, and the Kerala Private Forest (Vesting and Assignment) Act. The defendants never responded to the letter-Exhibit A2 … exercised according to settled principles of law and not arbitrarily as adumbrated under S.20 of the Specific Relief Act 1963; Under S.20, the Court is not bound to grant the relief just because there was valid agreement of … the same, the learned counsel for the respondents/plaintiffs submitted that Ex.A1 is a registered sale agreement. As per Section 92 of Indian Evidence Act, the appellant/defendant is not entitled to give evidence gainst Ex.A1, which is a registered

Ratheesh a.C. vs Travancore Devaswom Board

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ext.P1order was passed by the Commissioner for sanction to lease 600acres of forest land belonging to Emoor Bhagavathy Devaswom. The said order was passed in … not very vigilant in exercising the power the interest of the Devaswomshould suffer. Section 10 of the Limitation Act, 1963, provides no period of limitation for a suit against a person in whom the trust property has become … India and there is need to look into this aspect by the Central Government, apart from State Governments. Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 permits a court also to issue direction for making a scheme

Chandradathan vs Thiruvallur Grama Panchayath

Court : Kerala

Ext.P1order was passed by the Commissioner for sanction to lease 600acres of forest land belonging to Emoor Bhagavathy Devaswom. The said order was passed in … not very vigilant in exercising the power the interest of the Devaswomshould suffer. Section 10 of the Limitation Act, 1963, provides no period of limitation for a suit against a person in whom the trust property has become … India and there is need to look into this aspect by the Central Government, apart from State Governments. Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 permits a court also to issue direction for making a scheme

Suo Motu vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

was passed by the Commissioner for sanction to lease 600 acres of forest land belonging to Emoor Bhagavathy Devaswom. The said order was passed in … very vigilant in exercising the power the interest of the Devaswom should suffer. Section 10 of the Limitation Act, 1963, provides no period of limitation for a suit against a person in whom the trust property has become … India and there is need to look into this aspect by the Central Government, apart from State Governments. Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 permits a court also to issue direction for making a scheme

Travancore Devaswom Board vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Ext.P1order was passed by the Commissioner for sanction to lease 600acres of forest land belonging to Emoor Bhagavathy Devaswom. The said order was passed in … very vigilant in exercising the power the interest of the Devaswom should suffer. Section 10 of the Limitation Act, 1963, provides no period of limitation for a suit against a person in whom the trust property has become … India and there is need to look into this aspect by the Central Government, apart from State Governments. Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 permits a court also to issue direction for making a scheme