Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 33 · Page 1 of about 810 results (0.059 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 20 2012

The Dy. Commissioner and Another Vs. Gidda and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-20-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227; Karnataka (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955 ; Mysore (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955. ; Mysore Forest Regulation, 1900 - Section 35 (1)(3), 2(2), 33; Karnataka Forest Act 1963 - Section 117, 106, 6; KCRIA Act - Section 3, 9(1), 3(g), 3(b), 7, 8; Karnataka Land Grant Rules

Reported in : 2012ILR(Kar)2275

to forests and forest produce in the State of Karnataka. In that regard, a reference to the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 would indicate that the term ‘Reserved Forest’ is contained therein for the first time and Chapter-II relates to … hereinafter provided”.(emphasis supplied)13. In contra distinction to the above, the term ‘District Forest’ defined in Section 2(2) and Section 33 relating to District Forest in the same Act uses the phrase “land at the disposal of Government” while

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2026

T John vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-17-2026

action is traceable to statutory authority and does not suffer from want of jurisdiction. 23.31. He refers to Section 33 of the Karnataka Forest Act 1963, which is reproduced hereunder for easy reference;33. Power to make rules for … Jamma Malai lands fall within the ambit of “statutory forest” under the scheme of the - 13 -Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. The finding appears to have been premised on the historical character of such lands, their alleged forest attributes,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 1971

C. Rangappa Lachmiah and ors. Vs. the Range Forest Officer, Raichur an ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-25-1971

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mysore Forest Rules, 1969 - Rules 163, 163(1), 163(2), 164 and 165; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Mysore Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 30, 33, 38, 50, 50(2), 54(3), 59, 97, 101 and 102; Banking Companies Act, 1949 - Sections 10; Mysore Forest Act, 1900; Rice Milling Industry (Regulation) Act, 1958 - Sections 5 and 6(1); Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 10(1)

Reported in : AIR1972Kant76; AIR1972Mys76

Forest Act, 1963, which came into force on 1-1-1969. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sections 30, 33, 38, 50, 59, 97, 101 and 102 of the Act, the Government of Mysore made the Rules which … down Rules 163 and 164 of the Rules as being ultra vires of Section 50 of the Mysore Forest Act. 1963. (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and as being violative of clauses (g) and (f) of Article 19(1)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 25 2024

Shri.Javed Akthar M Shaik vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Apr-25-2024

NO.2 TO 4 IN SO FAR LEVYING OF FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX AS PER SECTION 98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT 1963 REFUND BY R1,-6- R2 TO R4 III) SEEKING WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE … A. IN WP.NO.102682/2021 WOOD CRAFT, H.NO.385, BHARAT NAGAR, SHAHAPUR, BELAGAVI REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR ASIF MUSTAK PEERJAD, AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. VISHNU GALLI, VADAGAON, BELAGAVI-590005. (BY SRI. VITHAL S.TELI, ADVOCATE)1. THE CHIEF PRINCIPAL CONSERVATOR OF

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2024

Madani Furniture Works vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Apr-25-2024

NO.2 TO 4 IN SO FAR LEVYING OF FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX AS PER SECTION 98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT 1963 REFUND BY R1,-6- R2 TO R4 III) SEEKING WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE … A. IN WP.NO.102682/2021 WOOD CRAFT, H.NO.385, BHARAT NAGAR, SHAHAPUR, BELAGAVI REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR ASIF MUSTAK PEERJAD, AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. VISHNU GALLI, VADAGAON, BELAGAVI-590005. (BY SRI. VITHAL S.TELI, ADVOCATE)1. THE CHIEF PRINCIPAL CONSERVATOR OF

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2024

Balkrishna Mahadev Hurude vs the Chief Principal Conservator of Forest ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Apr-25-2024

NO.2 TO 4 IN SO FAR LEVYING OF FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX AS PER SECTION 98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT 1963 REFUND BY R1,-6- R2 TO R4 III) SEEKING WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE … A. IN WP.NO.102682/2021 WOOD CRAFT, H.NO.385, BHARAT NAGAR, SHAHAPUR, BELAGAVI REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR ASIF MUSTAK PEERJAD, AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. VISHNU GALLI, VADAGAON, BELAGAVI-590005. (BY SRI. VITHAL S.TELI, ADVOCATE)1. THE CHIEF PRINCIPAL CONSERVATOR OF

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2024

Sri. Ashok S/O Balappa Jalihal vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Apr-25-2024

NO.2 TO 4 IN SO FAR LEVYING OF FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX AS PER SECTION 98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT 1963 REFUND BY R1,-6- R2 TO R4 III) SEEKING WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE … A. IN WP.NO.102682/2021 WOOD CRAFT, H.NO.385, BHARAT NAGAR, SHAHAPUR, BELAGAVI REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR ASIF MUSTAK PEERJAD, AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. VISHNU GALLI, VADAGAON, BELAGAVI-590005. (BY SRI. VITHAL S.TELI, ADVOCATE)1. THE CHIEF PRINCIPAL CONSERVATOR OF

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2024

Yellapur Furniture by Its Proprietor vs the Chief Principal

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Apr-25-2024

NO.2 TO 4 IN SO FAR LEVYING OF FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX AS PER SECTION 98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT 1963 REFUND BY R1,-6- R2 TO R4 III) SEEKING WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE … A. IN WP.NO.102682/2021 WOOD CRAFT, H.NO.385, BHARAT NAGAR, SHAHAPUR, BELAGAVI REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR ASIF MUSTAK PEERJAD, AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. VISHNU GALLI, VADAGAON, BELAGAVI-590005. (BY SRI. VITHAL S.TELI, ADVOCATE)1. THE CHIEF PRINCIPAL CONSERVATOR OF

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2024

Sri Vasudeva Saw MILL vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Apr-25-2024

NO.2 TO 4 IN SO FAR LEVYING OF FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX AS PER SECTION 98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT 1963 REFUND BY R1,-6- R2 TO R4 III) SEEKING WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE … A. IN WP.NO.102682/2021 WOOD CRAFT, H.NO.385, BHARAT NAGAR, SHAHAPUR, BELAGAVI REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR ASIF MUSTAK PEERJAD, AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. VISHNU GALLI, VADAGAON, BELAGAVI-590005. (BY SRI. VITHAL S.TELI, ADVOCATE)1. THE CHIEF PRINCIPAL CONSERVATOR OF

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2024

Bapugouda S/O Kashinatagowda Patil vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Apr-25-2024

NO.2 TO 4 IN SO FAR LEVYING OF FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX AS PER SECTION 98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT 1963 REFUND BY R1,-6- R2 TO R4 III) SEEKING WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE … A. IN WP.NO.102682/2021 WOOD CRAFT, H.NO.385, BHARAT NAGAR, SHAHAPUR, BELAGAVI REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR ASIF MUSTAK PEERJAD, AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. VISHNU GALLI, VADAGAON, BELAGAVI-590005. (BY SRI. VITHAL S.TELI, ADVOCATE)1. THE CHIEF PRINCIPAL CONSERVATOR OF

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial