Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 42 · Page 1 of about 588 results (0.037 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 08 2007

Dirk India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mahagenco

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-08-2007

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Arbitration Act - Sections 9 and 11; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 41 and 42; Environmental Protection Act; Environmental Protection Rules

Reported in : 2007(5)BomCR207

14th September 1999, a notification was issued by the Government of India in the Ministry of Environment and Forest inter alia setting out guide-lines for the disposal of the fly ash. Fly ash, which at one time … negative injunction restraining sale to a third party could be granted under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.8. In order to support his submissions, Mr. Dada referred to and relied upon the following decisions:(i) (Sky Petroleum

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1977

Mohanlal Gangully and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-31-1977

Subject : Civil

Acts : West Bengal Zilla Parishads Act, 1963 - Section 42(2); ;West Bengal Zilla Parishads Rules - Rule 175

Reported in : AIR1978Cal12,82CWN411

with a notice by the Administrator, 24-Parganas Zilla Parishad under Section 42 of the West Bengal Zilla Pariahads Act, 1963 to register their boats and pay fee in respect thereof. The respondent No. 3 has been authorised by … from the reserved and protected forests of Sunderbans in 24-Parganas. In exercise of powers conferred under the Indian Forest Act, 1&27 and in particular Sections 32 and 41 rules have been framed for the control of transit of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2008

State of M.P. and ors. Vs. Madhukar Rao

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-09-2008

Subject : Environment

Acts : Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 39, 39(1), 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 50(1), 50(2), 50(3A), 50(4), 51, 51(4), 53 and 54; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 360 and 451; Wild Life (Protection) (Amendment) Act, 1991; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD63(SC); [2008(2)JCR86(SC)]; JT2008(1)SC364; 2008(2)KLT105(SC); 2008(1)SCALE231; 2008AIRSCW787; 2008(2)ICC175

the facts of the present case. The decision in Kunchindammed was rendered on the provisions of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. In that case, an order of confiscation of the vehicle was passed by the competent authority and the … Forest Department who registered a case being Offence No.6527/97 under Sections 39, 42, 43, 44, 49(Kha) and 51(Kha) of the Act. The four persons occupying … which the same question arises for consideration. The question is whether a vehicle or vessel etc. seized under Section 50(1)(c) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is put beyond the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 24 2008

Karnataka State Forest Industries Corporation Vs. Indian Rocks

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-24-2008

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 21(4), 50 and 62; Indian Telegraph Act; Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 - Rules 42 and 43(6); Indian Telegraph Rules; Karnataka Forest Rules, 1963; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 136, 162 and 226

Reported in : AIR2009SC684; 2008(2)CTLJ465(SC); JT2008(12)SC388; 2009(2)KarLJ193; (2009)1SCC150

unless it is covered by transit pass in accordance with the rules under Section 50 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. If any problems arise while lifting the blocks from site, necessary assistance will be provided if need be … not yield and result and the Respondent failed to obtain the mineral dispatch permits in terms of Rule 42 of the Rules. 9. It is humbly submitted that the Respondent Corporation appointed the Jadhav, Range Forest Officer

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2021

Sri. Ramappa @ Ramesh S/o. Dharmanna Madar Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Jun-22-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

THE PETITIONER IN BANAHATTI ROR CRIME NO.33/2020-21 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION80 84, 86 AND87OF KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963, RULE144AND145OF KARNATAKA FOREST RULES, 1969 AND SECTION379OF IPC, BY THE RESPONDENT RANGE FOREST OFFICER, BANAHATTI RANGE, BAGALKOTE DIVISION, … be arrested without a warrant by the officer who issued the requisition (2) Subject to the provisions of Section 42, no person concerned in a non-cognizable offence or against whom a complaint has been made or credible information

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2013

A.Chandrasekaran Vs. Yoha Securities Limited

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-04-2013

Subject : MRTP

Sethi and followed the decision of the Supreme Court in H.P. State Forest Company Ltd vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd {2009 (2) SCC252.19. In … that the period of limitation for filing a reference should be governed by the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963. But unfortunately, the reference to arbitration and the passing of the award happened before the said circular and … in Section 29(2), fell for consideration in a few cases. Though the expression ".local law". is defined in Section 42 of the Indian Penal Code, the same meaning cannot be adopted for the purpose of understanding the expression

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1977

Janu Chandra Waghmare and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-14-1977

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 31, 31-B, 31(2), 228A, 245, 246, 246(3), 248, 255, 301 to 307, 366, 367 and 368; Constitution of India (40th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(6), 2(7), 3, 4 to 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16, 16(1) and 17; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Sale of Trees by Occupants belonging to Scheduled Tribes (Regulation) Act, 1959 - Sections 5 and 6; Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 2(5), 2(6), 2(7), 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3

Reported in : AIR1978Bom119; (1977)79BOMLR499

Waghmare) was the proprietary Jagirdar and owner of the private forest comprised in Section Nos. 3, 16/1, 19, 42 and 147 situate in village Ambatha, Taluka Surgana, District Nasik. The said jahagir stood abolished under Section 3 … was passed on 28-10-1974. On 14-5-1975 the State Government issued a notification under Section 35(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 in respect of the 1st petitioner's said private forest.4, Further, during the pendency of the petition the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2017

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-15-2017

Subject : Right to Information

vs. Cantreads Pri­ vate Limited and others (1994) 4 SCC 455. This Court had occasion to consider Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. Caoutchouc or latex covers natural covering sheets of various grades or not, was the question under consider­ ation. … Lrs. And others, 2001 (4) SCC 262, came to be considered wherein this Court had occasion to consider Section 42 of Punjab Courts Act, 1918. This Court held that Article 254 of the Constitution would have no application

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2021

Smt Jeanne Pinto Vs. Deputy Conservator Of Forests

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-06-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

never as forest land, as can be seen from the statement showing Section 4 declared under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 areas included in forest reserve as per Deputy Commissioner Notification dated 05.06.2002, wherein the plaintiff’s survey numbers are … as it is totally unknown to law. Though the plaintiff is claiming the suit lands by way of 42 adverse possession against the forest department and she does not admit the suit lands as the forest lands

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2006

H.K. Basavaraju and ors. Vs. the Tahsildar and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-21-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 71; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 3 and 4

Reported in : 2006(6)KarLJ324

Forest Department, in the absence of an order by the State Government under Section 3 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and notification under Section 4 of the Act, the legal position is that the land continues to be … also to direct respondent 5 to hand over the possession of the land in Sy. Nos. 41 and 42 of Nidanur Village, making way to issue Saguvali Chit in favour of petitioners 1 to 9.2. Brief facts

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial