Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 39 · Page 1 of about 750 results (0.120 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 25 2025

Mr. Mohammed Ashraf Alias Maviya Alim vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-25-2025

39, 50, 51, 51(B) OF THE WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT 1972 AND U/S 24, 62 OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT 1963 PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS COURT, KUNDAPURA. THIS PETITION, COMING … 3 in WLOR No.45/2024-25 registered byShankaranarayana Range Forest Officer, Kundapura Division, Udupi Taluk, for the offences punishable under Sections 2(16), 9, 39, 50 and 51(B) of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 and Sections 24 and 62 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2008

State of M.P. and ors. Vs. Madhukar Rao

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-09-2008

Subject : Environment

Acts : Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 39, 39(1), 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 50(1), 50(2), 50(3A), 50(4), 51, 51(4), 53 and 54; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 360 and 451; Wild Life (Protection) (Amendment) Act, 1991; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD63(SC); [2008(2)JCR86(SC)]; JT2008(1)SC364; 2008(2)KLT105(SC); 2008(1)SCALE231; 2008AIRSCW787; 2008(2)ICC175

the facts of the present case. The decision in Kunchindammed was rendered on the provisions of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. In that case, an order of confiscation of the vehicle was passed by the competent authority and the … the Forest Department who registered a case being Offence No.6527/97 under Sections 39, 42, 43, 44, 49(Kha) and 51(Kha) of the Act. The four persons … which the same question arises for consideration. The question is whether a vehicle or vessel etc. seized under Section 50(1)(c) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is put beyond the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 1989

Nagesh Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-18-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(38); Cattle-trespass Act, 1871 - Sections 20; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 26(2), 29, 29(2), 39(2), 177, 313, 325(1) 325(3) and 482; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 2(9), 50, 87, 87(1), 87(2), 104 and 104E; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 411

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2234; ILR1989KAR3058; 1989(3)KarLJ93

30-9-1987 challenging the jurisdiction of the learned Magistrate to try the offences under Chap. X of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (the Act for short), is challenged. 2. The record and proceedings in C.C. No. 3336/86 and the record … the Act punishable under S. 87(2), and the offence punishable under S. 411 of the Penal Code. 16. Section 2(9) of the Act defines the expression 'Magistrate' as Magistrate of the first or second class. 17. The … the Penal Code. There is also enlargement of the definition in S. 39(2) of the Code. 20. Having regard to the definition of the 'offence',

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 18 2025

M/S. S. M. Enterprises vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-18-2025

TAX AT THE RATE OF 12 PERCENT OF THE SALE CONSIDERATION AMOUNT UNDER SECTION 98-A(1) OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 IN RESPECT OF THE TIMBER AND FOREST PRODUCE AUCTIONED/SOLD BY THE FOREST DEPARTMENT IN DIFFERENT GOVERNMENT DEPOTS IN … demand and collect 'Forest Development Tax' at the rate of 12% of the sale consideration amount under Section 39-A(1) of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 in respect of the timber and forest produce auctioned/sold by the Forest

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2005

Executive Engineer and anr. Vs. Sherif Mohammad I. Shaikh and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-06-2005

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 - Sections 280; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2) - Schedule - Article 116; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 8A; Private Forest Act; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 39(1); Calcutta City Civil Courts Act - Sections 8; Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act - Sections 6; General Clauses Act - Sections 10

Reported in : AIR2005Bom308; 2005(3)ALLMR677; 2005(4)BomCR649

appeal or application by such special or local law. There the High Court found chat in the Private Forest Act, referred to above, there was no provision which specifically excluded any of the provisions of Sections 4 to … The Kerala High Court, firstly, came to the conclusion that Sections 4 to 24 (inclusive) of the Limitation Act, 1963, shall, to the extent to which these provisions have not been expressly excluded by a special or local … them. Before filing the suit the original plaintiff gave a notice under Section 280 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 (hereinafter … that case the question was of limitation to file appeal under Section 39(1)(vi) of Arbitration Act, 1940. Section 39(1) does not provide for any period

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2014

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-17-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

that petitioner's land W.P(C) No.26691 of 2010, etc. -:184. :- are lying contiguous to or encircled by reserved forest, vested forest or any other land owned by the Government does not furnish any valid reason for classification … relevant to note. The Apex Court in the said case had occasion to consider the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963. Section 6C was introduced with effect from 07.07.1979. W.P(C) No.26691 of 2010, etc. -:255. :- Section 74 of the … 2003, which contains provision giving effect to the directive principles in Article 39(b) of the Constitution, shall also be treated to have been assented by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2026

T John vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-17-2026

Jamma Malai lands fall within the ambit of “statutory forest” under the scheme of the - 13 -Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. The finding appears to have been premised on the historical character of such lands, their alleged forest attributes, … them to file objections and challenge any adverse action taken pursuant to the report.13. The Deputy Commissioner invoked Section 136 ofthe Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, and directed deletion of the name of Petitioner No.1 from revenue … the timber was given after the sale. So far as Sy. No. 39/2 is concerned, it does not find a place in Exts. P3 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 05 2026

Smt R H Usha vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-05-2026

BY THE R1 AUTHORITY, IN THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN UNDER SECTION 64-A(3) OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 (ACT FOR BREVITY) VIDE APPEAL NO. 361 OF 202223 AS PER ANNEXURE-A; ii) SETTING SIDE THE IMPUGNEDORDER DATED … BANGALORE RANGE, BANGALORE, RG25, 2V3, BANNERUGATTA, KAGGALIPURA ROAD, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA-560 082.4. DEPUTY RANGE FOREST OFFICERNELAMANGALA RANGE, BANGALORE RURAL, 39VV+H2G, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA-562 123. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KIRAN V. RON, AAG FOR SRI. R.A. MACHAKANNUR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2009

Mspl Limited, Rep by Its Executive Director. Vs. the State of Karnatak ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-31-2009

Subject : Mines And Minerals

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 226, 227; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 59, 30, 7A(1), 60, 24A95); Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 30, 11(2), 17A

Reported in : 2009(1)KCCR5(SN)

context of the various statutory enactments such as Forest Act, 1927 [and in the case of Karnataka, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 also] Forest [Conservation] Act, 1980, Environment [Protection] Act, 1986, Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 and the supporting Rules both … Director of Mines & Geology, Government of A.P., (1983) 3 Andh LT 39; M/s. Anupama Minerals v/s Union of India, AIR 1986 Andh Prqa 225; … central government in terms of the communication dated 6-12-2004 [copy at Annexure-K to the writ petition] as per Section 5(1) of the Act and as no more land is available for grant of lease in favour of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2025

M T Ranjith vs the Chief Conservator of Forests

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-17-2025

and Survey Nos.38 and 39 of Banavara Village of Chikkamagalore District (2.90 kms). He further submits that under Section 2(2) of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, 'district forest' would include all lands at the disposal of the … rejecting the application of the petitioner for shifting of the saw mill is incorrect and against the Karnataka Forest Act,1963 and the Rules made thereunder as well as the judgmentof this Court dated 12.06.2019 passed in W.P.No.54476/2016 c/w

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial