Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 4 · Page 1 of about 2,227 results (0.052 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 28 2008

Siddeshwara International Vs. State of Karnataka Represented by Its Se ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-28-2008

Subject : PropertyEnvironment

Acts : Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act; Karnataka Land Reforms Act; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 4, 33(2) and 35; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976; Forest Conservation Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 48A, 51A and 226; Constitution of India (Amendment) Act, 1976; Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986

Reported in : ILR2009KAR1356; 2009(3)KCCRSN99; 2009(4)AIRKarR367

shoal forest. The surrounding revenue land has been proposed to be declared as Reserve forest as per Karnataka Forest Act 1963. He has also given the floristic composition of the area.g) Hogarekhangiri is adjacent to the Yemmedoddi Tiger reserve … of thick forest mostly on steep sloppy area. This area of 280 acres adjoins the Yemmedoddi Tiger preserve (Section-4 notified forest under Karnataka Forest Act 1963) on South -Western side and surrounded by Section-4 proposed area of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 1979

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. Ayilammal Syamala Thamburatti and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-23-1979

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 to 24 and 29(2); Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 3(2), 8 and 8A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 2(9) and 2(14); Kerala Private Forests (Tribunal) Rules, 1972 - Rule 11

Reported in : AIR1980Ker82

can there be now any controversy as regards the applicability of Sections 4 - 24 of the Limitation Act, 1963, as provided for by Section … George Vadakkel, J.1. This appeal is preferred under Section 8A of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971, (hereinafter, the Act) from the decision of the Forest Tribunal, palghat, under Section … of limitation, and the answer thereto depends on the applicability or otherwise of Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to this appeal.2. It is not disputed that the Act is a 'special or local law' falling within

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2009

ibex Gallagher Praviate Ltd. Represented by Its Manager (Finance), Mr. ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-03-2009

Subject : Contract

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 109; Karnataka Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 82; Sale of Goods Act - Sections 54(4); Uttar Pradesh Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 - Sections 3; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964

Reported in : 2009(6)KarLJ687

(he concerned personnel of the respondent.6. However, the respondents having chosen to invoke Section 109 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and have sought to raise a dispute in respect of the contract. It is in this background that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 17 2026

T John vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-17-2026

Jamma Malai lands fall within the ambit of “statutory forest” under the scheme of the - 13 -Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. The finding appears to have been premised on the historical character of such lands, their alleged forest attributes, … or prohibit felling of trees and removal of forest produce; 23.32.5. Prescribe fees, royalties and other payments. 23.33. Sub-section (4) further provides that land placed under special protection under clause(ii) of sub-section (2) shall be called“protected forest” and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 2020

Joby Vettiyadan, vs State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-06-2020

so long as they remain vested in the Government, be deemed to be reserved forest constituted under Kerala Forest Act, 1961 and provisions of that Act shall so far as may be, apply to such private forest. It … of Kerala for the purpose of clause 1 of section 3(1) W.A.No.202 of 2020 & Cross Objection 33of Act, 1963. Section 66 of Act, 1963 deals with procedure for vesting of rights of religious, charitable or educational institutions in … appellants and therefore, the writ petition is not maintainable under law. It was further submitted that as per section 4 of Act, 1971, all private forests vested in the Government under sub-section (1) of section 3 shall, so

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 2020

State of Kerala vs Joby Vettiyadan,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-06-2020

so long as they remain vested in the Government, be deemed to be reserved forest constituted under Kerala Forest Act, 1961 and provisions of that Act shall so far as may be, apply to such private forest. It … of Kerala for the purpose of clause 1 of section 3(1) W.A.No.202 of 2020 & Cross Objection 33of Act, 1963. Section 66 of Act, 1963 deals with procedure for vesting of rights of religious, charitable or educational institutions in … appellants and therefore, the writ petition is not maintainable under law. It was further submitted that as per section 4 of Act, 1971, all private forests vested in the Government under sub-section (1) of section 3 shall, so

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2006

H.K. Basavaraju and ors. Vs. the Tahsildar and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-21-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 71; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 3 and 4

Reported in : 2006(6)KarLJ324

Forest Department, in the absence of an order by the State Government under Section 3 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and notification under Section 4 of the Act, the legal position is that the land continues to be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1992

Pioneer Rubber Plantation, Nilambur Vs. State of Kerala and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-24-1992

Subject : Environment

Acts : Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 133(1); States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 5; Madras Preservation of Private Forests Act, 1949; Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Sections 72, 82 and 84; Kerala Forest Act - Sections 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 and 15

Reported in : AIR1993SC192; JT1992(5)SC144; 1992(2)SCALE231; (1992)4SCC175; [1992]3SCR972; 1992(2)LC724(SC)

extent of the ceiling area applicable to him under Section 82 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963. Sub-section (4) of Section 3 states that for the purposes of Sub-sections (2) and (3) private forests shall be deemed … the Act then states that the private forests shall be deemed to be reserved forests under the Kerala Forest Act so long as they remain vested in the Government. Section 8 provides for settlement of disputes which arise … the appointed day excluding (A) lands which are gardens or nilams as defined in the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (1 of 1964); (B) lands which are used principally for the cultivation of tea, coffee, cocoa, rubber, cardamom

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 2025

Smt.Geetha Y vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-10-2025

2ND NOTICE DATED 18.11.2025 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-G1, ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 64-A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT 1963 AND THE FINAL NOTICE DATED 27.11.2025 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-G2, ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 64-A OF … HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 37320 OF 2025 (GM-FOR) BETWEEN:1. SMT.GEETHA Y D/O. YELLAPPA, AGED 42 YEARS, BELLARA VILLAGE, HULIYARA HOBLI, CHICKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 218.2. SMT. B.N. BHAGYAMMAW/O. RANGAIAH, AGED 59

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2009

V.S. Lad and Sons, a Registered Partnership Firm Rep. by Its Partner/R ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-13-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957; Karnataka Forest Act, 1962 - Sections 12(7)(4), 24, 62, 64, 73, 81 and 82; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 62A and 62B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969 - Rules 62A, 62B, 65, 146, 146(2) and 149; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3760; 2009(6)KarLJ430; 2009(3)KCCR2067; 2009(5)AIRKarR41; AIR2009NOC2599; 2009CriLJ3760(D.B)

assuming the respondents have got power to initiate action against the petitioner under Section 62A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (for short, 'the KF Act'), the same ought not to have been exercised arbitrarily, illegally and unreasonably against … area, have carried out illegal mining over 14.30 hectares of the region and by illegally dumping wastes in 4.1 hectares and using 9.7 hectares of region for other purposes and thereby have totally encroached 27.80 hectares of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial