Advanced Search Results

Jugalkishore Asati Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : ArbitrationCommercial

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 8(1), 37 and 37(5); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 83; Madhya Pradesh Forest Contract Rules - Rule 8

Reported in : AIR1979MP89; 1979MPLJ161

limitation for the suit under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act read with Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the defendant having participated and insisted on the arbitration clause before the Board, it is estopped from raising … time being in force. In the present case, admittedly, there is no statutory arbitration provided under the Indian Forest Act. A Full Bench of this Court in Rama Ratan Gupta v. State of M.P., AIR 1974 Madh Pra

The State of Karnataka vs Shri Byrappa

Court : Karnataka

have no legal right in the land in question. He further submitted that, Section 4 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 provides for notifying the land to fortify that land has been vested in the Department of Forest and … the petitioners have admitted that the land in question is a jodi Inam land and upon referring to Section 14 of the Inams Abolition Act, he submitted that, it is the ‘land’ to be considered and not the

Sri Shivanna S M vs the Special Deputy Commissioner-1

Court : Karnataka

have no legal right in the land in question. He further submitted that, Section 4 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 provides for notifying the land to fortify that land has been vested in the Department of Forest and … the petitioners have admitted that the land in question is a jodi Inam land and upon referring to Section 14 of the Inams Abolition Act, he submitted that, it is the ‘land’ to be considered and not the

Sri a Narayanappa vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

have no legal right in the land in question. He further submitted that, Section 4 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 provides for notifying the land to fortify that land has been vested in the Department of Forest and … the petitioners have admitted that the land in question is a jodi Inam land and upon referring to Section 14 of the Inams Abolition Act, he submitted that, it is the ‘land’ to be considered and not the

T John vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Jamma Malai lands fall within the ambit of “statutory forest” under the scheme of the - 13 -Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. The finding appears to have been premised on the historical character of such lands, their alleged forest attributes, … provision, Respondent No.3 treated the Petitioners not as tenure holders recognised - 14 -under revenue law, but as lessees or grantees holding under forest law, … them to file objections and challenge any adverse action taken pursuant to the report.13. The Deputy Commissioner invoked Section 136 ofthe Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, and directed deletion of the name of Petitioner No.1 from revenue

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. Ayilammal Syamala Thamburatti and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 to 24 and 29(2); Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 3(2), 8 and 8A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 2(9) and 2(14); Kerala Private Forests (Tribunal) Rules, 1972 - Rule 11

Reported in : AIR1980Ker82

George Vadakkel, J.1. This appeal is preferred under Section 8A of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971, (hereinafter, the Act) from the decision of the Forest Tribunal, palghat, under Section … of limitation, and the answer thereto depends on the applicability or otherwise of Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to this appeal.2. It is not disputed that the Act is a 'special or local law' falling within

The Dy. Commissioner and Another Vs. Gidda and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227; Karnataka (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955 ; Mysore (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955. ; Mysore Forest Regulation, 1900 - Section 35 (1)(3), 2(2), 33; Karnataka Forest Act 1963 - Section 117, 106, 6; KCRIA Act - Section 3, 9(1), 3(g), 3(b), 7, 8; Karnataka Land Grant Rules

Reported in : 2012ILR(Kar)2275

to forests and forest produce in the State of Karnataka. In that regard, a reference to the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 would indicate that the term ‘Reserved Forest’ is contained therein for the first time and Chapter-II relates to … under:“3. Consequence of the vesting of an Inam in the State.-(1) When the notification under Sub-section (4) of Section 14 in respect of any Inam has been published in the Mysore Gazette, then, notwithstanding anything contained in any

Mineral Sales Private Limited (Mspl), Hospet Vs. State of Karnataka an ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : CommercialCompany

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 24 and 82; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 2009(6)KarLJ386:2009(3)KCCR1838:2009(4)AIRKarR462(D.B)

firm. By this act, the M/s. Mineral Sales Private Limited, Hospet have violated Section 24 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and agreement Condition Nos. 13 and 18; and3. The user agency out of their mining leased forest area … the petitioner herein in the year 1962 and got renewed for 20 years each time with effect from 14-11-1962, 14-11-1982 and 14-11-2002. The petitioner, admittedly obtained clearance from the concerned forest authorities as contemplated under Section 2

Mspl Limited Rep. by Its Vice President (Cc and L), Sri K.R.M. Reddy V ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 24 and 82; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

dated 29.12.2008 the fourth respondent, invoking Condition No. 23 of the Agreement and Section 82 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 directed the petitioner to stop, mining activities temporarily till the petitioner corrects the violated conditions and thus suspended … the petitioner herein in the year 1962 and got renewed for 20 years each time with effect from 14.11.1962, 14.11.1982 and 14.11.2002. The petitioner, admittedly obtained clearance from the concerned forest authorities as contemplated under Section 2

Pushpalata Sohanlal Sharma Vs. Smt. Brij Madanlal Sharma and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

2003 taken in prosecuting the lis by Pushpa in the Co-operative Court is required to be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The suit having been filed in 2003 is within 9 years of the … possession under Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 (later section 6 of the present Specific Relief Act, 1963) within 6 months of dispossession notwithstanding any other title that may be set up in such a suit. … also consequent lawful possession. 131. In the case of Chief Conservator of Forests, Govt. of AP Vs. Collector and Ors., (2003) 3 Supreme Court Cases