Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 34 · Page 1 of about 770 results (0.086 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 29 2012

K.M Thimmaiah So MuddappA. Vs. the Station House Officer Ponnampet Pol ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-29-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 406, 408, 420, 465, 468, 471, 477A, 379, 34; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 62, 71(A), 144, 104(A); Karnataka Forest Rules - Rule 127(A), 165; Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976 - Sections 8, 15, 19

420, 465, 468, 471, 477-A, 379 r/w 34 of IPC, Sections 62, 71(A), 144, 104(A) of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Rule 127(A) and 165 of the Karnataka Forest Rules and Sections 8, 15 and 19 of the … is accused No .3 has Crime No.160/ 2011 registered by Ponnampet police Madikeri for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 408, 420, 465, 468, 471, 477-A, 379 r/w 34 of IPC, Sections 62, 71(A), 144, 104(A) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 1990

Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-20-1990

Subject : Environment

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 3 to 27, 28 and 29 to 34; Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953 - Sections 27; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 1 and 7(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 4 and 7(1); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Himachal Pradesh Private Forest Act, 1954 - Sections 4, 5, 6 and 11; Land Holdings Act, 1972; Evidence Act - Sections 92

Reported in : AIR1990SC1833; JT1990(3)SC215; 1990(2)SCALE95; (1990)4SCC320; [1990]3SCR469

held that the suit was neither barred by limitation nor on account of Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963. The other technical objections to the maintainability of the suit were spurned and the learned Trial Judge decreed … On 25th February, 1952 the Government of Himachal Pradesh issued a Notification under Section 29 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 declaring that the provisions of Chapter IV of the said enactment shall apply to all forest lands

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1991

Bhavani Tea and Produce Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-20-1991

Subject : Property

Acts : Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Sections 2(7), 2(15), 2(34), 2(38), 2(44), 2(47), 81 and 82; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 3; Madras Preservation of Private Forest Act, 1949 - Sections 1(2) and 2; Madras Preservation of Private Forest (Second Amendment) Act, 1954;

Reported in : JT1991(1)SC503; 1991(1)KLT666(SC); 1991(1)SCALE319; (1991)2SCC463; [1991]1SCR550

the case to show that the company's plantations area was a forest under the M.P.P.F. Act.19. The Kerala Forest Act, 1961 (Act 4 of 1962) was an Act to unify and amend the law relating to the protection … statement of objects and reasons also said that the private forests as defined in the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (1 of 1964) were exempt from the ceiling thereunder and that with high density of population there was … Act. plot Nos. 4, 5, 7, 10, 19, 20, 21, 27, 32, 34, 42, 43, 45, 47, 52, 53, 54, 57, 60, 66 and 67 … the assent of the President on 23.8.1971, and as provided in its Section 1(3) it was deemed to have come into force on the 10th

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 07 2026

State of Karnataka vs Mahamed Rafiq

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-07-2026

Furthermore, the investigating officer has notcomplied with the mandatory provisions of section 62(3) of Chapter IX of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. After seizure of the property, the investigating officer has not intimated the same to the concerned officer under … commission of offence punishable under sections 86 and 87 of Karnataka Forest Act and section 379 read with section 34 ofIndian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 1 year 6 months and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2013

A.Chandrasekaran Vs. Yoha Securities Limited

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-04-2013

Subject : MRTP

Sethi and followed the decision of the Supreme Court in H.P. State Forest Company Ltd vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd {2009 (2) SCC252.19. In … that the period of limitation for filing a reference should be governed by the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963. But unfortunately, the reference to arbitration and the passing of the award happened before the said circular and … 1.M/s.Yoha Securities Limited, T.Nagar, Chennai-17. 2.Mr.M.V.Badrinath, Sole Arbitrator, National Stock Exchange of India Limited Chenna-4. ...Respondents Petition under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside the arbitration award dated 5.11.2007 in AM.No.CM/C00592007 passed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2007

Japani Sahoo Vs. Chandra Sekhar Mohanty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 114, 115, 131 and 132; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 160, 161, 294, 323, 324, 325, 336, 341, 427, 448, 491, 500 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156, 156(3), 202, 204, 466-473 and 482; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21

Reported in : AIR2007SC2762; 2007CriLJ4068; 2007(4)CTC740; JT2007(9)SC471; 2007(3)KLT760(SC); 2007(9)SCALE400; 2007(2)LC941(SC)

offence in question alleged to have been committed by the accused was punishable under Section 33 of the Forest Act, 1927 of illicit felling of trees. The offence was punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend … aut locus occurred regi (lapse of time is no bar to Crown in proceeding against offenders). The Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to criminal proceedings unless there are express and specific provisions to that effect, for instance, … 1981 and the Magistrate took cognizance for offences punishable under Sections 448, 341 and 323, IPC on March 12, 1982 after the expiry of period

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2014

Subray Narayan Prabhu Dessai and Another Vs. Government of Goa, Throug ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Jan-20-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

section 14(3), Section 14(4), Section 95, Section 98, Section 105, Section 112, Section 113, Section 115 – Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 58 - Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34 - Forest Act, 1927 - Section 4, … is also the case of the defendant that notification in that regard was first issued on 30/6/1988 under Forest Act in Official Gazette and then further notification u/s 6 was also issued. It is the case of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2025

Arun S/O. Fakkirappa Dayavanoor vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Feb-13-2025

ENLARGE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 ON REGULAR BAIL FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 86 AND 87 OF KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 AND UNDER SECTION 303(2) OF BNS ACT IN KESHVAPUR P.S., IN CRIME NO.212/2024 (NOW TRANSFERRED TO HUBBALLI RURAL

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 2020

Joby Vettiyadan, vs State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-06-2020

so long as they remain vested in the Government, be deemed to be reserved forest constituted under Kerala Forest Act, 1961 and provisions of that Act shall so far as may be, apply to such private forest. It … of Kerala for the purpose of clause 1 of section 3(1) W.A.No.202 of 2020 & Cross Objection 33of Act, 1963. Section 66 of Act, 1963 deals with procedure for vesting of rights of religious, charitable or educational institutions in … PALAKKAD. 33 ELIYAMMA, AGED 39 YEARS VATTUKALAHIL HOUSE, JELLIPPARA P.O., KURUKKANKUNDU, PALAKKAD. 34 ANNAKKUTTY, AGED 63 YEARS ERUMATHANATH HOUSE, JELLIPPARA P.O., KURUKKANKUNDU, PALAKKAD. 35 CHINNAMMA

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 2020

State of Kerala vs Joby Vettiyadan,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-06-2020

so long as they remain vested in the Government, be deemed to be reserved forest constituted under Kerala Forest Act, 1961 and provisions of that Act shall so far as may be, apply to such private forest. It … of Kerala for the purpose of clause 1 of section 3(1) W.A.No.202 of 2020 & Cross Objection 33of Act, 1963. Section 66 of Act, 1963 deals with procedure for vesting of rights of religious, charitable or educational institutions in … PALAKKAD. 33 ELIYAMMA, AGED 39 YEARS VATTUKALAHIL HOUSE, JELLIPPARA P.O., KURUKKANKUNDU, PALAKKAD. 34 ANNAKKUTTY, AGED 63 YEARS ERUMATHANATH HOUSE, JELLIPPARA P.O., KURUKKANKUNDU, PALAKKAD. 35 CHINNAMMA

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial