Advanced Search Results

Smt.Geetha Y vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

2ND NOTICE DATED 18.11.2025 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-G1, ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 64-A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT 1963 AND THE FINAL NOTICE DATED 27.11.2025 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-G2, ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 64-A OF

State of Karnataka Vs. Robert D'Silva

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976 - Sections 8, 8(1) and 26; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964

Reported in : ILR1995KAR2549; 1995(6)KarLJ120

Section 26 of the Act takes care of the subsequent situation by making the provisions of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Rules made thereunder applicable mutatis mutandis to the transit of the felled trees under the Act.

T John vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Jamma Malai lands fall within the ambit of “statutory forest” under the scheme of the - 13 -Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. The finding appears to have been premised on the historical character of such lands, their alleged forest attributes, … directed to grant permission for felling trees without insisting upon seigniorage - 26 - charges, subject to statutory conditions. 22.10.6. The Government chose not to … them to file objections and challenge any adverse action taken pursuant to the report.13. The Deputy Commissioner invoked Section 136 ofthe Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, and directed deletion of the name of Petitioner No.1 from revenue

Nagesh Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(38); Cattle-trespass Act, 1871 - Sections 20; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 26(2), 29, 29(2), 39(2), 177, 313, 325(1) 325(3) and 482; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 2(9), 50, 87, 87(1), 87(2), 104 and 104E; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 411

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2234; ILR1989KAR3058; 1989(3)KarLJ93

30-9-1987 challenging the jurisdiction of the learned Magistrate to try the offences under Chap. X of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (the Act for short), is challenged. 2. The record and proceedings in C.C. No. 3336/86 and the record … the Act punishable under S. 87(2), and the offence punishable under S. 411 of the Penal Code. 16. Section 2(9) of the Act defines the expression 'Magistrate' as Magistrate of the first or second class. 17. The … S. 411 of the Penal Code on the allegations that he on 26-6-1985 at about 8 a.m. at Shet Fine Arts Industries housed, in a

Ram Ratan Gupta Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 299 and 299(1); Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 18 and 64

Reported in : AIR1974MP101; 1974MPLJ95

SC 203 (supra) relating to forest contracts to cases of excise contracts. 26. As a result of the discussion aforesaid, we are clearly of the … entering into a formal contract between the forest contractor and the Government. As such, the provisions of the Forest Act are altogether different and the practice is that a formal deed of contract between the forest contractor and … which does not involve any judicial or quasi-judicial process.17. In Nanhibai Tarachand Jaiswal v. Excise Commr., M. P., 1963 MPLJ 526 = (AIR 1963 Madh Pra 352) a Division Bench of this Court, presided over by Dixit. … Government is contemplated as per Article 299(1) of the Constitution of India.6. Section 17 of the M. P. Excise Act, 1915, lays down that no

Sri Hanumantharaju vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

7 decades, the respondent/State has sought to issue a notification dated 12.10.2023 under Section 5 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (for short Act, 1963) as per Annexure-B, calling upon the petitioners and various other persons who are in … AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,33. SRI MUTTAIAH S/O VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,34. SRI DAYANAND S/O MUTTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,35. SMT PUTTATAYAMMA - 10 - W/O MALLAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,36. SMT BHAVYA M W/O SURESH K

Nk Rajendra Mohan Vs. Thirvamadi Rubber Co. Ltd and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

etc, the pleaded case being that the suit land had belonged to their Tarwad and was a private forest. On 21.6.1918, an area of 963.75 acres was leased out to one Mr. Campbell Hunt for a period … under the lease deed or the provisions of the Kerala Land Reforms Act 1964 (hereinafter referred to as Act 1963), brought into force on and from 01.04.1964 or any other tenancy laws prior thereto. The plaintiffs averred, that … thus stood excluded from the applicability of Act 1963 in terms of Section 3 (1) (vii) thereof, as it was granted to Mr. Campbell Hunt … written statement had pleaded that the lease created by the deed dated 26.6.1918 was an agricultural tenancy entitling the lessee to fixity of tenure under

M.M. Thomas Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 215; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 3(2), 8C(2), and 8C; Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Sections 82; Limitation Act, 1963; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Amendment Act, 1986

Reported in : AIR2000SC540; JT2000(1)SC26; 2000(1)KLT799(SC); (2000)IIMLJ46(SC); 2000(1)SCALE14; (2000)1SCC666; [2000]1SCR33

under his personal cultivation as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (1 of 1964) or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto. (3) Nothing contained in sub-section … that he was entitled to exemption under Section 3(2) of the Act 26 of 1971 did clearly amount to an error apparent on the face … appeal filed by special leave. First is whether the power to review a decision rendered under Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 (for short 'the Act') could have been exercised in the absence of any

Punjab Urban Development Authority and ors. Vs. Dashmesh Educational S ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 77, 166 and 177; Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952 - Sections 6(6); Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 - Sections 4, 5 and 11; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 35; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 1, Rule 10; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 3(26); Transfer of Property Act, 1881 - Sections 2(6); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20; Forest Law

Reported in : (2005)139PLR238

purview of Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1990 (hereinafter referred to as P.L.P.A.) and attracts provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1900 (hereinafter referred to as the Forest Laws), therefore, no change of land use was permissible as provided … questions formulated are not substantial questions of law:-'(I) Whether in view of Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, in the absence of non-declaration of title to the land in question the suit was maintainable?(II) Whether in … by the learned District Judge, Ropar vide his judgment and decree dated 26.7.2002. Needless to say that these Appeals have originated out of Civil Suit

Shri.Javed Akthar M Shaik vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

NO.2 TO 4 IN SO FAR LEVYING OF FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX AS PER SECTION 98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT 1963 REFUND BY R1,-6- R2 TO R4 III) SEEKING WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE … ANNEXURE-A1 1070104/17-06-2020/29 DATED 24.06.2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-A2 1070104/17-06-2020/28 DATED 24.06.2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-A3 1070501/29-06-2020/124 DATED 09.07.2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-A4, 1020102/14-08-2020/52 DATED 26.08.2020, VIDE ANENXURE-A5 1070104/16-10-2020/16 DATED 24.10.2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-A6 1070104/16-10-2020/15 DATED 24.10.2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-A7 1010102/11-02-2021/31 DATED 11.02.2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-A8 ISSUED