Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 46 · Page 1 of about 667 results (0.088 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 11 2026

Renil @ Rinil C vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-11-2026

to proceed in accordance with law. In the proceedings initiated by him under Section 71A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, he is required to satisfy himselfbased on the material produced before him about the involvement of the vehicle

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2000

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Agricultural Marketing Produce Comcommi ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-18-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Delhi Agricultural Market Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 5, 5(7), (9), (10) and (14), 8, 9, 10, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 34, 35, 39 and 65; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(20) and 256(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) General Rules, 1978; Constitution of India - Article 239; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Delhi Development Act - Sections 3, 4, 5, 30, 37, 52, 56 and 59; Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(Del)298; [2001]250ITR369(Delhi)

it did not function independently.10. Thereafter came the decision of the apex court in CIT v. U. P. Forest Corporation : [1998]230ITR945(SC) . Again the principles in R. C. Jain's case : (1981)ILLJ402SC were reiterated and by … Bombay High Court examined the question whether the market comcommittee constituted under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, to which reference has been made, was a local authority. After examining various clauses of the Act, it … Arijit Pasayat, C.J.1. All these references under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'), involve identical … market commit-tee (section 65)(xii) The State Government to supersede market commit-tee (section 46).(xiii) Power of administrator to amend the schedule (section 66)(xiii) Director to call

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1980

State of Gujarat and anr. Vs. Vaghela Dayabhai Chaturbhai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-05-1980

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Bombay Land Revenue Code; Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1921

Reported in : (1980)GLR773(SC); (1980)3SCC318; [1980]2SCR1182

of persons, in unalienated villages or unalienated portions of villages, for free pasturage for the village cattle, for forest reserves, or for any other public or municipal purpose; and lands assigned specially for any such purpose shall … be used as market yards under the management of market committees established under the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963 etc. Rule 35 of the Rules empowers the Collector to exempt from payment of land' revenue without any … included in a survey number can, save as otherwise provided in Sections 46 and 64, ordinarily be leased annually by auction to the highest bidder … without granting any compensation.5. Rent shall be fixed and payable according to Sections 6 and 7 of Government Resolution Revenue Department No. L.B.B. 3964-101585-G dated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 17 2026

T John vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-17-2026

Jamma Malai lands fall within the ambit of “statutory forest” under the scheme of the - 13 -Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. The finding appears to have been premised on the historical character of such lands, their alleged forest attributes, … them to file objections and challenge any adverse action taken pursuant to the report.13. The Deputy Commissioner invoked Section 136 ofthe Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, and directed deletion of the name of Petitioner No.1 from revenue … right to cultivate cardamom to be recorded, in terms of RSA No. 466 of 1980. According to him, the Division Bench did not reverse the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2023

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi /acb

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE … CBI/ACB/BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS120 READ WITH SECTION409 420, 434, 447, 468, 471 IPC AND UNDER SECTION132) READ WITH SECTIONS131)(c) AND (d) OF PREVENTION

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2023

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE … CBI/ACB/BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS120 READ WITH SECTION409 420, 434, 447, 468, 471 IPC AND UNDER SECTION132) READ WITH SECTIONS131)(c) AND (d) OF PREVENTION

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2023

Sri.s. Muthaiah Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE … CBI/ACB/BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS120 READ WITH SECTION409 420, 434, 447, 468, 471 IPC AND UNDER SECTION132) READ WITH SECTIONS131)(c) AND (d) OF PREVENTION

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2026

Sri Hanumantharaju vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-25-2026

7 decades, the respondent/State has sought to issue a notification dated 12.10.2023 under Section 5 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (for short Act, 1963) as per Annexure-B, calling upon the petitioners and various other persons who are in … 57 YEARS,7. SRI THIMMARAJU @ THIMMARAJAIAH S/O RANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,8. SRI HARISH S/O RAMAKRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,9. SMT PADAMMA W/O DINESH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, PETITIONER NOS. 1 TO 9 ARE R/O MADENAHALLI VILLAGE,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2023

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE … CBI/ACB/BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS120 READ WITH SECTION409 420, 434, 447, 468, 471 IPC AND UNDER SECTION132) READ WITH SECTIONS131)(c) AND (d) OF PREVENTION

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Education

THAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DEMAND AND COLLECT FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX UNDER SECTION98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 ON THE VALUE OF MINERAL SOLD BY THE PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF THE MINING LEASES GRANTED UNDER THE … & R.2) ***** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION98 OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT1993AND NOTIFICATION DT. 16.8.2008 PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE ON278.2008 VIDE ANNEXURE B DOES

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial