Advanced Search Results

Ashoka vs State by Range Forest Officer Belur

Court : Karnataka

Hassan. The accused has been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 24 and 86 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter for the sake of brevity, referred to as 'the Act') and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for … documents to show that PW-3 is competent to issue Certificate at Ex.P-3 as per the provisions contained in Section 62C of the Act. The prosecution has not produced any notification containing the name of PW-3 stating that he

B K Raja vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Karnataka on 21.5.2010, which reads as under:"The Government of Karnataka hereby notifies as per Rule 62(c) of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 authorizing the following trained forest officers to issue of certificates for offence cases irrespective of forest produce. 1) … the certificate Ex-P10 issued by PW.10 is not in accordance with law and there is non- compliance of Section 62C of the Act. Hence, in the absence of compliance of statutory provision, conviction of the appellant-accused No.1 for

K N Kumar vs State by Chikkanayakanahalli

Court : Karnataka

Karnataka on 21.5.2010, which reads as under:"The Government of Karnataka hereby notifies as per Rule 62(c) of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 authorizing the following trained forest officers to issue of certificates for offence cases irrespective of forest produce. 1) … Further, the certificate Ex-P3 issued by PW.3 is not in accordance with law and there is non-compliance of Section 62C of the Act. Hence, in the absence of compliance of statutory provisions, the -5- conviction of the appellant-accused

Sri.Madashetty @ Mada vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

the order ofconviction and sentence of the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 87 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 read with Section 379 of IPC, wherein the Trial Court convicted and sentenced the petitioner for the above … even not obtained any certificate and though relied upon Ex.P.4, the Range Forest Officer has not been examined. Section 62C of the Karnataka Forest Act is clear that the Range Forest Officer must have the training and there

Kumar R vs State by

Court : Karnataka

registered for the offence punishable under Sections 24(c)(ii), 62, 62(3)(a), 62B, 62C, 84 r/w 86 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, is before this Court under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.2. Heard the learned counsel

Nayaz @ Razak and Another Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

9. The main contention of the learned counsel for the appellant rs that Section 62(C) of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, reads as under: “62C. Certificate of Forest Officer to be an evidence.- Any document purporting to be a

State of Karnataka vs Mahamed Rafiq

Court : Karnataka

Furthermore, the investigating officer has notcomplied with the mandatory provisions of section 62(3) of Chapter IX of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. After seizure of the property, the investigating officer has not intimated the same to the concerned officer under … court on 4th July 2012 at 2:45 pm. The Investigating officer has not complied with themandatory provisions of section 62C of the Karnataka Forest Act. The investigating officer has not produced the certificate issued by the concerned Forest