Advanced Search Results

Jai Lal Vs. the Punjab State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 2 and 49; Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 72 and 91; Patiala Forest Rule - Rule 10; Patiala Forests Act - Sections 76

Reported in : AIR1967Delhi118

Articles 2 and 49 of Schedule to Limitation Act, 1908, Articles 72 and 91 of Schedule to Limitation Act, 1963, Section 76 of Patiala Forests Act and Rule 10 of Patiala Forest Rule - Article 2 affords prtoection to persons

The Deputy Commissioner and Others Vs. Aravinda and Another

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

was to cut the trees and he applied for a Mafi Pass i.e., transport permit under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. Instead of issuing the said pass, the value of 357 logs of timber, 368 tonnes of firewood and … 1963 - Section 80 - Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Section 91, Section 93, Section 75 and Section 76 - Permission to fell jungle wood trees - payments for value of trees €“ denial of permission challenged

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi /acb

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … Volume - 18 D-838 - D-839 Volume - 19 D-840 - D-841 76 Box No.4 - R.C.14A/2012-CBI/ACB/BLR Details of case records - from 842 to … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … Volume - 18 D-838 - D-839 Volume - 19 D-840 - D-841 76 Box No.4 - R.C.14A/2012-CBI/ACB/BLR Details of case records - from 842 to … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Sri.s. Muthaiah Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … Volume - 18 D-838 - D-839 Volume - 19 D-840 - D-841 76 Box No.4 - R.C.14A/2012-CBI/ACB/BLR Details of case records - from 842 to … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … Volume - 18 D-838 - D-839 Volume - 19 D-840 - D-841 76 Box No.4 - R.C.14A/2012-CBI/ACB/BLR Details of case records - from 842 to … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Anant Ram Negi Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Private Forest Act, 1955 - Sections 4, 10 and 11; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 80 and 91; ;Forest Act, 1927 - Section 52

Reported in : AIR2003HP114

approval, prevented the plaintiff from cutting or removing the trees and confiscated them under Rule 10 framed under Section 76 of the Patiala Forest Act. Subsequently, on a writ petition filed by the Panchayat the High Court decided … the H.P. Land Preservation Act, Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act. The value pf the seized trees and the timber was assessed in the sum of Rs. 9,30,980/-. On … and consequently Article 2 was not applicable and Article 49 (which corresponds to Article 91 of the Limitation Act, 1963) was held applicable to the suit.43. In Mangalji Chotelal's case supra the Officers of the Civil Supplies Department

Kumar Stone Works Partner Inder Singh Son of Ram Prasad Singh and ors. ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh (Transport of Timber and other Forest Produce) Rules, 1978 - Rules 3, 4, 4(1), 5 and 15; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 4, 20, 41, 41(2) and 76; Forest Conservation Act, 1980 - Sections 2(1); Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 1963; Uttar Pradesh Transit of Timber and other Forest Produce (First Amendment) Rules, 2004

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2177

Matched in: Parties Kumar Stone Works Partner Inder Singh Son of Ram Prasad Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. Through Principal Secretary, Forest and ors.

Anant Ram Negi Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Private Forest Act, 1955 - Sections 4, 10, 11, 52, 53 and 56; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 80 and 91

Reported in : AIR2004HP1

approval, prevented the plaintiff from cutting or removing the trees and confiscated them under Rule 10 framed under Section 76 of the Patiala Forest Act. Subsequently, on a writ petition filed by the Panchayat the High Court decided … Department on the ground that the trees were illicitly felled and cases under Sections 41/42 of the Indian Forest Act, Sections 3, 4 and 16 of the H. P. Land Preservation Act were instituted against the plaintiff. On … and consequently Article 2 was not applicable and Article 49 (which corresponds to Article 91 of the Limitation Act, 1963) was held applicable to the suit.38. In Mangalji Chotelal's case (AIR 1991 Raj 167) (supra), the officers of

Bhagavan Kantharaj Vs. the State of Karnataka Represented by State Pub ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Offences P/U/S 8 And 22 Of Karnataka Tree Preservation Act 1976 R/W Secs. 104-A And 13 Of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963.) 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned HCGP. Perused the records. 2. The allegations … the reserved forest area which is impermissible. On the above said allegations, they have registered a case under Sections 8 and 22 of Karnataka Trees Preservation Act, 1976. 3. The petitioner moved Sessions Court for grant of … bail in the event of his arrest in connection with FIR No. 76/2013/FOC NO.24/2013-14 for the offences punishable under Sections 8 and 22 of the