Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 61 · Page 1 of about 489 results (0.047 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

Jun 25 1999

M.K. Sasidharan Vs. the Forest Range Officer and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-25-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Kerala Forest Act, 1961 - Sections 52, 52(1), 52(2), 53, 54, 55 and 61A to F; Kerala Forest (Amendment) Act, 1975; Indian Forest (Maharashtra) Amendment Act, 1984; Indian Forest (Maharashtra) Amendment Act, 1985

Reported in : 1999CriLJ4844

come up for consideration is whether second respondent is disabled from proceeding with Section 61-A of the Kerala Forest Act, 1961, if there is failure on the part of the Authorised Officer in reporting the seizure to the … of the Supreme Court in Kalliani Amma v. K. Devi (1996) 4 SCC 76 : (AIR 1996 SC 1963). Therefore it is with that purpose that the Legislature has introduced Sections 61-A to F so that a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2012

Research Foundation for Science Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-06-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 27, 47, 48A; Hazardous Wastes (Management & Handling) Rules, 1989 - Rules 5, 11, 19, 20; Customs Act, 1962; Central Excise Act, 1944; Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 61, 62

while disposing of hazardous waste, in exercise of power under Sections 61 and 62of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, they were required to ensure that the H.W.M.H. Rules, as amended up to date, and in particular, Rules … people of this country. The Writ Petitioner sought to challenge the decision of the Ministry of Environment and Forests permitting import of toxic wastes in India under the cover of recycling, which, according to the Petitioner, made … 2003, in which the H.W.M.H. Rules,1989, fell for consideration having regard to Section 11 of the Customs Act, 1962, which empowers the Central Government to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2000

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Agricultural Marketing Produce Comcommi ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-18-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Delhi Agricultural Market Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 5, 5(7), (9), (10) and (14), 8, 9, 10, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 34, 35, 39 and 65; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(20) and 256(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) General Rules, 1978; Constitution of India - Article 239; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Delhi Development Act - Sections 3, 4, 5, 30, 37, 52, 56 and 59; Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(Del)298; [2001]250ITR369(Delhi)

came the decision of the apex court in CIT v. U. P. Forest Corporation : [1998]230ITR945(SC) . Again the principles in R. C. Jain's case … Bombay High Court examined the question whether the market comcommittee constituted under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, to which reference has been made, was a local authority. After examining various clauses of the Act, it … cancellation by the director of any license granted or renewed (section 27(4)).-(x) Power of administrator to delegate power (section 61)(x) Director to hold enquiry into the affairs of a market com-committee (section 44).(xi) Power of administrator to make

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Aug 20 1999

K.N. Sushama Vs. Mercy Antony and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-20-1999

Subject : Election

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Article 243 and 243ZG

Reported in : AIR2000Ker83

considered the nature of the jurisdiction exercised by the District Judge under Section 61- D of the Kerala Forest Act, 1961, it was held that the District Judge functions as a Civil Court while considering an appeal under … of the Kerala Panchayat Act, 1960 and Rule 4 of the Kerala Panchayats (Decision of Election Disputes) Rules, 1963 issued under the above Act. Section 22 provided that an application challenging the validity of election can be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Mrs Rosamma Varghese Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION SPECIAL COURT, BENGALURU IN PROCEEDINGS DATED1611.1997 AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS33AND73KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963, RULE25 42, 43 KARNATAKA FOREST RULES, 1969, COLUMN NO.2 THE FOREST CONSERVATION ACT1980AND SECTIONS4AND5OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION … EHT LAND GRABBING SPECIAL COURT IN PROCEEDINGS No.LGC(P) NO.310/ 2017 AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION43]. OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PHOHIBITION ACT2011[ANNEXURE-B]. AND ETC. IN W.P. No.36459/2018: BETWEEN:1. . SRI C. GOVARDHAN REDDY … SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER. 61.(2013) 1 SCC353 TUKARAM KANA JOSHI AND OTHERS Vs. MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021