Advanced Search Results

Chandrappa Son of Subbe GowdA. Vs. the State of KarnatakA.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), (Cr.P.C) 1973 - Section 438; Karnataka Forest Act 1963 - Sections 24, 24E, 62, 104A; Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 - Sections 27, 51

to be registered in FOC No.45/11-12 for the offences punishable under Sections 24, 24E, 62, 104A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Rules 144, 165, 127A r/w Sections 27 and 51 of Wild Life Protection Act. 1972 and investigation … 1. In this petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C, the petitioner who has been arrayed as accused No.1 in FOC No.45/11-12 of Range Forest Officer

State of M.P. and Others Vs. Balveer Singh and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 2(1), 57, 57(1), 57(2), 57(3), 111, 158(3), 165(6), 166, 168, 168(2), 170(1), 170-A(2), 170-B, 181, 182, 185, 189, 190, 191, 197, 202, 250, 250(1), 250-A, 250-B and 257; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 1, Rule 3-B; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 27 and 29 - Schedule - Articles 64 and 65; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 9; Madhya Bharat Jamindari Abolition Act - Sections 3, 4 and 8; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 73; Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950 - Sections 3 and 4; Specific Relief Act - Sections 9; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Article 141; Madhya Pradesh Land R

Reported in : AIR2001MP268; 2001(3)MPHT255; 2001(2)MPLJ644

What is the limitation for establishing such rights of bhumiswami, occupancy tenant, Government lessee and whether the Limitation Act, 1963, has no application if such rights are sought to be established against the Government and limitation under Section … the absence of any provision in the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959, which may suggest exclusion of Section 27 of the Indian Limitation Act inrespect of the rights envisaged under the Code, it is obvious that as … all such lands, including standing and flowing water, mines, quarries, minerals and forests reserved or not, and all rights in the sub-soil of any land

Thakreppa S/O. Yankappa Lamani vs the Assistant Commissioner

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

record of rights. As the matter stood thus, a notice was issued under Section 64 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 contending that the land is a forest land and directed the petitioner to vacate the land. The notice … Act. However, the application was not accompanied by a declaration of facts. The Assistant Commissioner vide order dated 27.08.2012 set aside the Saguvali Chit dated 22.06.1993. The Assistant Conservator of Forest issued a notice on 28.08.2012 under

Dakesh S/O. Manappa Lamani vs the Assistant Commissioner

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

record of rights.-3- As the matter stood thus, a notice was issued under Section 64 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 contending that the land is a forest land and directed the petitioner to vacate the land. The notice … Act. However, the application was not accompanied by a declaration of facts. The Assistant Commissioner vide order dated 27.08.2012 set aside the Saguvali Chit dated 22.06.1993. The Assistant Conservator of Forest issued a notice on 28.08.2012 under

Kamat Holiday Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 27; Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 - Sections 35; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114 and 115; Goa, Daman and Diu Land Revenue Code, 1968 - Sections 26; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 239 and 299; Goa, Daman and Diu Land Revenue (Disposal of Government Lands) Rules, 1971 - Rules 33 and 35

Reported in : 1989(2)BomCR261; (1989)91BOMLR587

(Conservation) Act practically becomes meaningless. This can be reaffirmed by reading section 2(i) of the said Act with section 27 of the Indian Forest Act and applying these definitions in the General Clauses Act and transplanting those in … challenged the contention raised on behalf of the Department about the applicability of the provisions of the Indian Forest Act as also of the Forest (Conservation)Act, 1980 and contended that the said provisions have no application in view … on behalf of the President of India. This area is the Union Territory. The Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 (Act 20 of 1963) would have some relevance under which the 'Administrator' is defined as the administrator of

M/S. Damle Brothers Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 18; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 27(1)(0), 28, 54 and 70; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 28(1)

Reported in : AIR1992Kant140; 1991(2)KarLJ86

a Notification issued in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of S. 28 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 with the approval of both the houses of State Legislature directing that the lands specified in the schedule … Rule 35 of M.C. Rules 1960 may kindly be examined, besides conditional application impact as envisaged vide Rule 27(1)(0). Rule 70 of M.C. Rules 1960 and S. 18 of M.M.R.D. Act, 1957 be examined and further orders

Smt Jeanne Pinto Vs. Deputy Conservator Of Forests

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the authorities under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. Therefore, it is necessary to refer to the provisions of Section 27 of the Limitation Act, which reads as under:25. “27. Extinguishment of right to property.-At the determination of the … never as forest land, as can be seen from the statement showing Section 4 declared under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 areas included in forest reserve as per Deputy Commissioner Notification dated 05.06.2002, wherein the plaintiff’s survey numbers are

Shanta Lakshmi W/O Y N Jayaram vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 24(a), 24(f), 24(g), 24(gg), 24(h), 73(d), 80, 82, 82-B AND 109 OF KARNATAKA FOREST ACT-1963 AND RULE 144 AND 165 OF K.F. ACT AND SECTION 4(1), 4(1A), 21 OF MMDR ACT, ON THE … land, destroyed the trees and are carrying on the mining activities illegally. The learned Magistrate by order date 27.09.2017, took cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 24(a), 24(f), 24(g), 24(gg), 24(h), 73(d), 80, 82, 82-B and

Shanta Lakshami S/O V N Jairam vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

land, destroyed the trees and are carrying on the mining activities illegally. The learned Magistrate by order date 27.09.2017, took cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 24(a), 24(d), Forest Act,1963 and Rule 144 and 165 of … HOSAPETE RANGE) THEREBY TAKING COGNIZANCE DATED Bench Date: 2025.03.01 12:14:28 +0530 05.07.2017 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 24(a), 24(d),FOREST ACT-1963 AND RULE 144 AND 165 OF K.F. ACT AND SECTION 4(1), 4(1A), 21 OF MMDR ACT, ON THE

Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 3 to 27, 28 and 29 to 34; Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953 - Sections 27; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 1 and 7(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 4 and 7(1); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Himachal Pradesh Private Forest Act, 1954 - Sections 4, 5, 6 and 11; Land Holdings Act, 1972; Evidence Act - Sections 92

Reported in : AIR1990SC1833; JT1990(3)SC215; 1990(2)SCALE95; (1990)4SCC320; [1990]3SCR469

On 25th February, 1952 the Government of Himachal Pradesh issued a Notification under Section 29 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 declaring that the provisions of Chapter IV of the said enactment shall apply to all forest lands … held that the suit was neither barred by limitation nor on account of Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963. The other technical objections to the maintainability of the suit were spurned and the learned Trial Judge decreed … 108,218,222, 309,341,409, 606, 4 and 33 situate in Chak Addu without prejudice to the application, if any, of Section 27 of the Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953. The contesting defendants Nos.