Advanced Search Results
K. Ekambaram Reddy S/O K. Doraswamy Reddy Vs. Deputy Conservator of Fo ...
Karnataka
Apr-17-2007
Criminal
Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 2(5), 2(7), 62, 62(1), 62(3), 63, 71A, 71G, 85 and 86; Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976 - Sections 8 and 22; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 9 and 51; Trees Act; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2 and 3; Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969
ILR2007KAR3197; 2007(5)KarLJ112; 2007(4)AIRKarR81
FOC No. 32/2006-07 against certain persons for the offences punishable under Sections 85 and 86 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (for short 'Forest Act') and Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969 (for short 'Forest Rules') and Section 8 r/w Section … 22 of the Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976 (for short 'Trees Act') and under Section 2(16) and Section 9 r/w Section 51 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (for short 'Wild Life Act') and Section 2
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Dy. Commissioner and Another Vs. Gidda and Others
Karnataka
Apr-20-2012
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227; Karnataka (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955 ; Mysore (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955. ; Mysore Forest Regulation, 1900 - Section 35 (1)(3), 2(2), 33; Karnataka Forest Act 1963 - Section 117, 106, 6; KCRIA Act - Section 3, 9(1), 3(g), 3(b), 7, 8; Karnataka Land Grant Rules
2012ILR(Kar)2275
to forests and forest produce in the State of Karnataka. In that regard, a reference to the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 would indicate that the term ‘Reserved Forest’ is contained therein for the first time and Chapter-II relates to … it is contended that the notification dated 06.03.1928 is not valid inasmuch as the same is issued under Section 35 (iii) of the Regulations. It is further contended that the said Regulation only provides for Regulation of … India, with a prayer to quash vide Anx. A1 dated 25.11.1993. Anx. 92 dated 30.09.93. Anx.A3 dated 28.10.93. Anx. A4 dated 14.09.93. Anx. A5 dated
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Kerala and anr. Vs. Ayilammal Syamala Thamburatti and ors.
Kerala
Nov-23-1979
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 to 24 and 29(2); Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 3(2), 8 and 8A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 2(9) and 2(14); Kerala Private Forests (Tribunal) Rules, 1972 - Rule 11
AIR1980Ker82
George Vadakkel, J.1. This appeal is preferred under Section 8A of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971, (hereinafter, the Act) from the decision of the Forest Tribunal, palghat, under Section … of limitation, and the answer thereto depends on the applicability or otherwise of Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to this appeal.2. It is not disputed that the Act is a 'special or local law' falling within … 129 at pp.. 160-61).It was further stated therein that since under Section 90 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the Election Tribunal is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi
Karnataka
Aug-04-2023
Education
UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … 8. W.P.No.16605/2018 Writ of certiorari quashing the proceedings in Spl.C.C.No.135/2013 (R.C.No.15-A/2012) ANALYSIS:- 9. The petitioner is stated to be a Forest Officer of I.F.S. Cadre … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi /acb
Karnataka
Aug-04-2023
Education
UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … 8. W.P.No.16605/2018 Writ of certiorari quashing the proceedings in Spl.C.C.No.135/2013 (R.C.No.15-A/2012) ANALYSIS:- 9. The petitioner is stated to be a Forest Officer of I.F.S. Cadre … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri S Muthaiah Vs. State By
Karnataka
Aug-04-2023
Education
UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … 8. W.P.No.16605/2018 Writ of certiorari quashing the proceedings in Spl.C.C.No.135/2013 (R.C.No.15-A/2012) ANALYSIS:- 9. The petitioner is stated to be a Forest Officer of I.F.S. Cadre … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri.s. Muthaiah Vs. State
Karnataka
Aug-04-2023
Education
UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … 8. W.P.No.16605/2018 Writ of certiorari quashing the proceedings in Spl.C.C.No.135/2013 (R.C.No.15-A/2012) ANALYSIS:- 9. The petitioner is stated to be a Forest Officer of I.F.S. Cadre … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...
Karnataka
Dec-03-2015
Land Acquisition
the provision of Article 246, Entry-54 of Seventh Schedule, List I-Union List of Constitution of India, the Karnataka Forest Act 1963 and the provisions of the Forest [Conservation] Act 1980 [Central Act]. This Writ Petition is filed under Article … any tax on royalty which would also result in increasing of royalty payable under the Act was violative Section 9(2) of MMDR Act. Therefore, the petitioners therein, who were the lessees sought a declaration that FDT was not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...
Karnataka
Dec-03-2015
Education
THAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DEMAND AND COLLECT FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX UNDER SECTION98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 ON THE VALUE OF MINERAL SOLD BY THE PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF THE MINING LEASES GRANTED UNDER THE … any tax on royalty which would also result in increasing of royalty payable under the Act was violative Section 9(2) of MMDR Act. Therefore, the petitioners therein, who were the lessees sought a declaration that FDT was not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDirk India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mahagenco
Mumbai
Mar-08-2007
ArbitrationCivil
Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Arbitration Act - Sections 9 and 11; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 41 and 42; Environmental Protection Act; Environmental Protection Rules
2007(5)BomCR207
issued by the Government of India in the Ministry of Environment and Forest inter alia setting out guide-lines for the disposal of the fly ash. … Arbitral Tribunal. Pending the appointment of Arbitral Tribunal and its decision, the petitioner has filed this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act for interim reliefs, includingi) an order restraining the respondent from giving effect to the … negative injunction restraining sale to a third party could be granted under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.8. In order to support his submissions, Mr. Dada referred to and relied upon the following decisions:(i) (Sky Petroleum
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »