Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 62a · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.017 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 04 2004

S. Murari and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka, by Range Forest Officer

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-04-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 155(2), 156 and 482; Karnataka Police Act, 1963 - Sections 2(16), 19 and 20; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 62A, 62A(1) and 155

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2272; ILR2004KAR1706; 2004(6)KarLJ115

Range Forest Officer to investigate the case against the accused for offences under Section 24 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, Section 35(6) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980.4. Criminal … 155 (2) & 156, 482 --KARNATAKA POLICE ACT, 1963 -- SECTION 2(16) -- KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 -- SECTION 62A-INVESTIGATION OF NON-COGNIZABLE OFFENCES -- SECTION 155(2) -- Powers of the Magistrate under -- HELD -- Magistrate is empowered

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2009

Chowgle and Company by Its Gpa Holder, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar S/O Sri Hiral ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-24-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 62A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960; Karnataka Forest Rules - Rules 62A, 62B, 146 and 149; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

assuming the respondents have got power to initiate action against the petitioner under Section 62A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (for short, 'the KF Act'), the same ought not to have been exercised arbitrarily, illegally and unreasonably against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2009

Sri Kumaraswamy Mineral Exports Rep. by Shantesh Gureddi Partner Vs. S ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-24-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 62A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Karnataka Forest Rules - Rules 62A, 62B, 146 and 149

assuming the respondents have got power to initiate action against the petitioner under Section 62A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (for short, 'the KF Act'), the same ought not to have been exercised arbitrarily, illegally and unreasonably against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 24 2009

H.R. Gaviappa and Co. (a Registered Partnership Firm) Vs. State of Kar ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-24-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 62A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Karnataka Forest Rules - Rules 62A, 62B, 146 and 149

assuming the respondents have got power to initiate action against the petitioner under Section 62A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (for short, 'the KF Act'), the same ought not to have been exercised arbitrarily, illegally and unreasonably against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2009

Lakshminarayana Mining Company Registered Partnership Firm Represented ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-24-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 62A; Karnataka Forest Rules - Rules 62A, 62B, 146 and 149; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : ILR2009KAR3259

assuming the respondents have got power to initiate action against the petitioner under Section 62A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (for short, 'the KF Act'), the same ought not to have been exercised arbitrarily, illegally and unreasonably against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2009

V.S. Lad and Sons, a Registered Partnership Firm Rep. by Its Partner/R ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-13-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957; Karnataka Forest Act, 1962 - Sections 12(7)(4), 24, 62, 64, 73, 81 and 82; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 62A and 62B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969 - Rules 62A, 62B, 65, 146, 146(2) and 149; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3760; 2009(6)KarLJ430; 2009(3)KCCR2067; 2009(5)AIRKarR41; AIR2009NOC2599; 2009CriLJ3760(D.B)

assuming the respondents have got power to initiate action against the petitioner under Section 62A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (for short, 'the KF Act'), the same ought not to have been exercised arbitrarily, illegally and unreasonably against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2009

M/S Kanhaiyalal Dudheria Represented by Its Partner Sri Sanjay Bachhaw ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-24-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 62A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Karnataka Forest Rules - Rules 62A, 62B, 146 and 149

assuming the respondents have got power to initiate action against the petitioner under Section 62A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (for short, 'the KF Act'), the same ought not to have been exercised arbitrarily, illegally and unreasonably against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2009

Smt. Ambika Ghorpade W/O Sri Karthikeya Ghorpade Vs. State of Karnatak ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-24-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 62A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Karnataka Forest Rules - Rules 62A, 62B, 146 and 149; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

assuming the respondents have got power to initiate action against the petitioner under Section 62A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (for short, 'the KF Act), the some ought not to have been exercised arbitrarily, illegally and unreasonably against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial