Advanced Search Results

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi /acb

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … law or rules under which that authority is competent to do so.” 69 It is in accordance with such practice that the draft sanction orders … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … law or rules under which that authority is competent to do so.” 69 It is in accordance with such practice that the draft sanction orders … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Sri.s. Muthaiah Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … law or rules under which that authority is competent to do so.” 69 It is in accordance with such practice that the draft sanction orders … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … law or rules under which that authority is competent to do so.” 69 It is in accordance with such practice that the draft sanction orders … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

State of Karnataka Vs. K.A. Kunchindammed

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 2(7), 2(18), 62, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 71, 71A, 71A(3), 71C, 71D, 71E, 71F and 71G; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : AIR2002SC1875; (SCSuppl)2002(4)CHN157; 2002CriLJ2565; 2002(2)Crimes228(SC); JT2002(4)SC255; 2002(3)SCALE706; (2002)9SCC90; [2002]3SCR162; 2002(2)LC855(SC)

of the Act include the term 'sandalwood oil' - Sections 12, 71-A to 71-G, 2(18) of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963- Section 451 of Cr. P. C. - - Having failed to get any response from the RTO the Authorised … been passed under Section 65 or Section 67, as the case may be, and the period specified by Section 69 for an appeal form such order has elapsed, and no such appeal has been preferred, or when on

Mspl Limited, Rep by Its Executive Director. Vs. the State of Karnatak ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Mines And Minerals

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 226, 227; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 59, 30, 7A(1), 60, 24A95); Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 30, 11(2), 17A

Reported in : 2009(1)KCCR5(SN)

context of the various statutory enactments such as Forest Act, 1927 [and in the case of Karnataka, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 also] Forest [Conservation] Act, 1980, Environment [Protection] Act, 1986, Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 and the supporting Rules both … refer to the observations of the Supreme Court as contained in paras 69, 70 and 71 of SAMATHA'S case which is as under.`69. As stated … central government in terms of the communication dated 6-12-2004 [copy at Annexure-K to the writ petition] as per Section 5(1) of the Act and as no more land is available for grant of lease in favour of

State Of Kerala Vs. M/s Popular Estates (now Dissolved)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reorganisation Act, 1956 (Central Act 37 of 1956)- (i) any land to which the Madras Preservation of Private Forest Act, 1949 (Madras Act XXVII of 1949), applied immediately before the appointed day excluding- (A) lands which are gardens … Popular Plantation would amount to res judicata. A draft statement under the provisions of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (hereafter, “KLR Act”) was filed. Section 81 of the KLR Act exempted private forests and plantations. Rule 10 … notification after a long lapse of 5 MFA230& 231/1978 6 Suit Nos. 69 & 71/ 1987 before the civil court Munsif's Court, Hosdurg 7 Before

Bharath Booshan Aggarwal Vs. The State Of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the conviction and sentence (of 3 years’ imprisonment) for the offence punishable under Section 27 of the Kerala Forest Act (hereafter “the Act”).2. The first appellant is a partner of the appellant’s firm, and claims to be manufacturer … Central Excise authorities to manufacture sandalwood oil. Registration of the appellant’s firm under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 was established. The firm had no infrastructure to manufacture sandalwood oil from … the defence to explain this vital aspect rendered the findings of the Sessions Court, vulnerable. Taking note of Section 69 of the Act, which mandated a presumption of culpability in the event possession was found in any given

Sri Anjinappa vs Conservator of Forests

Court : Karnataka

mutated in revenue records under MR No.14/2000-2001 after his demise.3. In response, respondent No.2 initiated proceedingsunder the Karnataka Forest Act, calling for the removal of encroachment on the aforementioned 12 guntas. After haring, based on a work plan … R-2 was confirmed by the respondent No.1 in an appeal under Section 64-A(3) of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963.5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner argues that theorder was based on a work plan prepared without providing anopportunity

M/S Prakruti Century Properties vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Forest Conservation Act, 1980 [hereinafter referred to as ‘FCA 1980] and Section 24-G, 24-GG, 24-H of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 [hereinafter referred to as ‘KFA 1963’]. Petitioners issued replies to the said notices. It is challenging the said … No.2 to 5 claim to be bona fideowners of the land bearing survey Nos. 68, 118, (old No.69/3, 69/2, portion of 69/3, 69/4 and 69/5), situated at Chikkasane village, Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli post.4. Petitioner No.1 is stated