Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 68 · Page 1 of about 516 results (0.077 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 13 1984

Hasanabba and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-13-1984

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 62, 62(3) and 68; Karnataka Forest (Amendment) Act, 1980

Reported in : ILR1984KAR530

on the file of theJMFC., Narasimharajapura, guilty of offences punishable under Sections. 86 and 87 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (the Act) and have sentenced each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year on each count … the prosecution, if any, launched or pending. Even if the property is required to be disposed of under Section 68 of the Act, it may be necessary, if it is possible, to keep some sample and to bring

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2019

P. T. Sreenarayanan Unni Vs. State of Kerala .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-16-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

State Reorganization Act, 1956 (Central Act 37 of 1956)­ (i) any land which the Madras Preservation of Private Forest Act, 1949 (Madras Act XXVII of 1949), applied immediately before the appointed day excluding­ (A) land which are gardens … his personal cultivation as is within the 2 ceiling limit applicable to him under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (1 of 1964) or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto. Explanation:­ For the purposes of … Forest (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”].. Section 3 of the Act reads as follows :- Section 3 ­ Private … of the 100 acres of land in Survey No.186/1A1, 79 acres and 68.5 cents was not private forest land. They claimed 1 (1973) 2 SCC713

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2004

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Sujit Kumar Rana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-20-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(3), 20, 29, 44(2A), 49(7), 50A to 59G, 62, 63, 67 and 68; Constitution of India - Articles 48A, 51A, 136, 226 and 300A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 6A(2), 6C, 6E and 7(1); Karnataka Forest Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR2004SC1851; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)258; (2004)3CALLT55(SC); [2004(4)JCR137(SC)]; JT2004(5)SC157; 2004(1)SCALE641; (2004)4SCC129

Kunchindammed ( : 2002CriLJ2565 ), this Court observed that even the expression 'sandalwood' as contained in the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 would include 'sandalwood oil'. This court in no uncertain terms held :'The Karnataka Forest Act is a special … chains, boats, vehicles or cattle seized under Section 52'19. Sections 67 and 68 read as under :-'67. Power to try offences summarily. -The District Magistrate … S.B. Sinha, J.INTRODUCTION:1. Applicability of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing a proceeding for confiscation of forest-produce etc. under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 09 2002

D.S. Vijaya Kumar Vs. Deputy Conservator of Forest, Hassan Division, H ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-09-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 62, 62(1) and 71A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : ILR2002KAR1375; 2002(2)KarLJ537

his staff near Vatehole Nale Cross near Alur-Chikkodi Road, initiated confiscation proceedings under Section 71-A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 ('the Act' for short). Notice of this proceeding was served on the petitioner who is the owner of … the prosecution, if any, launched or pending. Even if the property is required to be disposed of under Section 68 of the Act, it may be necessary, if it is possible, to keep some sample and to bring

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2001

Sanjeet Singh Grewal Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-28-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 14, 17, 29, 31, 31(1), 42, 43, 56, 56(1), 67, 68, to 78, 81, 82, 148, 179 and 181; Constitution of India - Article 226; Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 3(2), 5, 10, 11 and 12; Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development (General) Rules, 1995 - Rule 22; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4 and 5-A; Land Preservation Act; Forest Act; Punjab Scheduled Roads, and Controlled Areas Restrictions of Unregulated Development Act, 1963; Punjab Urban Estates (Development and Regulation) Act, 1964; Punjab Housing Development Board Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 15 and 16; Tamil Nadu State Housing Board Act, 1961 - Sections 35, 35(2) and (3) and 36

Reported in : AIR2001P& H261

A large part of this land is covered by the provisions of the Land Preservation Act and the Forest Act. Chunks of this land have been exchanging hands at a very low rate. The second category of land … deserves notice that the statute specially repeals the Punjab Scheduled Roads, and Controlled Areas Restrictions of Unregulated Development Act, 1963, and the Punjab Urban Estates (Development and Regulation) Act, 1964. It is further provided that the 'Punjab Housing … persons except with the permission from the competent authority under Section 67, 68, 81, 82 of the Act. Such a detailed and long drawn procedure … On March 13, 2000, the State of Punjab issued various notifications under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for acquisition of land in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2000

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Agricultural Marketing Produce Comcommi ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-18-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Delhi Agricultural Market Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 5, 5(7), (9), (10) and (14), 8, 9, 10, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 34, 35, 39 and 65; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(20) and 256(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) General Rules, 1978; Constitution of India - Article 239; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Delhi Development Act - Sections 3, 4, 5, 30, 37, 52, 56 and 59; Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(Del)298; [2001]250ITR369(Delhi)

it did not function independently.10. Thereafter came the decision of the apex court in CIT v. U. P. Forest Corporation : [1998]230ITR945(SC) . Again the principles in R. C. Jain's case : (1981)ILLJ402SC were reiterated and by … Bombay High Court examined the question whether the market comcommittee constituted under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, to which reference has been made, was a local authority. After examining various clauses of the Act, it … Arijit Pasayat, C.J.1. All these references under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'), involve identical … administrator for write off of irrecoverable fees, etc., in certain cases (section 68)(xv) State Government to make rules (section 59).(xvi) Director to register or refuse

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1980

State of Gujarat and anr. Vs. Vaghela Dayabhai Chaturbhai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-05-1980

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Bombay Land Revenue Code; Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1921

Reported in : (1980)GLR773(SC); (1980)3SCC318; [1980]2SCR1182

unalienated portions of villages, for free pasturage for the village cattle, for forest reserves, or for any other public or municipal purpose; and lands assigned … be used as market yards under the management of market committees established under the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963 etc. Rule 35 of the Rules empowers the Collector to exempt from payment of land' revenue without any … occupancy right over the land granted, subject to the lawful conditions imposed under the grant. The proviso to Section 68 of the Code, however, provides that notwithstanding any provision in the Code, it shall not be unlawful for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2025

M/S Prakruti Century Properties vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-18-2025

Forest Conservation Act, 1980 [hereinafter referred to as ‘FCA 1980] and Section 24-G, 24-GG, 24-H of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 [hereinafter referred to as ‘KFA 1963’]. Petitioners issued replies to the said notices. It is challenging the said … of 2021:3. The Petitioners No.2 to 5 claim to be bona fideowners of the land bearing survey Nos. 68, 118, (old No.69/3, 69/2, portion of 69/3, 69/4 and 69/5), situated at Chikkasane village, Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli post.4.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2025

Mr. Mohammed Shoaib vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-18-2025

Forest Conservation Act, 1980 [hereinafter referred to as ‘FCA 1980] and Section 24-G, 24-GG, 24-H of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 [hereinafter referred to as ‘KFA 1963’]. Petitioners issued replies to the said notices. It is challenging the said … of 2021:3. The Petitioners No.2 to 5 claim to be bona fideowners of the land bearing survey Nos. 68, 118, (old No.69/3, 69/2, portion of 69/3, 69/4 and 69/5), situated at Chikkasane village, Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli post.4.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2021

Smt Jeanne Pinto Vs. Deputy Conservator Of Forests

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-06-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

never as forest land, as can be seen from the statement showing Section 4 declared under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 areas included in forest reserve as per Deputy Commissioner Notification dated 05.06.2002, wherein the plaintiff’s survey numbers are … in paragraphs 2 to 4 of the plaint and contended that the plaintiff has encroached forest land measuring 68 acres 33 guntas. In this regard, the Range Forest Officer, Koppa Range, booked Forest Offence Case in FOC

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial