Advanced Search Results
K.M Thimmaiah So MuddappA. Vs. the Station House Officer Ponnampet Pol ...
Karnataka
Feb-29-2012
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 406, 408, 420, 465, 468, 471, 477A, 379, 34; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 62, 71(A), 144, 104(A); Karnataka Forest Rules - Rule 127(A), 165; Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976 - Sections 8, 15, 19
420, 465, 468, 471, 477-A, 379 r/w 34 of IPC, Sections 62, 71(A), 144, 104(A) of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Rule 127(A) and 165 of the Karnataka Forest Rules and Sections 8, 15 and 19 of the … is accused No .3 has Crime No.160/ 2011 registered by Ponnampet police Madikeri for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 408, 420, 465, 468, 471, 477-A, 379 r/w 34 of IPC, Sections 62, 71(A), 144, 104(A) of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Karnataka Vs. K.A. Kunchindammed
Supreme Court of India
Apr-16-2002
Criminal
Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 2(7), 2(18), 62, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 71, 71A, 71A(3), 71C, 71D, 71E, 71F and 71G; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482
AIR2002SC1875; (SCSuppl)2002(4)CHN157; 2002CriLJ2565; 2002(2)Crimes228(SC); JT2002(4)SC255; 2002(3)SCALE706; (2002)9SCC90; [2002]3SCR162; 2002(2)LC855(SC)
of the Act include the term 'sandalwood oil' - Sections 12, 71-A to 71-G, 2(18) of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963- Section 451 of Cr. P. C. - - Having failed to get any response from the RTO the Authorised
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDivisional Forest Officer Vs. Kallur Rangappa
Karnataka
Feb-27-1986
Civil
Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 62(1), 71, 71A, 71C, 71D and 71G; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397 and 401; Constitution of India - Article 226
ILR1986KAR1029; 1986(1)KarLJ348
Matched in: Parties Divisional Forest Officer Vs. Kallur Rangappa
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
H.K. Basavaraju and ors. Vs. the Tahsildar and ors.
Karnataka
Feb-21-2006
Property
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 71; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 3 and 4
2006(6)KarLJ324
Forest Department, in the absence of an order by the State Government under Section 3 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and notification under Section 4 of the Act, the legal position is that the land continues to be … lands were granted in favour of the petitioners. Accordingly, respondent 2-Deputy Commissioner issued a notification dated 11-9-1973 under Section 71 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 releasing 677 acres 27 guntas of waste lands which are fit
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShanthi Devi Lodha Vs. the Deputy Conservator of Forest and Authorised ...
Karnataka
Sep-22-2003
CriminalMotor Vehicles
Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 2(11) and 71B; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 51(5)
2004CriLJ2451; ILR2003KAR4601; 2004(2)KarLJ238
Matched in: Parties Shanthi Devi Lodha Vs. the Deputy Conservator of Forest and Authorised Officer
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsgar. S/O Syed ShA. Vs. State of KarnatakA. by Rfo. Thithimathi.
Karnataka
Jan-27-2011
Environment
Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 104(A), 104(D), 71(AL 24(6); Karnataka Forest Rules - Rules 144 r/w 165, 127(A)
in F.O.C.Ne.34/2010-11 in respect of the offences punishable under sections 104(A), 104(D), 71(AL 24(6), SO of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Rules 144 r/w 165, 127(A) of the Karnataka Forest Rules2. The complaint allegations in short are that, … by A-3 who is one of the three accused in F.O.C.Ne.34/2010-11 in respect of the offences punishable under sections 104(A), 104(D), 71(AL 24(6), SO of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Rules 144 r/w 165, 127(A) of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAuthorised Officer Vs. Venkataraman Bommayya Naik
Karnataka
Aug-14-1990
Civil
Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 71B(2)
ILR1990KAR3936
to the Deputy Conservator of Forests, Honavar Division, Honavar, who is also the Authorised Officer under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (for short 'the Act'). The said Authorised Officer issued a notice under Section 71-B(1) of the Act to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Karnataka and Another Vs. Chandra Devi JaIn H.P.
Karnataka
Jul-10-2000
Criminal
Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 62(1), 71-A, 71-B and 71-F; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(30) and 51(5)
ILR2000KAR3657; 2000(6)KarLJ291
and the RC holder being one Mohammed. The said vehicle was seized under Section 62(1) of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 ('Forest Act' for short) on the, officer concerned having reason to believe that a forest offence has been … to believe that a forest offence has been committed. Confiscation proceeding were initiated in that regard under Section 71-A of the Forest Act. The vehicle, in due course was ordered to be confiscated. It even vested in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChannabasappa Vs. State by Arehally Police, Belur
Karnataka
Jun-30-1998
Criminal
Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 53, 2(7 and 20), 62, 71-G and A and 104-A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1993 - Sections 397, 451 and 457; Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969 - Rule 127-A
1998CriLJ4293; ILR1998KAR3574; 1998(6)KarLJ53
of Lorry No. KA 05 1194. The said vehicle has been seized under Section 62 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 ('Act' for short) as a vehicle used in the commission of a forest offence in respect of a … that the logs were its own properties. All that was being contended was that, in view of Section 71-G of the Act, the learned Magistrate had no jurisdiction.5. In addition to the absence of assertion that the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt Jeanne Pinto Vs. Deputy Conservator Of Forests
Karnataka
Jan-06-2021
Land Acquisition
never as forest land, as can be seen from the statement showing Section 4 declared under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 areas included in forest reserve as per Deputy Commissioner Notification dated 05.06.2002, wherein the plaintiff’s survey numbers are … notification as per Ex.D.2. Once the suit schedule properties are declared as reserve forest lands, by acting under Section 71 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, the contention of the plaintiff that the suit lands are revenue
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »