Advanced Search Results
Kanyakumari District Planters Association, Nagarcoil rep., by its Secr ...
Chennai
Mar-10-2016
Land Acquisition
State. The statement of objects and reasons stated that the private forest as defined in Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, were exempted from ceiling thereunder and that with high density of population, there was scarcity of lands and … effect an Act purported to acquire forest land without payment of compensation. 36. In paragraph 18 of the judgment in Bhavani Tea, reference has been … regular and systematic cultivation. Referring to the definition of 'Forest' as defined under Section 2(aa) of the Private Forest Act, it was submitted that a word 'Forest' as understood in common parlance is a large uncultivated tract of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNk Rajendra Mohan Vs. Thirvamadi Rubber Co. Ltd and Ors
Supreme Court of India
Jul-02-2015
Land Acquisition
etc, the pleaded case being that the suit land had belonged to their Tarwad and was a private forest. On 21.6.1918, an area of 963.75 acres was leased out to one Mr. Campbell Hunt for a period … under the lease deed or the provisions of the Kerala Land Reforms Act 1964 (hereinafter referred to as Act 1963), brought into force on and from 01.04.1964 or any other tenancy laws prior thereto. The plaintiffs averred, that … thus stood excluded from the applicability of Act 1963 in terms of Section 3 (1) (vii) thereof, as it was granted to Mr. Campbell Hunt … possession of their Tarwad. The lease which was for a period of 36 years with effect from 01.04.1918 lapsed with efflux of time and the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Kerala and anr. Vs. K. Thomas Sebastian
Kerala
Oct-23-1997
Property
Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 8B; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) (Amendment) Act, 1986
AIR1998Ker44
for review of decisions of Tribunal :-- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or in the Limitation Act, 1963 (Central Act 36 of 1963), or in any other law for the time being in force, or in … Dhinakar, J.1. The only question thatarises for consideration in this M.F.A. is whether the Forest Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain a petition under Section 8-B of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
K.K. Vasant Vs. State of Karnataka and Another
Karnataka
Jan-29-1991
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 32, 133 and 226; Karnataka Forest Act, 1964 - Sections 1; Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976; Forest Act, 1963; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Environment Protection Act, 1986
AIR1992Kant256; ILR1991KAR1301; 1991(2)KarLJ518
intention of filing the writ petition had arisen in view of the absence of the provisions in the Forest Act, 1963 (apparently KaranatakaForest Act, 1963) to keep a check on the action of the respondents in order to achieve
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar
Supreme Court of India
Mar-20-1969
PropertyCivil
Chhota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 - Sections 89; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 4; Indian Forest Act, 1929 - Sections 29
1969(1)LC296(SC)
issued by the Governor of Bihar in exercise of the power conferred by Section 29 of the Indian Forest Act 1929, hereinafter called the 'Forest Act'. According to this notification, forest land and waste land in the district … to the aforesaid land in possession of the appellant. On March 21, 1963 the Settlement Officer passed an order that the plot should be recorded … the draft record of rights or of any order or decision under Section 83 & Section 85 or Section 36 revise the same whether it was made by himself or by any other revenue officer but not so
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjeet Singh Grewal Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-28-2001
Constitution
Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 14, 17, 29, 31, 31(1), 42, 43, 56, 56(1), 67, 68, to 78, 81, 82, 148, 179 and 181; Constitution of India - Article 226; Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 3(2), 5, 10, 11 and 12; Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development (General) Rules, 1995 - Rule 22; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4 and 5-A; Land Preservation Act; Forest Act; Punjab Scheduled Roads, and Controlled Areas Restrictions of Unregulated Development Act, 1963; Punjab Urban Estates (Development and Regulation) Act, 1964; Punjab Housing Development Board Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 15 and 16; Tamil Nadu State Housing Board Act, 1961 - Sections 35, 35(2) and (3) and 36
AIR2001P& H261
A large part of this land is covered by the provisions of the Land Preservation Act and the Forest Act. Chunks of this land have been exchanging hands at a very low rate. The second category of land … deserves notice that the statute specially repeals the Punjab Scheduled Roads, and Controlled Areas Restrictions of Unregulated Development Act, 1963, and the Punjab Urban Estates (Development and Regulation) Act, 1964. It is further provided that the 'Punjab Housing … agreed upon. The Board shall execute such scheme as if it is provided by the Housing Board Act. Section 36 empowers the Government to transfer to the Housing Board.'Section 36 in the words of their lordships provided that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhavani Tea and Produce Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-20-1991
Property
Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Sections 2(7), 2(15), 2(34), 2(38), 2(44), 2(47), 81 and 82; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 3; Madras Preservation of Private Forest Act, 1949 - Sections 1(2) and 2; Madras Preservation of Private Forest (Second Amendment) Act, 1954;
JT1991(1)SC503; 1991(1)KLT666(SC); 1991(1)SCALE319; (1991)2SCC463; [1991]1SCR550
the case to show that the company's plantations area was a forest under the M.P.P.F. Act.19. The Kerala Forest Act, 1961 (Act 4 of 1962) was an Act to unify and amend the law relating to the protection … statement of objects and reasons also said that the private forests as defined in the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (1 of 1964) were exempt from the ceiling thereunder and that with high density of population there was … 8, 11, 14, 17, 18, 22, 23, 25, 28, 30, 31, 33, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 44, 46, 50, 51, 51A, 55, 58, … the assent of the President on 23.8.1971, and as provided in its Section 1(3) it was deemed to have come into force on the 10th
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...
Karnataka
Dec-03-2015
Education
THAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DEMAND AND COLLECT FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX UNDER SECTION98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 ON THE VALUE OF MINERAL SOLD BY THE PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF THE MINING LEASES GRANTED UNDER THE … & R.2) ***** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION98 OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT1993AND NOTIFICATION DT. 16.8.2008 PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE ON278.2008 VIDE ANNEXURE B DOES … 31191/2008, 31227/2008, 31228/2008, 31229/2008, 31230/2008, 31234/2008, 31235/2008, 31266/2008, 31327/2008, 31439/2008, 31577/2008 (GM-MM-S), 368/2009 (GM-FOR), -:2. :- 863/2009, 6721/2009, 10712/2009, 16237/2009, 35251/2009 (GM-MM-S), 60230/2009 (GM-FOR), 15782/2010,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...
Karnataka
Dec-03-2015
Land Acquisition
Matched in: Parties National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional Manager K. Praveen Kumar and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, by its Secretary to the Forest, Ecology and Environment Department and Others
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt Jeanne Pinto Vs. Deputy Conservator Of Forests
Karnataka
Jan-06-2021
Land Acquisition
never as forest land, as can be seen from the statement showing Section 4 declared under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 areas included in forest reserve as per Deputy Commissioner Notification dated 05.06.2002, wherein the plaintiff’s survey numbers are … 1980, and in view of the dictum of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of T.N.Godavarman, supra. 3635. It is not in dispute that all the suit schedule properties totally measuring 68.33 guntas are government lands.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »