Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 32 · Page 1 of about 783 results (0.122 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 17 2007

K. Ekambaram Reddy S/O K. Doraswamy Reddy Vs. Deputy Conservator of Fo ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-17-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 2(5), 2(7), 62, 62(1), 62(3), 63, 71A, 71G, 85 and 86; Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976 - Sections 8 and 22; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 9 and 51; Trees Act; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2 and 3; Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969

Reported in : ILR2007KAR3197; 2007(5)KarLJ112; 2007(4)AIRKarR81

FOC No. 32/2006-07 against certain persons for the offences punishable under Sections 85 and 86 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (for short 'Forest Act') and Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969 (for short 'Forest Rules') and Section 8 r/w Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2007

Gopal Singh Vs. State Cadre Forest Officers' Association and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-15-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Indian Forest Act - Sections 2, 2(2), 32 and 51A; Andaman Forest Department (Class I and Class II Gazetted "Posts) Recruitment Rules, 1963; Indian Forest Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1966 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 5(2), 8, 8(1) and 9; Andaman and Nicobar Forest Service Rules, 1991 - Rules 5, 10, 14 and 17; Indian Forest Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1966; Andaman and Nicobar Forest Department Code, 1975; Constitution of India - Aricle 309; Andaman Forest Department (Class I and Class II Gazetted "Posts) (Amendment) Recruitment Rules, 1973

Reported in : JT2007(7)SC167; 2007(7)SCALE202; (2007)9SCC369; 2007AIRSCW3372; AIR2007SC1878

Andaman & Nicobar Islands governed by Andaman Forest Department (Class I & Class II Gazetted 'Posts) Recruitment Rules, 1963 (hereafter referred to as 'the 1963 Rules') which were amended on 3.8.1973. Both these Rules provide for the … was tried to be raised that the definition of 'Forest Officer' given in Section 2(2) of the Indian Forest Act read with Section 32(a) thereof suggests that the functions of the Forest Officers include the cutting, sawing, conversion

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2001

Harish Chandra Singh and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ba ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-21-2001

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 9A(2); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 4, 6 and 20; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Article 372

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC562

Land Reforms Act in the case of Mahendra Lal Jaini v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. AIR 1963 SC 1019. The Apex Court in the aforesaid judgment has held that Chapter II of the Indian Forest … Nos. 2, 45 and 41 are reserved forest. Notification under Sections 4, 6 and 20 under the Indian Forest Act, 1927, (hereinafter to be referred as the '1927 Act'), has been issued with regard to land recorded as … for determination regarding exclusion of jurisdiction. It was laid down in paragraph 32 (1) at page 89 as under : 'Where the statute gives a … passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Bareilly Camp at Shahjahanpur under Section 48 of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act and the order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 01 2002

B. Bhaskar, Owner of Lorry Vs. Authorised Officer-cum-sub-divisional F ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-01-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Forest Act; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Excise Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 452(2) and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 141, 142 and 226

Reported in : 2002(3)ALT200; 2002CriLJ1937

forest produce, which were being illegally transported without permission and in violation of the provisions of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, were seized by the forest officials. In that context, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed: : 2000CriLJ3971 'Learned counsel … the parameters of Article 226 of the Constitution of India vis-a-vis Article 32 of the Constitution of India.10. In our Constitution, the founding-fathers had full … learned counsel for the petitioner that the Supreme Court in K. Krishnan's case was considering an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and it is not applicable to a Writ Petition filed under Article

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1991

Bhavani Tea and Produce Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-20-1991

Subject : Property

Acts : Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Sections 2(7), 2(15), 2(34), 2(38), 2(44), 2(47), 81 and 82; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 3; Madras Preservation of Private Forest Act, 1949 - Sections 1(2) and 2; Madras Preservation of Private Forest (Second Amendment) Act, 1954;

Reported in : JT1991(1)SC503; 1991(1)KLT666(SC); 1991(1)SCALE319; (1991)2SCC463; [1991]1SCR550

the case to show that the company's plantations area was a forest under the M.P.P.F. Act.19. The Kerala Forest Act, 1961 (Act 4 of 1962) was an Act to unify and amend the law relating to the protection … statement of objects and reasons also said that the private forests as defined in the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (1 of 1964) were exempt from the ceiling thereunder and that with high density of population there was … the assent of the President on 23.8.1971, and as provided in its Section 1(3) it was deemed to have come into force on the 10th … their title deeds, the company claimed to have purchased an extent of 3273.72 acres of land, but it and only 3,151.20 acres in occupation. Bulk

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 1996

R. Pampapathi Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-02-1996

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines And Minerals (Regulation And Development) Act, 1956; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 98A

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1510

Geology Department, have called upon the Petitioners to pay Forest Development Tax under Section 98A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Forest Act' or 'State Act') from 1.4.1992 at the rate of Eight per … royalty so as to in fact amend find Schedule of the Central Act. As seen earlier in Paragraph 32 of the report in India Cement case, it has been clearly mentioned that in view of the express

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2012

M/S. Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. and Others Vs. Haryana S ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-03-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

houses after the publication of Notification (Annexure P5), whether the authorities under the Acts of 1963 and 1975, Forest Act or the Additional Director (Environment) have actually granted the clarifications under some authority or otherwise,  what would be … by any law for the time being in force. The offence/Acts done also extend to illegal omissions (under section 32 IPC). The act of omission and offence have been defined under Sections 33 and 40 of IPC. Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 1999

B.L. Diwakar Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-15-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 155(2), 190, 245, 468 and 482; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 8, 22, 24 and 73; Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976 - Sections 8; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2 and 3-A; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2001CriLJ305; ILR1999KAR4693; 2000(2)KarLJ283

that there is nothing wrong for taking cognizance under Sections 24(g) and (h) and 73(d) of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, Section 8 read with Section 22 of the Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976 and Section 2 read with … exercised'.8. The learned State Public Prosecutor however, strenuously contended that since there is encroachment to the extent of 32 acres and odd guntas, the matter should not be lightly treated.9. The best document at this stage that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 2025

M/S Mspl Limited., vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Dec-10-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

r/w. 4(1), 4(1)(A) and 23 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, section 24 of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and sec.13(2) r/w. 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.” (Emphasis added)It was alleged that the petitioners’ Company … windmills for four decades. The Apex Court directed the CBI to conduct a preliminary investigation in respect of 32.27 lakh tonnes of iron ore exported from 01-01-2009 to 31-05-2010 from Belekeri Port by various companies. 2.2. Pursuant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 2025

Narendrakumar Baldota vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Dec-10-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

r/w. 4(1), 4(1)(A) and 23 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, section 24 of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and sec.13(2) r/w. 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.” (Emphasis added)It was alleged that the petitioners’ Company … windmills for four decades. The Apex Court directed the CBI to conduct a preliminary investigation in respect of 32.27 lakh tonnes of iron ore exported from 01-01-2009 to 31-05-2010 from Belekeri Port by various companies. 2.2. Pursuant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial