Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 20 · Page 1 of about 1,441 results (0.088 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 04 2004

S. Murari and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka, by Range Forest Officer

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-04-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 155(2), 156 and 482; Karnataka Police Act, 1963 - Sections 2(16), 19 and 20; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 62A, 62A(1) and 155

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2272; ILR2004KAR1706; 2004(6)KarLJ115

Range Forest Officer to investigate the case against the accused for offences under Section 24 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, Section 35(6) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980.4. Criminal … under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code.3. Criminal petition No. 2853/2002 is for setting aside the order dated 20-7-2002 passed in F.I.R. No. 11/2001-02 by the Range Forest Officer, Kudremukh, wherein the learned Magistrate had permitted the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2026

T John vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-17-2026

Jamma Malai lands fall within the ambit of “statutory forest” under the scheme of the - 13 -Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. The finding appears to have been premised on the historical character of such lands, their alleged forest attributes, … them to file objections and challenge any adverse action taken pursuant to the report.13. The Deputy Commissioner invoked Section 136 ofthe Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, and directed deletion of the name of Petitioner No.1 from revenue … HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 4500 OF

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 2009

Sri Anil Colaco S/O. J.S. Colaco, Coffee Planter Vs. the Authorized Of ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-26-2009

Subject : Environment

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 20, 29, 44, 44(2), 44(2A), 45, 58A, 62(1), 62(2), 62(3), 71A to 71G and 104A; Karnataka Forest (Amendment) Act, 1976; Andhra Pradesh Forest Act - Sections 44 and 45; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2009(5)KarLJ249

a security. It is further averred that the 2nd respondent initiated proceedings under Section 71(A) of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act'). The petitioner filed objections to the said proceedings and the 2nd respondent, without … whether the accused is facing a trial before a Magistrate for the commission of a forest offence under Section 20 or 29 of the Act.13. The provisions of Sections 71A and 71B referred to above are identical to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 17 2007

K. Ekambaram Reddy S/O K. Doraswamy Reddy Vs. Deputy Conservator of Fo ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-17-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 2(5), 2(7), 62, 62(1), 62(3), 63, 71A, 71G, 85 and 86; Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act, 1976 - Sections 8 and 22; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 9 and 51; Trees Act; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2 and 3; Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969

Reported in : ILR2007KAR3197; 2007(5)KarLJ112; 2007(4)AIRKarR81

FOC No. 32/2006-07 against certain persons for the offences punishable under Sections 85 and 86 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (for short 'Forest Act') and Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969 (for short 'Forest Rules') and Section 8 r/w Section … petitioner for transportation of mud and sand from the surroundings of I.T.C. Company to Palace ground, Bangalore. On 20.07.2006 at about 12.10 P.M. while the vehicle of the petitioner was transporting the mud and sand, certain officials

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 1999

C. Abdul Hameed Vs. State by Belthangady Police

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-07-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 86, 87 and 104-D; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 138, 437, 438 and 439; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities ) Act, 1989 - Sections 18 and 20(7)

Reported in : 1999(2)ALT(Cri)89; 1999CriLJ3654; 1999(2)KarLJ679

of 1998 of that Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 86 and 87 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. The petitioner having failed in his attempt to get an order of bail in the hands of the … ORDER1. This petition is filed under Section 438 of the Cr. P.C., for grant of anticipatory bail in the event of the arrest of the … the same, he noticed sandalwood billets in the said hag, weighing about 20.500 Kgs. valued at Rs. 8,200/-, and seized the same under a mahazar

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 2004

Punjab Urban Development Authority and ors. Vs. Dashmesh Educational S ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-12-2004

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 77, 166 and 177; Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952 - Sections 6(6); Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 - Sections 4, 5 and 11; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 35; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 1, Rule 10; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 3(26); Transfer of Property Act, 1881 - Sections 2(6); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20; Forest Law

Reported in : (2005)139PLR238

purview of Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1990 (hereinafter referred to as P.L.P.A.) and attracts provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1900 (hereinafter referred to as the Forest Laws), therefore, no change of land use was permissible as provided … questions formulated are not substantial questions of law:-'(I) Whether in view of Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, in the absence of non-declaration of title to the land in question the suit was maintainable?(II) Whether in … is declaration qua the 'State of Punjab' and as such the case squarely falls within the provisions of Section 20 C.P.C., it was denied that any material facts were suppressed from the Court though it was admitted that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2024

Sri Shivanna S M vs the Special Deputy Commissioner-1

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-01-2024

have no legal right in the land in question. He further submitted that, Section 4 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 provides for notifying the land to fortify that land has been vested in the Department of Forest and … -1- and IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.51734 OF 2016 (KLR-RR/SUR) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.49784 OF

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2024

Sri a Narayanappa vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-01-2024

have no legal right in the land in question. He further submitted that, Section 4 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 provides for notifying the land to fortify that land has been vested in the Department of Forest and … -1- and IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.51734 OF 2016 (KLR-RR/SUR) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.49784 OF

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2024

The State of Karnataka vs Shri Byrappa

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-01-2024

have no legal right in the land in question. He further submitted that, Section 4 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 provides for notifying the land to fortify that land has been vested in the Department of Forest and … -1- and IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.51734 OF 2016 (KLR-RR/SUR) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.49784 OF

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 1987

Yashwant Stone Works Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-26-1987

Subject : Civil

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15; Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963; Forest Conservation Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1988All121

to be allowed by publication of a notification declaring forest as reserved forest. Admittedly no such declaration under Section 20 of the Forest Act was made. 12. The question, however, is whether in the absence of declaration of … of forest land for non-forest purposes, 11. In the instant case a notification under Section 4 of the Forest Act, 1927, was made by the State Government deciding to constitute the land in question as reserved forest. Section … for the purposes aforesaid under the U. P. Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963, The petitioner's grievance is that the application has been unduly and unjustifiably

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial