Advanced Search Results

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … V-19 Volume 71 to 80 9. D139 to D140 Volume 81 to 90 10. D141 to D156 Volume 91 to 101 58. Insofar as the … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi /acb

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … V-19 Volume 71 to 80 9. D139 to D140 Volume 81 to 90 10. D141 to D156 Volume 91 to 101 58. Insofar as the … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … V-19 Volume 71 to 80 9. D139 to D140 Volume 81 to 90 10. D141 to D156 Volume 91 to 101 58. Insofar as the … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Sri.s. Muthaiah Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … V-19 Volume 71 to 80 9. D139 to D140 Volume 81 to 90 10. D141 to D156 Volume 91 to 101 58. Insofar as the … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Central Bureau of Investigation, Bangalore Vs. Kenche Mahesh Kumar

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

under Section 21 r/w 4(1), 4(1)(A) and 23 of MMDR Act, 1957 and under Section 24 of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963.) ORDER ON THE POINT RAISED 1. The point to be considered in this Criminal Petition is as under: … RAISED 1. The point to be considered in this Criminal Petition is as under: Whether the computation of 90 days, as contemplated under Section 167 of the Cr.PC., would commence from the date the body warrant is

Mspl Limited, Rep by Its Executive Director. Vs. the State of Karnatak ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Mines And Minerals

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 226, 227; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 59, 30, 7A(1), 60, 24A95); Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 30, 11(2), 17A

Reported in : 2009(1)KCCR5(SN)

context of the various statutory enactments such as Forest Act, 1927 [and in the case of Karnataka, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 also] Forest [Conservation] Act, 1980, Environment [Protection] Act, 1986, Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 and the supporting Rules both … before the chairman and the members present at the meeting, that almost 90% of the recommendations made by the NEERI in its report were already … central government in terms of the communication dated 6-12-2004 [copy at Annexure-K to the writ petition] as per Section 5(1) of the Act and as no more land is available for grant of lease in favour of

Mukund Shivaram Patil and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Its S ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) (Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 7, 7(2), 15, 22A and 22A(4); ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4, 5, 12, 14, 29 and 29(2); Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 150(2); Maharashtra Land Revenue (Register of Mutations) Rules - Rules 14 and 24; Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18 and 19; Indian Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 35 and 35(3); Land Acquisition Act - Sections 18(1)

Reported in : 2001(4)BomCR700; (2001)4BOMLR418; 2001(4)MhLj656

and vested in the State Government, shall cease to be a reserved forest within the meaning of the Forest Act, be deemed to have been regranted to the owner and shall be revested in him, subject, however, to … following grounds : Firstly, that the Additional Commissioner has completely overlooked the provisions of section 29 of the'Limitation Act, 1963. He contended that the Act of 1975 is special law and since there is no provision in the … It is further held thai the Collector before whom the appeal was preferred by the appellant therein under section 90 of the Act not being a Court, the Limitation Act, as such, had no applicability to the proceedings

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

vs. Cantreads Pri­ vate Limited and others (1994) 4 SCC 455. This Court had occasion to consider Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. Caoutchouc or latex covers natural covering sheets of various grades or not, was the question under consider­ ation. … Pradesh, State of Uttarakhand and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by … of mines and the development of minerals to the extent hereinafter provided.” 90. After noticing the above declaration, this Court laid down following:76. "It does

Karnataka State Forest Industries Corporation Vs. Indian Rocks

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 21(4), 50 and 62; Indian Telegraph Act; Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 - Rules 42 and 43(6); Indian Telegraph Rules; Karnataka Forest Rules, 1963; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 136, 162 and 226

Reported in : AIR2009SC684; 2008(2)CTLJ465(SC); JT2008(12)SC388; 2009(2)KarLJ193; (2009)1SCC150

unless it is covered by transit pass in accordance with the rules under Section 50 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. If any problems arise while lifting the blocks from site, necessary assistance will be provided if need be

Smt Janaki Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION SPECIAL COURT, BENGALURU IN PROCEEDINGS DATED1611.1997 AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS33AND73KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963, RULE25 42, 43 KARNATAKA FOREST RULES, 1969, COLUMN NO.2 THE FOREST CONSERVATION ACT1980AND SECTIONS4AND5OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION … EHT LAND GRABBING SPECIAL COURT IN PROCEEDINGS No.LGC(P) NO.310/ 2017 AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION43]. OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PHOHIBITION ACT2011[ANNEXURE-B]. AND ETC. IN W.P. No.36459/2018: BETWEEN:1. . SRI C. GOVARDHAN REDDY … INSPECTOR OF POLICE. 89.CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1293 OF2006 KALYANI BASKAR Vs. M.S. SAMPORNAM. 90.AIR1957SC540 GARIKAPATI VEERAYA Vs. N. SUBBIAH CHOUDHRY AND OTHER911993 SUPP(1) SCC962) : IN