Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 85 · Page 1 of about 424 results (0.028 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 04 2004

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. Popular Estates and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-04-2004

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : The Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 3, 3(2), 6 and 8; Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Sections 81 and 85(9A); Kerala Land Reforms (Ceiling) Rules, 1970 - Rule 10

Reported in : 2004(9)SCALE263; (2004)12SCC434

would be a piece of evidence, but it cannot be treated as binding on the authorities under the Forest Act. 12. Learned counsel for the respondents produced before us copies of registered deeds and contended that these formed … mention here that the respondents had filed a draft statement under the provisions of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963. Section 81 of this Act inter alia exempts private forests and plantations. Rule 10 of the Kerala Land Reforms … challenge the declaration made by the Taluk Land Board, proceedings under Section 85(9A) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 had been initiated for reopening

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2007

K. Ekambaram Reddy S/O K. Doraswamy Reddy Vs. Deputy Conservator of Fo ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-17-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 2(5), 2(7), 62, 62(1), 62(3), 63, 71A, 71G, 85 and 86; Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976 - Sections 8 and 22; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 9 and 51; Trees Act; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2 and 3; Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969

Reported in : ILR2007KAR3197; 2007(5)KarLJ112; 2007(4)AIRKarR81

Matched in: Parties K. Ekambaram Reddy S/O K. Doraswamy Reddy Vs. Deputy Conservator of Forest, Bangalore Urban Division and Range Forest Officer, Division

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Education

THAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DEMAND AND COLLECT FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX UNDER SECTION98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 ON THE VALUE OF MINERAL SOLD BY THE PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF THE MINING LEASES GRANTED UNDER THE … the Rules. The methods of selling forest produce are given in Rule 85 and related provisions which read as under:- “85. Methods of selling forest … & R.2) ***** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION98 OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT1993AND NOTIFICATION DT. 16.8.2008 PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE ON278.2008 VIDE ANNEXURE B DOES

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional Manager K. Praveen Kumar and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, by its Secretary to the Forest, Ecology and Environment Department and Others

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2017

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-15-2017

Subject : Right to Information

vs. Cantreads Pri­ vate Limited and others (1994) 4 SCC 455. This Court had occasion to consider Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. Caoutchouc or latex covers natural covering sheets of various grades or not, was the question under consider­ ation. … Pradesh, State of Uttarakhand and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by … in fact by a table which itself has been noted in paragraph 85 of the judgment has mentioned the income and expenditure related to transit

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 2003

State of Kerala and ors. Vs. K. Sarojini Amma and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-14-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Sections 2(47), 81, 81(1), 82, 82(4), 83, 84, 85, 87 and 103; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971; Constitution of India - Article 227; Madras Preservation of Private Forests Act, 1949 - Sections 1(2), 2 and 3(1); State Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 5(2) and 119; Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1964; Kerala Adoption of Laws Order, 1956

Reported in : AIR2003SC4475; JT2003(Suppl2)SC366; 2004(1)KLT354(SC); 2003(8)SCALE591; (2003)8SCC526

State Reorganisation Act, 1956 (Central Act 37 of 1956) -(i) any land which the Madras Preservation of Private Forest Act, 1949 (Madras Act XXVII of 1949) applied immediately before the appointed day excluding - (A) land which are … the High Court made in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction under Section 103 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (for short 'the Act'). The Taluk Land Board directed the respondents to surrender a total extent of about … a temporary nature) it cannot be taken into account for the purpose of determining the ceiling area under Section 85 whatever may have happened to its nature after 1.4.1964 and before 1.1.1970 and even thereafter, subject of course

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 1976

State of Maharashtra Vs. Yeshwant Parasharam Sawant

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-03-1976

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1977CriLJ1477

Inspector Khamkar (P.W. 12) received the enquiry papers from the Revenue and Forest Departments of the State Government with a direction that he should lodge … of 317 days, having regard to the period of limitation laid down under Article 114(a) of the Limitation Act, 1963, the State filed an application being Criminal Application No. 577 of 1973 for condonation of delay, stating that … because the lands were growing grass naturally.12. The third set of proceedings arose out of a reference Under Section 85 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, in civil suit No. 69 of 1966 filed by Kirtane

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 13 2023

The Nellimpathy Tea & Produce Co.Ltd vs State of Kerala,Rep;by Pr; ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-13-2023

SRI.B.J.JOHN PRAKASH SRI.MATHEWS K.UTHUPPACHAN SRI.TERRY V.JAMES SRI.TOM THOMAS KAKKUZHIYIL RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, FOREST DEPARTMENT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014 2 THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS (CUSTODIAN-BIO-DIVERSITY ECOLOGICALLY FRAGILE, LANDS), FOREST HEADQUARTERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 … DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:JUDGMENTDated this the 13th day of June, 2023 Petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act,1956 and was holding a property, commonly known as Manalaroo Estate having an extent of 2553 Acres equivalent to … proceedings were not finalized under the provisions of Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963.2. United Planters Association of Southern India videcommunication dated 10.2.1998, informed that the … paying plantation tax as per Exhibits P3, P4 and P5. Proceeding under Section 85(A) of Kerala Land Reforms Act was initiated forsurrendering the land, evident

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2018

Kishore Kumar vs.high Court of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-29-2018

Subject : Education

7 of 19 15. The petitioner argues that DHC deemed the above to be a query pertaining to Section 85 of the Evidence Act, 1872 and indicated that option (2) is the correct answer, however, overlooked that by … to familiarize' themselves of the African war in grassland and small dense forests where the rule was fire first and apologize afterwards. In this land … from the original date.'' 14. It is stated that the query pertains to Section 21 of the Limitation Act,1963 and therefore, the correct answer option should be (1) and not (3) furnished by the DHC impugned model

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 1996

R. Pampapathi Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-02-1996

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines And Minerals (Regulation And Development) Act, 1956; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 98A

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1510

Geology Department, have called upon the Petitioners to pay Forest Development Tax under Section 98A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Forest Act' or 'State Act') from 1.4.1992 at the rate of Eight per … that grant of a mining lease is a sale of minerals (forest produce) by the State under Rule 85(1)(iii) of Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969; and even if it is not a sale under Rule 85(1)(iii), it will

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial