Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 9 · Page 1 of about 1,599 results (0.063 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 17 2007

K. Ekambaram Reddy S/O K. Doraswamy Reddy Vs. Deputy Conservator of Fo ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-17-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 2(5), 2(7), 62, 62(1), 62(3), 63, 71A, 71G, 85 and 86; Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976 - Sections 8 and 22; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 9 and 51; Trees Act; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2 and 3; Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969

Reported in : ILR2007KAR3197; 2007(5)KarLJ112; 2007(4)AIRKarR81

FOC No. 32/2006-07 against certain persons for the offences punishable under Sections 85 and 86 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (for short 'Forest Act') and Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969 (for short 'Forest Rules') and Section 8 r/w Section … 22 of the Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976 (for short 'Trees Act') and under Section 2(16) and Section 9 r/w Section 51 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (for short 'Wild Life Act') and Section 2

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2012

The Dy. Commissioner and Another Vs. Gidda and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-20-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227; Karnataka (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955 ; Mysore (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955. ; Mysore Forest Regulation, 1900 - Section 35 (1)(3), 2(2), 33; Karnataka Forest Act 1963 - Section 117, 106, 6; KCRIA Act - Section 3, 9(1), 3(g), 3(b), 7, 8; Karnataka Land Grant Rules

Reported in : 2012ILR(Kar)2275

to forests and forest produce in the State of Karnataka. In that regard, a reference to the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 would indicate that the term ‘Reserved Forest’ is contained therein for the first time and Chapter-II relates to … it is contended that the notification dated 06.03.1928 is not valid inasmuch as the same is issued under Section 35 (iii) of the Regulations. It is further contended that the said Regulation only provides for Regulation of … India, with a prayer to quash vide Anx. A1 dated 25.11.1993. Anx. 92 dated 30.09.93. Anx.A3 dated 28.10.93. Anx. A4 dated 14.09.93. Anx. A5 dated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 1979

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. Ayilammal Syamala Thamburatti and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-23-1979

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 to 24 and 29(2); Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 3(2), 8 and 8A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 2(9) and 2(14); Kerala Private Forests (Tribunal) Rules, 1972 - Rule 11

Reported in : AIR1980Ker82

George Vadakkel, J.1. This appeal is preferred under Section 8A of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971, (hereinafter, the Act) from the decision of the Forest Tribunal, palghat, under Section … of limitation, and the answer thereto depends on the applicability or otherwise of Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to this appeal.2. It is not disputed that the Act is a 'special or local law' falling within … 129 at pp.. 160-61).It was further stated therein that since under Section 90 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the Election Tribunal is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 04 2023

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … 8. W.P.No.16605/2018 Writ of certiorari quashing the proceedings in Spl.C.C.No.135/2013 (R.C.No.15-A/2012) ANALYSIS:- 9. The petitioner is stated to be a Forest Officer of I.F.S. Cadre … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2023

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi /acb

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … 8. W.P.No.16605/2018 Writ of certiorari quashing the proceedings in Spl.C.C.No.135/2013 (R.C.No.15-A/2012) ANALYSIS:- 9. The petitioner is stated to be a Forest Officer of I.F.S. Cadre … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2023

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … 8. W.P.No.16605/2018 Writ of certiorari quashing the proceedings in Spl.C.C.No.135/2013 (R.C.No.15-A/2012) ANALYSIS:- 9. The petitioner is stated to be a Forest Officer of I.F.S. Cadre … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2023

Sri.s. Muthaiah Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … 8. W.P.No.16605/2018 Writ of certiorari quashing the proceedings in Spl.C.C.No.135/2013 (R.C.No.15-A/2012) ANALYSIS:- 9. The petitioner is stated to be a Forest Officer of I.F.S. Cadre … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

the provision of Article 246, Entry-54 of Seventh Schedule, List I-Union List of Constitution of India, the Karnataka Forest Act 1963 and the provisions of the Forest [Conservation] Act 1980 [Central Act]. This Writ Petition is filed under Article … any tax on royalty which would also result in increasing of royalty payable under the Act was violative Section 9(2) of MMDR Act. Therefore, the petitioners therein, who were the lessees sought a declaration that FDT was not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Education

THAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DEMAND AND COLLECT FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX UNDER SECTION98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 ON THE VALUE OF MINERAL SOLD BY THE PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF THE MINING LEASES GRANTED UNDER THE … any tax on royalty which would also result in increasing of royalty payable under the Act was violative Section 9(2) of MMDR Act. Therefore, the petitioners therein, who were the lessees sought a declaration that FDT was not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 2007

Dirk India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mahagenco

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-08-2007

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Arbitration Act - Sections 9 and 11; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 41 and 42; Environmental Protection Act; Environmental Protection Rules

Reported in : 2007(5)BomCR207

issued by the Government of India in the Ministry of Environment and Forest inter alia setting out guide-lines for the disposal of the fly ash. … Arbitral Tribunal. Pending the appointment of Arbitral Tribunal and its decision, the petitioner has filed this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act for interim reliefs, includingi) an order restraining the respondent from giving effect to the … negative injunction restraining sale to a third party could be granted under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.8. In order to support his submissions, Mr. Dada referred to and relied upon the following decisions:(i) (Sky Petroleum

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial