Advanced Search Results
ibex Gallagher Praviate Ltd. Represented by Its Manager (Finance), Mr. ...
Karnataka
Jul-03-2009
Contract
Companies Act, 1956; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 109; Karnataka Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 82; Sale of Goods Act - Sections 54(4); Uttar Pradesh Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 - Sections 3; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964
2009(6)KarLJ687
(he concerned personnel of the respondent.6. However, the respondents having chosen to invoke Section 109 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and have sought to raise a dispute in respect of the contract. It is in this background that … life as well as the villagers from the wild life. The petitioner had accordingly submitted its lender on 25.11.2002. The bid of the petitioner was accepted on 27.12.2002. The agreement between the petitioner and the first respondent
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri. B.S Babanna Rai vs State Represented by Deputy Commissioner
Karnataka
Feb-15-2024
points for its consideration:"1. Whether the suit of the Appellants/Plaintiffs is maintainable under section 114(A) of the Karnataka Forest Act 1963 and section 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980?2. Whether the impugned Judgment passed by the trial court suffers … the Government lands for the benefitof public to maintaining the green pasture. Accordingly, the said department had identified 25 acres of the Government land in Peralu Gathu of Mandekolu Village, Sullia Taluk and had planted the trees
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...
Karnataka
Dec-03-2015
Land Acquisition
the provision of Article 246, Entry-54 of Seventh Schedule, List I-Union List of Constitution of India, the Karnataka Forest Act 1963 and the provisions of the Forest [Conservation] Act 1980 [Central Act]. This Writ Petition is filed under Article … or other charges and the collection of royalties on prospecting licence and mining lease and the provisions of Section 25 of the Central Act authorising the recovery of any tax payable under the Central Act as arrear of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...
Karnataka
Dec-03-2015
Education
THAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DEMAND AND COLLECT FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX UNDER SECTION98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 ON THE VALUE OF MINERAL SOLD BY THE PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF THE MINING LEASES GRANTED UNDER THE … or other charges and the collection of royalties on prospecting licence and mining lease and the provisions of Section 25 of the Central Act authorising the recovery of any tax payable under the Central Act as arrear of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRenil @ Rinil C vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Feb-11-2026
to proceed in accordance with law. In the proceedings initiated by him under Section 71A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, he is required to satisfy himselfbased on the material produced before him about the involvement of the vehicle … R/W 401 CR.PC (FILED U/S KARNATAKA 438 R/W 442 BNNS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT ANDORDER DATED 25.10.2025 PASSED BY THE I ADDL.DISTRICT ANDSESSIONS JUDGE, KODAGU-MADIKERI IN CRL.A NO.46/2025 (ANNEXURE-B) IN SO FAR AS IT DISMISSES
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt R H Usha vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jun-05-2026
BY THE R1 AUTHORITY, IN THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN UNDER SECTION 64-A(3) OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 (ACT FOR BREVITY) VIDE APPEAL NO. 361 OF 202223 AS PER ANNEXURE-A; ii) SETTING SIDE THE IMPUGNEDORDER DATED … sought for dismissal of the petition. Additional statement of objections:3.15 The petitioner has heavily relied upon the orderdated 25.05.2012 passed in Writ Petition No.7200/2008 connected with Writ Petition No.29765-766/2009, which is confirmed by the order dated 23.07.2019
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT John vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Feb-17-2026
Jamma Malai lands fall within the ambit of “statutory forest” under the scheme of the - 13 -Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. The finding appears to have been premised on the historical character of such lands, their alleged forest attributes, … purchaser, subject only to what is expressly reserved. It is further - 25 - submitted that reference was made in Pongere Kariappa to a decision … them to file objections and challenge any adverse action taken pursuant to the report.13. The Deputy Commissioner invoked Section 136 ofthe Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, and directed deletion of the name of Petitioner No.1 from revenue
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Dy. Commissioner and Another Vs. Gidda and Others
Karnataka
Apr-20-2012
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227; Karnataka (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955 ; Mysore (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955. ; Mysore Forest Regulation, 1900 - Section 35 (1)(3), 2(2), 33; Karnataka Forest Act 1963 - Section 117, 106, 6; KCRIA Act - Section 3, 9(1), 3(g), 3(b), 7, 8; Karnataka Land Grant Rules
2012ILR(Kar)2275
to forests and forest produce in the State of Karnataka. In that regard, a reference to the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 would indicate that the term ‘Reserved Forest’ is contained therein for the first time and Chapter-II relates to … it is contended that the notification dated 06.03.1928 is not valid inasmuch as the same is issued under Section 35 (iii) of the Regulations. It is further contended that the said Regulation only provides for Regulation of … Constitution of India, with a prayer to quash vide Anx. A1 dated 25.11.1993. Anx. 92 dated 30.09.93. Anx.A3 dated 28.10.93. Anx. A4 dated 14.09.93. Anx.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt Janaki Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION SPECIAL COURT, BENGALURU IN PROCEEDINGS DATED1611.1997 AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS33AND73KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963, RULE25 42, 43 KARNATAKA FOREST RULES, 1969, COLUMN NO.2 THE FOREST CONSERVATION ACT1980AND SECTIONS4AND5OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION … EHT LAND GRABBING SPECIAL COURT IN PROCEEDINGS No.LGC(P) NO.310/ 2017 AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION43]. OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PHOHIBITION ACT2011[ANNEXURE-B]. AND ETC. IN W.P. No.36459/2018: BETWEEN:1. . SRI C. GOVARDHAN REDDY … LAKKAVALLI HOBLI, TARIKERE TALUK CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT-577101 2 . R MANJUNATHA S/O RANGAPPA, 250 AGED ABOUT63YEARS RETIRED EMPLOYEE, WATERMAN, MUDUGODU GRAMA PANCHAYATI R/O IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT QUARTERS,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri V G Siddhartha Hegde Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION SPECIAL COURT, BENGALURU IN PROCEEDINGS DATED1611.1997 AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS33AND73KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963, RULE25 42, 43 KARNATAKA FOREST RULES, 1969, COLUMN NO.2 THE FOREST CONSERVATION ACT1980AND SECTIONS4AND5OF KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION … EHT LAND GRABBING SPECIAL COURT IN PROCEEDINGS No.LGC(P) NO.310/ 2017 AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION43]. OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PHOHIBITION ACT2011[ANNEXURE-B]. AND ETC. IN W.P. No.36459/2018: BETWEEN:1. . SRI C. GOVARDHAN REDDY … LAKKAVALLI HOBLI, TARIKERE TALUK CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT-577101 2 . R MANJUNATHA S/O RANGAPPA, 250 AGED ABOUT63YEARS RETIRED EMPLOYEE, WATERMAN, MUDUGODU GRAMA PANCHAYATI R/O IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT QUARTERS,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »