Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 48 · Page 1 of about 540 results (0.048 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 02 2005

Smt. Gangamma and anr. Vs. the Tahsildar and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-02-2005

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48A(6)

Reported in : ILR2005KAR4852; 2005(6)KarLJ97

measurement and after giving an opportunity of being heard to the concerned parties. ;Writ Petition allowed. - KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963.[K.A. No. 5/1964]. Section 62 (3)(a): [K. Sreedhar Rao & B. Sreenivasa Gowda, JJ] Failure to report seizure … counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that after the introduction of second proviso to Sub-section (6) of Section 48A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 (for short 'Act'), the Land Tribunal has power to correct the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2017

Sarin Memorial Legal Aid Foundation vs.state of Punjab & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-12-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary, lower Shivalik Hills and foothills of Shivalik, Sukhna Cho and surrounding areas declared as reserve forest. Thus the entire area is highly eco-fragile and any construction within the catchment area would cause irreversible damage … No.6 falls within the catchment area of Sukhna lake. This will obviously aspect the Punjab Reorganisation Act, concerning Section 48(5) of 1966 read with the 13th Schedule appended thereto and the notification dated 15th March, 1963 No.1789-Ft-IV/63/898. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2017

Aalok Jagga vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-12-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary, lower Shivalik Hills and foothills of Shivalik, Sukhna Cho and surrounding areas declared as reserve forest. Thus the entire area is highly eco-fragile and any construction within the catchment area would cause irreversible damage … No.6 falls within the catchment area of Sukhna lake. This will obviously aspect the Punjab Reorganisation Act, concerning Section 48(5) of 1966 read with the 13th Schedule appended thereto and the notification dated 15th March, 1963 No.1789-Ft-IV/63/898. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 24 1963

Kuppathode Madhavan Nair and ors. Vs. the State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-24-1963

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(2), 19, 19(1) and 31; Kerala Forest Act, 1961 - Sections 48 to 51; Kerala Forest Act, 1962; Madras Wild Elephants Presevation Act, 1873; Madras Wild Elephants Presevation Act, 1879

Reported in : AIR1964Ker287

attack the group of four Sections, namely, Sections 48 to 51, contained in Chapter VII of the Kerala Forest Act, 1951, (Act IV of 1962), hereinafter to be referred to as the Kerala Act, as unconstitutional and as … Suktia-puram Sabhayogam v. State of Kefala, 1962 Ker LT 924 : (AIR 1963 Ker 101 (FB)), struck down the same Act as unconstitutional with reference … and, as such, ultra vires the powers of the State Legislature, and void.8. The petitioner further avers that Section 48 of the Kerala Act prohibits absolutely the capture of wild elephants by persons from their own property and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 1991

Deputy Commissioner Vs. Emmanuel Ramapuram

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-10-1991

Subject : Property

Acts : Coorg Land and Revenue Regulation, 1899 - Sections 29, 29(2), 48 and 110

Reported in : ILR1992KAR910; 1991(3)KarLJ297

Regulation as well as the provisions of the Karnataka Forest Act of 1963. As the learned Advocate General has in the course of his arguments … remarking that Tenure of the Jamma Malaigars might have to be decided in settlement proceedings under the Indian Forest Act, the Chief Commissioner thought it clear that their right was in the nature of a right of use … a certificate to the effect that he has purchased that property. Chapter VIII deals with the assessment and Section 48(1) dealing with liability of all land to assessment states that all land, to whatever purpose applied and wherever

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2004

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Sujit Kumar Rana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-20-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(3), 20, 29, 44(2A), 49(7), 50A to 59G, 62, 63, 67 and 68; Constitution of India - Articles 48A, 51A, 136, 226 and 300A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 6A(2), 6C, 6E and 7(1); Karnataka Forest Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR2004SC1851; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)258; (2004)3CALLT55(SC); [2004(4)JCR137(SC)]; JT2004(5)SC157; 2004(1)SCALE641; (2004)4SCC129

Kunchindammed ( : 2002CriLJ2565 ), this Court observed that even the expression 'sandalwood' as contained in the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 would include 'sandalwood oil'. This court in no uncertain terms held :'The Karnataka Forest Act is a special … S.B. Sinha, J.INTRODUCTION:1. Applicability of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing a proceeding for confiscation of forest-produce etc. under … S.B. Sinha, J.INTRODUCTION:1. Applicability of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing a proceeding for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2003

Estate Officer, (Divisional Forest Officer) Jammu Forest Division and ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Feb-06-2003

Subject : Environment

Acts : Jammu and Kashmir Forest Act, 1987 - Section 48A; ;Jammu and Kashmir Special Tribunal Act, 1988

Reported in : AIR2003J& K74,2003(1)JKJ730

that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear the appeal arising under Section 48-A of the Jammu and Kashmir Forest Act, 1987, the petitioner have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court with a plea that after the issuance … review petitions arising by or under the provisions of Jammu and Kashmir Grant of permanent Resident Certificate (Procedure)Act, 1963, or the rules framed thereunder.(3) The Tribunal shall also exercise all the jurisdiction, powers and authority in relation

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2013

G.V. Ananda and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, by Sub Rfo, Kodagu Dist ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2013

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Range, Shanivarasanthe Range, Kodagu District registered for the offences punishable under Sections 62, 71-A, 80, 104-A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Rules 144, 127-A r/w Rule 165 of Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969. 2. According to the case of … (This criminal petition is filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. with a prayer to enlarge the petitioners on bail in FOC No.48/12-13 and FIR

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2000

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Agricultural Marketing Produce Comcommi ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-18-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Delhi Agricultural Market Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 5, 5(7), (9), (10) and (14), 8, 9, 10, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 34, 35, 39 and 65; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(20) and 256(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) General Rules, 1978; Constitution of India - Article 239; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Delhi Development Act - Sections 3, 4, 5, 30, 37, 52, 56 and 59; Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(Del)298; [2001]250ITR369(Delhi)

came the decision of the apex court in CIT v. U. P. Forest Corporation : [1998]230ITR945(SC) . Again the principles in R. C. Jain's case … Bombay High Court examined the question whether the market comcommittee constituted under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, to which reference has been made, was a local authority. After examining various clauses of the Act, it … the market comcommittee with the approval of the director (section 22).(viii) Supervision of market comcommittee by the administrator (section 48) (viii) Issue of general or special directions by the director providing for performance of duties of common nature

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1991

Bhavani Tea and Produce Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-20-1991

Subject : Property

Acts : Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Sections 2(7), 2(15), 2(34), 2(38), 2(44), 2(47), 81 and 82; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 3; Madras Preservation of Private Forest Act, 1949 - Sections 1(2) and 2; Madras Preservation of Private Forest (Second Amendment) Act, 1954;

Reported in : JT1991(1)SC503; 1991(1)KLT666(SC); 1991(1)SCALE319; (1991)2SCC463; [1991]1SCR550

the case to show that the company's plantations area was a forest under the M.P.P.F. Act.19. The Kerala Forest Act, 1961 (Act 4 of 1962) was an Act to unify and amend the law relating to the protection … statement of objects and reasons also said that the private forests as defined in the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (1 of 1964) were exempt from the ceiling thereunder and that with high density of population there was … of the High Court of Kerala dated 10.9.1986 passed in MFA Nos. 48 and 291 of 198l. The appellant Bhavani Tea and Produce Co. Ltd., … the assent of the President on 23.8.1971, and as provided in its Section 1(3) it was deemed to have come into force on the 10th

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial