Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 33 · Page 1 of about 702 results (0.034 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 20 2012

The Dy. Commissioner and Another Vs. Gidda and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-20-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227; Karnataka (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955 ; Mysore (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955. ; Mysore Forest Regulation, 1900 - Section 35 (1)(3), 2(2), 33; Karnataka Forest Act 1963 - Section 117, 106, 6; KCRIA Act - Section 3, 9(1), 3(g), 3(b), 7, 8; Karnataka Land Grant Rules

Reported in : 2012ILR(Kar)2275

to forests and forest produce in the State of Karnataka. In that regard, a reference to the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 would indicate that the term ‘Reserved Forest’ is contained therein for the first time and Chapter-II relates to … hereinafter provided”.(emphasis supplied)13. In contra distinction to the above, the term ‘District Forest’ defined in Section 2(2) and Section 33 relating to District Forest in the same Act uses the phrase “land at the disposal of Government” while

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 1971

C. Rangappa Lachmiah and ors. Vs. the Range Forest Officer, Raichur an ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-25-1971

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mysore Forest Rules, 1969 - Rules 163, 163(1), 163(2), 164 and 165; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Mysore Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 30, 33, 38, 50, 50(2), 54(3), 59, 97, 101 and 102; Banking Companies Act, 1949 - Sections 10; Mysore Forest Act, 1900; Rice Milling Industry (Regulation) Act, 1958 - Sections 5 and 6(1); Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 10(1)

Reported in : AIR1972Kant76; AIR1972Mys76

Matched in: Parties C. Rangappa Lachmiah and ors. Vs. the Range Forest Officer, Raichur and ors.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2008

Siddeshwara International Vs. State of Karnataka Represented by Its Se ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-28-2008

Subject : PropertyEnvironment

Acts : Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act; Karnataka Land Reforms Act; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 4, 33(2) and 35; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976; Forest Conservation Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 48A, 51A and 226; Constitution of India (Amendment) Act, 1976; Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986

Reported in : ILR2009KAR1356; 2009(3)KCCRSN99; 2009(4)AIRKarR367

Matched in: Parties Siddeshwara International Vs. State of Karnataka Represented by Its Secretary, Department of Forest Ecology and Environment and ors.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 27 2007

Japani Sahoo Vs. Chandra Sekhar Mohanty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 114, 115, 131 and 132; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 160, 161, 294, 323, 324, 325, 336, 341, 427, 448, 491, 500 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156, 156(3), 202, 204, 466-473 and 482; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21

Reported in : AIR2007SC2762; 2007CriLJ4068; 2007(4)CTC740; JT2007(9)SC471; 2007(3)KLT760(SC); 2007(9)SCALE400; 2007(2)LC941(SC)

offence in question alleged to have been committed by the accused was punishable under Section 33 of the Forest Act, 1927 of illicit felling of trees. The offence was punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend … aut locus occurred regi (lapse of time is no bar to Crown in proceeding against offenders). The Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to criminal proceedings unless there are express and specific provisions to that effect, for instance,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2018

Kishore Kumar vs.high Court of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-29-2018

Subject : Education

Evidence Act, 1872 and indicated that option (2) is the correct answer, however, overlooked that by virtue of Section 33 (1) (a) read with Section 33 (4) of the Registration Act, 1908 even a registered power of attorney … to familiarize' themselves of the African war in grassland and small dense forests where the rule was fire first and apologize afterwards. In this land … from the original date.'' 14. It is stated that the query pertains to Section 21 of the Limitation Act,1963 and therefore, the correct answer option should be (1) and not (3) furnished by the DHC impugned model

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2021

Smt Jeanne Pinto Vs. Deputy Conservator Of Forests

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-06-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

never as forest land, as can be seen from the statement showing Section 4 declared under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 areas included in forest reserve as per Deputy Commissioner Notification dated 05.06.2002, wherein the plaintiff’s survey numbers are … land in Sy.No.188 and 17 acres 20 guntas of coffee land in Sy.No.189 and suit item No.2 measuring 33 acres 8 guntas of coffee land in Sy.Nos.185, 188, 189 and 229 of Heruru village, Megunda Hobli, Koppa

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1977

State of Karnataka Vs. Vedavati

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-25-1977

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1978CriLJ1375

to the Government on 25-l2-1974, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 33 (v) of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 read with Rules 25 (3) and 43 of the Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969. The accused appeared in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Education

THAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DEMAND AND COLLECT FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX UNDER SECTION98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 ON THE VALUE OF MINERAL SOLD BY THE PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF THE MINING LEASES GRANTED UNDER THE … & R.2) ***** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION98 OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT1993AND NOTIFICATION DT. 16.8.2008 PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE ON278.2008 VIDE ANNEXURE B DOES

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional Manager K. Praveen Kumar and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, by its Secretary to the Forest, Ecology and Environment Department and Others

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1991

Bhavani Tea and Produce Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-20-1991

Subject : Property

Acts : Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Sections 2(7), 2(15), 2(34), 2(38), 2(44), 2(47), 81 and 82; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 3; Madras Preservation of Private Forest Act, 1949 - Sections 1(2) and 2; Madras Preservation of Private Forest (Second Amendment) Act, 1954;

Reported in : JT1991(1)SC503; 1991(1)KLT666(SC); 1991(1)SCALE319; (1991)2SCC463; [1991]1SCR550

the case to show that the company's plantations area was a forest under the M.P.P.F. Act.19. The Kerala Forest Act, 1961 (Act 4 of 1962) was an Act to unify and amend the law relating to the protection … statement of objects and reasons also said that the private forests as defined in the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (1 of 1964) were exempt from the ceiling thereunder and that with high density of population there was … 6, 8, 11, 14, 17, 18, 22, 23, 25, 28, 30, 31, 33, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 44, 46, 50, 51, 51A, 55, … the assent of the President on 23.8.1971, and as provided in its Section 1(3) it was deemed to have come into force on the 10th

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial