Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 45 · Page 1 of about 600 results (0.059 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

the provision of Article 246, Entry-54 of Seventh Schedule, List I-Union List of Constitution of India, the Karnataka Forest Act 1963 and the provisions of the Forest [Conservation] Act 1980 [Central Act]. This Writ Petition is filed under Article … etc., This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to declare that section 98a of the Karnataka Forest Act 1993 and notification dt. 16.8.2008 published in the Official Gazette on 27.8.2008 … recalled here that in Hingir Rampur Coal Company's case, AIR 1961 SC 459, the Supreme Court has stated that the scope of the Central Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 2009

Sri Anil Colaco S/O. J.S. Colaco, Coffee Planter Vs. the Authorized Of ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-26-2009

Subject : Environment

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 20, 29, 44, 44(2), 44(2A), 45, 58A, 62(1), 62(2), 62(3), 71A to 71G and 104A; Karnataka Forest (Amendment) Act, 1976; Andhra Pradesh Forest Act - Sections 44 and 45; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2009(5)KarLJ249

a security. It is further averred that the 2nd respondent initiated proceedings under Section 71(A) of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act'). The petitioner filed objections to the said proceedings and the 2nd respondent, without … the judgment reads as follows:12. A close, careful and combined reading of the various Sub-sections of Section 44, Section 45 and Section 58A of the Act as introduced or amended by Act 17 of 1976 leaves no doubt

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Education

THAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DEMAND AND COLLECT FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX UNDER SECTION98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 ON THE VALUE OF MINERAL SOLD BY THE PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF THE MINING LEASES GRANTED UNDER THE … & R.2) ***** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION98 OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT1993AND NOTIFICATION DT. 16.8.2008 PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE ON278.2008 VIDE ANNEXURE B DOES … COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE -:96. :- COMPANIES ACT, 1956, NO.3, LALEHZAR APARTMENTS, 45/1-2, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT82-276, I FLOOR, PAVANI

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 12 2012

Chandrappa Son of Subbe GowdA. Vs. the State of KarnatakA.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-12-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), (Cr.P.C) 1973 - Section 438; Karnataka Forest Act 1963 - Sections 24, 24E, 62, 104A; Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 - Sections 27, 51

to be registered in FOC No.45/11-12 for the offences punishable under Sections 24, 24E, 62, 104A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Rules 144, 165, 127A r/w Sections 27 and 51 of Wild Life Protection Act. 1972 and investigation … 1. In this petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C, the petitioner who has been arrayed as accused No.1 in FOC No.45/11-12 of Range Forest Officer

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 2007

Era Constructions (India) Limited Vs. Mr. D.K. Sharma, Prop. Keshav, S ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-25-2007

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 30, 34 and 75; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 19 - Schedule - Articles 1, 7 and 26; Banking Companies Act - Sections 45O

Reported in : 2008(1)ARBLR205(Delhi); 2008(100)DRJ712

one side, those on the other being merely complete or partial discharges of such obligations. In The Hindustan Forest Co. v. Lal Chand and Ors. : [1960]1SCR563 , the Supreme Court observed that the question of what … it would be fruitful to refer to Article 1 and Article 26 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963. Article 1 relates to suits in respect of balance due on a mutual open and current account, where … Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. This is a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as … 1950, the suit is not barred by limitation, having regard to Section 45(O) of the Banking Companies Act. The Courts below, thereforee, rightly answered issue

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2022

Union Of India Vs. M/s. Ganpati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. Tthrough Managing Di ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-23-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

(1985) 4 SCC573 this Court was concerned with the power of forfeiture under Section 44(2)(A) of Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967. Noting that Section 45 of the Forest Act prior to the amendment had a provision for civil

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2010

State of Orissa Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-05-2010

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 91(1) and 289; ;Madras Impartible Estate Act, 1904; ;General Clauses Act; ;Conveyancing Act, 1881; ;Orissa Estates Abolition Act, 1952; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 58; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 15 and 80; ;Government of India (Constitution of Orissa) Order, 1936 - Section 3(1), 3(2) and 3(3); ;Constitution of India - Articles 1(2), 3 and 131

to the boundaries as existing at the date of this Order, of any district, Agency, taluk, village, estate, forest or other area referred to in the said Schedule or otherwise with respect to the delimitation of the … only three years from the date of accrual of the right, as per Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The right, if any, accrued to the plaintiff on 01-04-1936, i.e., when the Province of Orissa was constituted. … contemplated in the First Schedule, Part I, Clause 2 (iv) read with Section 3(1) of the Orissa Order. Albeit, the disputed area is not territorially … of Tripura : [1964] 3 SCR 442, (B.P. Sinha, C.J., at p. 454):Is the President's Order in question an 'instrument' within the meaning of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2000

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Agricultural Marketing Produce Comcommi ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-18-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Delhi Agricultural Market Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 5, 5(7), (9), (10) and (14), 8, 9, 10, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 34, 35, 39 and 65; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(20) and 256(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) General Rules, 1978; Constitution of India - Article 239; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Delhi Development Act - Sections 3, 4, 5, 30, 37, 52, 56 and 59; Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(Del)298; [2001]250ITR369(Delhi)

it did not function independently.10. Thereafter came the decision of the apex court in CIT v. U. P. Forest Corporation : [1998]230ITR945(SC) . Again the principles in R. C. Jain's case : (1981)ILLJ402SC were reiterated and by … Bombay High Court examined the question whether the market comcommittee constituted under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, to which reference has been made, was a local authority. After examining various clauses of the Act, it … Arijit Pasayat, C.J.1. All these references under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'), involve identical … performance of duties in case of default by the market com-committee (section 45).(xii)The role of the administrator with regard to the bye laws by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2023

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi /acb

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … sanction order may be a guidance to prepare the valid sanction order…” 45 Such conclusion of the learned Special Judge also does not call for … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2023

Sri.s. Muthaiah Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … sanction order may be a guidance to prepare the valid sanction order…” 45 Such conclusion of the learned Special Judge also does not call for … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial