Advanced Search Results

M/S Murudeshwara Ceramics Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 63, 79A, 79B, 79(4), 80, 82, 83 and 109; Karnataka Forests Act, 1963 - Sections 17; Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act; Forests Conservation Act

Reported in : AIR2001SC3017; JT2001(8)SC595; 2001(7)SCALE228; (2002)1SCC116

was finally notified under notification dated 27.10.1994 as Varakodu Reserve Forest Block under Section 17 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and as per that notification there is no right over any roads in this Reserve Forest Block. While … society or trust or a company or co-operative society or body of individuals and associations to hold land. Section 80 of the Act prohibits transfer of land in favour of non-agriculturists. The High Court is of the view

The Deputy Commissioner and Others Vs. Aravinda and Another

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

was countered on behalf of the State by referring to Rule 11 of the Rules as well as Section 80 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 besides placing reliance on a decision of this Court in Babajan H. … was to cut the trees and he applied for a Mafi Pass i.e., transport permit under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. Instead of issuing the said pass, the value of 357 logs of timber, 368 tonnes of firewood and

Punjab Urban Development Authority and ors. Vs. Dashmesh Educational S ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 77, 166 and 177; Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952 - Sections 6(6); Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 - Sections 4, 5 and 11; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 35; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 1, Rule 10; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 3(26); Transfer of Property Act, 1881 - Sections 2(6); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20; Forest Law

Reported in : (2005)139PLR238

purview of Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1990 (hereinafter referred to as P.L.P.A.) and attracts provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1900 (hereinafter referred to as the Forest Laws), therefore, no change of land use was permissible as provided … questions formulated are not substantial questions of law:-'(I) Whether in view of Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, in the absence of non-declaration of title to the land in question the suit was maintainable?(II) Whether in … Section 151 C.P.C. for interim injunction was also moved by the Plaintiff- Respondent No. 1. Another Application under Section 80(2) read with Section 151 CPC was also moved seeking dispensation of advance notice required to be served upon

Anant Ram Negi Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Private Forest Act, 1955 - Sections 4, 10 and 11; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 80 and 91; ;Forest Act, 1927 - Section 52

Reported in : AIR2003HP114

the H.P. Land Preservation Act, Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act. The value pf the seized trees and the timber was assessed in the sum of Rs. 9,30,980/-. On … and consequently Article 2 was not applicable and Article 49 (which corresponds to Article 91 of the Limitation Act, 1963) was held applicable to the suit.43. In Mangalji Chotelal's case supra the Officers of the Civil Supplies Department … to 3 in their written statement took preliminary objections that the suit is time barred, that notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure has not been served before the institution of the suit, that the

Anant Ram Negi Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Private Forest Act, 1955 - Sections 4, 10, 11, 52, 53 and 56; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 80 and 91

Reported in : AIR2004HP1

Department on the ground that the trees were illicitly felled and cases under Sections 41/42 of the Indian Forest Act, Sections 3, 4 and 16 of the H. P. Land Preservation Act were instituted against the plaintiff. On … and consequently Article 2 was not applicable and Article 49 (which corresponds to Article 91 of the Limitation Act, 1963) was held applicable to the suit.38. In Mangalji Chotelal's case (AIR 1991 Raj 167) (supra), the officers of … to 3, in their written statements, raised preliminary objections that the suit is time-barred; that the notice under Section 80, CPC has not been served before the institution of the suit; that the plaintiff is estopped from filing

Srinivasa Minerals Trading Company Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

liable to be confiscated by the Government. 13. Furthermore, learned counsel for the Government has placed reliance on Section 80 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 which reads as: "80, Presumption that forest produce belongs to Government- When … operated the mining lease in an illegal manner but they have been involved in offences under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Ultimately, the M.L. No.2173 having fallen into category 'C', the mine has been

Sri Srinivasa Minerals Trading Company Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

accordingly liable to be confiscated by the Government.13. Furthermore, learned counsel for the Government has placed reliance on Section 80 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 which reads as: “80. Presumption that forest produce belongs to Government- When … operated the mining lease in an illegal manner but they have been involved in offences under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Ultimately, the M.L. No.2173 having fallen into category ‘C’, the mine has been

Smt Jeanne Pinto Vs. Deputy Conservator Of Forests

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

never as forest land, as can be seen from the statement showing Section 4 declared under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 areas included in forest reserve as per Deputy Commissioner Notification dated 05.06.2002, wherein the plaintiff’s survey numbers are … cause of action to file the suit and the suit filed by the plaintiff is without compliance of Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure and hence the same is not maintainable and sought to dismiss the

Sri. Ramappa @ Ramesh S/o. Dharmanna Madar Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

notice under Section 41-A of Cr.P.C., for enquiry with regard to Banahatti ROR Crime No.33/2020-21, for offences under Section 80, 84, 86 and 87 of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Section 379 of IPC, whereunder, the motorcycle and … THE PETITIONER IN BANAHATTI ROR CRIME NO.33/2020-21 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION80 84, 86 AND87OF KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963, RULE144AND145OF KARNATAKA FOREST RULES, 1969 AND SECTION379OF IPC, BY THE RESPONDENT RANGE FOREST OFFICER, BANAHATTI RANGE, BAGALKOTE DIVISION,

The Deputy Commissioner Vs. Sri Aravinda

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

was countered on behalf of the State by referring to Rule 11 of the Rules as well as Section 80 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 besides placing reliance on a decision of this Court in Babajan H. … was to cut the trees and he applied for a Mafi Pass i.e., transport permit under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. Instead of issuing the said pass, the value of 357 logs of timber, 368 tonnes of firewood and