Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 108 · Page 1 of about 136 results (0.050 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 02 1996

R. Pampapathi Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-02-1996

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines And Minerals (Regulation And Development) Act, 1956; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 98A

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1510

Geology Department, have called upon the Petitioners to pay Forest Development Tax under Section 98A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Forest Act' or 'State Act') from 1.4.1992 at the rate of Eight per … before us, it can only be enjoyed and occupied by the lessee by working it, as indicated in Section 108, Transfer of Property Act, which regulates the rights and liabilities of lessors and lessees of immovable property.....' The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2023

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi /acb

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … that has been going on in the forest areas in Bellary district. 108 They have accepted illegal gratification; allowed illegal mining and transportation. They aided … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2023

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … that has been going on in the forest areas in Bellary district. 108 They have accepted illegal gratification; allowed illegal mining and transportation. They aided … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 04 2023

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … that has been going on in the forest areas in Bellary district. 108 They have accepted illegal gratification; allowed illegal mining and transportation. They aided … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2023

Sri.s. Muthaiah Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … that has been going on in the forest areas in Bellary district. 108 They have accepted illegal gratification; allowed illegal mining and transportation. They aided … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2001

Harish Chandra Singh and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ba ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-21-2001

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 9A(2); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 4, 6 and 20; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Article 372

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC562

Land Reforms Act in the case of Mahendra Lal Jaini v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. AIR 1963 SC 1019. The Apex Court in the aforesaid judgment has held that Chapter II of the Indian Forest … Nos. 2, 45 and 41 are reserved forest. Notification under Sections 4, 6 and 20 under the Indian Forest Act, 1927, (hereinafter to be referred as the '1927 Act'), has been issued with regard to land recorded as … orders of the Deputy Director of Consolidation passed in Revision Nos. 99, 108 and 109 which were also decided by the same Judgment dated 25.6.2001 … passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Bareilly Camp at Shahjahanpur under Section 48 of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act and the order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1994

Smt. G. Kalamani Vs. the Chief Conservator of Forests in Karnataka and ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-21-1994

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Forests Act, 1964 - Sections 2(7); Karnataka Forests Rules, 1969 - Rule 144; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 2(7)

Reported in : AIR1995Kant211; ILR1994KAR951; 1994(2)KarLJ418

short Notes. Item No. 108 page 92)explaining the scope of Section 2(7) of the Acthas held as follows:Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. Section 2(7) -- Soapnut, if Forest Produce; Assuming that soapnut is a fruit or other part or produce of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2010

Union of India (Uoi) Through the Commissioner of Customs (P) Vs. Mr. Z ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-30-2010

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108, 111, 113, 114, 114(1), 118, 129B, 130, 130(1), 130(3) and 135(1); ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Section 13(2); ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35(G) and 35H; ;Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 120B; ;Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - Rules 23 and 41; ;CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 - Rule 14; ;Constitution of India - Articles 26, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR2266,2010(176)LC257(Bombay)

provided by the statute.21. The Apex Court in the matter of Uttaranchal Forest Development Corporation and Anr. v. Jabar Singh and Ors. reported in : … and no further period for filing appeal or making reference to High Court mentioned Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 excluded in the absence of clause condoning delay by showing sufficient cause after prescribed period Time limit prescribed … urged that the statement of the Respondent No. 1 was recorded before the Superintendent of Customs, Mumbai under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 wherein he interalia admitted recovery of 40,000 US dollars from his handbag and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2026

T John vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-17-2026

Jamma Malai lands fall within the ambit of “statutory forest” under the scheme of the - 13 -Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. The finding appears to have been premised on the historical character of such lands, their alleged forest attributes, … Respondents rely heavily on thejudgment in W.A. No. 375 of 2011 and- 108 -contend that the earlier order in W.P. No. 4013 of 2007 was … them to file objections and challenge any adverse action taken pursuant to the report.13. The Deputy Commissioner invoked Section 136 ofthe Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, and directed deletion of the name of Petitioner No.1 from revenue

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2024

Mr. Mohan Kumar H.G vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-23-2024

AND DISCHARGE THE PETITIONER FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 62, 80 AND 104-A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 READ WITH SECTIONS 127-A, 144 AND 165 OF KFR 1969. -2- THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS … contended by learned counsel for petitioner that the distance between Sy.Nos.97 and 108 of Hanbal Village is more than 4½ to 5 Kms. Therefore, the … Location: BENGALURU-560 001 HIGH …RESPONDENT COURT OF (BY SMT.RASHMI PATEL, HCGP)KARNATAKA THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 CR.PC. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 11.09.2023 IN CC.NO.787/2022 PASSED BY

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial