Advanced Search Results

Jai Lal Vs. the Punjab State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 2 and 49; Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 72 and 91; Patiala Forest Rule - Rule 10; Patiala Forests Act - Sections 76

Reported in : AIR1967Delhi118

Articles 2 and 49 of Schedule to Limitation Act, 1908, Articles 72 and 91 of Schedule to Limitation Act, 1963, Section 76 of Patiala Forests Act and Rule 10 of Patiala Forest Rule - Article 2 affords prtoection to

Bhavani Tea and Produce Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Sections 2(7), 2(15), 2(34), 2(38), 2(44), 2(47), 81 and 82; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 3; Madras Preservation of Private Forest Act, 1949 - Sections 1(2) and 2; Madras Preservation of Private Forest (Second Amendment) Act, 1954;

Reported in : JT1991(1)SC503; 1991(1)KLT666(SC); 1991(1)SCALE319; (1991)2SCC463; [1991]1SCR550

the case to show that the company's plantations area was a forest under the M.P.P.F. Act.19. The Kerala Forest Act, 1961 (Act 4 of 1962) was an Act to unify and amend the law relating to the protection … statement of objects and reasons also said that the private forests as defined in the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (1 of 1964) were exempt from the ceiling thereunder and that with high density of population there was … the assent of the President on 23.8.1971, and as provided in its Section 1(3) it was deemed to have come into force on the 10th

Gatlameedi Pothanna and Others Vs. Divisional Forest Officer, Nirmal, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Miscellaneous

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967 - Sections 28(A, B, D, E and G); Andhra Pradesh Preservation of Private Forest Rules, 1978 - Rule 8(1); Constitution of India - Articles 51-A and 226; Forest Conservation Act, 1980 - Sections 2 and 21; Andhra Pradesh Produce Transit Rules, 1970; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 17(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 72

Reported in : 1998(3)ALD716; 1998(3)ALT660

Matched in: Parties Gatlameedi Pothanna and Others Vs. Divisional Forest Officer, Nirmal, Adilabad Dist.

Pioneer Rubber Plantation, Nilambur Vs. State of Kerala and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 133(1); States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 5; Madras Preservation of Private Forests Act, 1949; Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Sections 72, 82 and 84; Kerala Forest Act - Sections 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 and 15

Reported in : AIR1993SC192; JT1992(5)SC144; 1992(2)SCALE231; (1992)4SCC175; [1992]3SCR972; 1992(2)LC724(SC)

the Act then states that the private forests shall be deemed to be reserved forests under the Kerala Forest Act so long as they remain vested in the Government. Section 8 provides for settlement of disputes which arise … the appointed day excluding (A) lands which are gardens or nilams as defined in the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (1 of 1964); (B) lands which are used principally for the cultivation of tea, coffee, cocoa, rubber, cardamom … Whether a certificate of purchase issued by the Land Tribunal under Section 72K of the Act is binding on the Taluk Land Board in proceedings

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

THAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DEMAND AND COLLECT FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX UNDER SECTION98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 ON THE VALUE OF MINERAL SOLD BY THE PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF THE MINING LEASES GRANTED UNDER THE … & R.2) ***** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION98 OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT1993AND NOTIFICATION DT. 16.8.2008 PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE ON278.2008 VIDE ANNEXURE B DOES

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional Manager K. Praveen Kumar and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, by its Secretary to the Forest, Ecology and Environment Department and Others

Mahabir Kishore and Others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ContractLimitation

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 72; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 7(2), 9(3), 17(1) and 23 - Schedule - Articles 24 and 96; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Article 226; Sales Tax Act; Assam Taxation (on Goods Carried by Road or Inland Wateways) Act, 1954; Specific Relief Acts, 1963; Central Excise Act, 1944

Reported in : AIR1990SC313; 1989(24)ECC199; 1989(43)ELT205(SC); [1990]184ITR548(SC); (1989)4SCC1; [1989]3SCR596; 1989(2)LC576(SC)

sum of Rs. 54,606.00.3. On 17.10.1961 the Under Secretary to Government, M.P., Forest Department, Bhopal wrote the following letter No. 10130-X/61 (Exhibit D-23) to the … view that Article 113 read with Section 17, and not Article 24, of the Schedule to the Limitation Act 1963, was applicable; and held that the limitation began to run from 17.10.1961 on which date the Government decided … remedies are quasi contract or restitution and theory of unjust enrichment has not been closed in English law.'13. Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act deals with liability of person to whom money is paid or thing delivered,

Mahabir Kishore and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ContractLimitation

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 72; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 17, 17(1) - Schedule - Articles 24 and 113; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80

Reported in : [1990]69CompCas16(SC); JT1989(3)SC327; (1989)4SCC1a

sum of Rs. 54,606.00.3. On 17.10.1961 the Under Secretary to Government, M.P. Forest Department, Bhopal wrote the following letter No. 10130-X/61 (Exhibit D-23) to the … view that Article 113 read with Section 17, and not Article 24, of the Schedule to the Limitation Act 1963, was applicable; and held that the limitation began to run from 17.10.1961 on which date the Government decided … remedies are quasi contract or restitution and theory of unjust enrichment has not been closed in English law.'13. Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act deals with liability of person to whom money is paid or thing delivered,

Doiwala Sehkari Shram Samvida Samiti Ltd. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 86 and 87; ;Forest Conservation Act, 1980; ;Minor Mineral Development Regulation Act, 1957 - Sections 15 and 17A(2); ;Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Section 4, 4A, 15, 17 and 18; ;Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963 - Rules 8C, 9, 9A, 27, 72, 77 and 78; ;Uttaranchal Minor Mineral (Concession) Rules, 2001 - Rules 1(5), 3 and 3(2)l ;(Adaptation and Modification) Order, 2001; ;Uttar Pradesh Sub-Mineral (Remission) Regulations, 1963; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(6) and 348

the application of the appellant complete in all respect vide order dated 3.8.1998 directed the sub-Divisional Magistrate, Division Forest Officer and Deputy Director, Geology and Mining to submit their report on the application. The Divisional Forest Officer, … fell under the newly formed State of Uttaranchal which exercising power under Section 87 of the U.P. Reorganisation Act, 2000 extended the U.P. Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules 1963 with certain modification/amendment to the newly formed State of … Rule 27 provides procedure for grant of lease by auction. Under Rule 72 if any area, which was held under a mining lease, under Chapter-II

Bhagwati Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. the State of Maharashtr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyTrusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 - Rule 636 and 636(1); Constitution of India - Article 226; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(2), 2(11), 2(12), 2(22), 2(23), 2(24), 2(25), 2(41), 29, 30, 31, 37, 38, 50, 53, 72(1), 72(2), 72(3), 148 and 157; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 54, 65, 113, 136 and 137; General Clauses Act - Sections 27

Reported in : 2004(1)ALLMR690

any right in favour of any person, certainly there is a period of limitation prescribed under the Limitation Act, 1963. The Article 54 of the First Schedule of the Limitation Act prescribes the period for limitation for enforcing … challenge the order dated 16-12-1992, passed by the Deputy Secretary, Revenue and Forests Department as well as the order dated 11-2-1993 by the Collector for … in force, and on the fulfilment of any other terms or conditions lawfully annexed to his tenure. The Section 72(3) provides that if within three years of the date on which the Collector takes possession of the occupancy