Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1963 section 103 · Page 1 of about 118 results (0.051 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 04 2023

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi /acb

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … collected etc., during the course of investigation by the investigating Agency in 103 RC-3(A)/2012/CBI/ACB/Bangalore, which were placed before the Chief Minister for his consideration in … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2023

Sri.s. Muthaiah Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … collected etc., during the course of investigation by the investigating Agency in 103 RC-3(A)/2012/CBI/ACB/Bangalore, which were placed before the Chief Minister for his consideration in … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2023

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … collected etc., during the course of investigation by the investigating Agency in 103 RC-3(A)/2012/CBI/ACB/Bangalore, which were placed before the Chief Minister for his consideration in … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 04 2023

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2023

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … collected etc., during the course of investigation by the investigating Agency in 103 RC-3(A)/2012/CBI/ACB/Bangalore, which were placed before the Chief Minister for his consideration in … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 2003

State of Kerala and ors. Vs. K. Sarojini Amma and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-14-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Sections 2(47), 81, 81(1), 82, 82(4), 83, 84, 85, 87 and 103; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971; Constitution of India - Article 227; Madras Preservation of Private Forests Act, 1949 - Sections 1(2), 2 and 3(1); State Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 5(2) and 119; Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1964; Kerala Adoption of Laws Order, 1956

Reported in : AIR2003SC4475; JT2003(Suppl2)SC366; 2004(1)KLT354(SC); 2003(8)SCALE591; (2003)8SCC526

the High Court made in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction under Section 103 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (for short 'the Act'). The Taluk Land Board directed the respondents to surrender a total extent of about … State Reorganisation Act, 1956 (Central Act 37 of 1956) -(i) any land which the Madras Preservation of Private Forest Act, 1949 (Madras Act XXVII of 1949) applied immediately before the appointed day excluding - (A) land which are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2024

Sree Kapliyangatt Bhagavathi Devaswom Represented by Its Executive Off ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-09-2024

guardian of the deity and apart from the revisional jurisdiction under Section 103 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, the High Court has inherent jurisdiction and the doctrine of parens patriae will also apply in exercising the … establishing right of the 7th respondent therein for declaration of rights under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 in an appropriate forum. In that decision, the dispute between the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2023

Saleesh. V vs State of Kerala Represented by the Secretary, Cultural A ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-05-2023

guardian of the deity and apart from the revisional jurisdiction under Section 103 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, the High Court has inherent jurisdiction and the doctrine of parens patriae will also apply in exercising the … on the banks of the holy stream ‘papanasini’ in the Thirunelli temple premises and to reinstate the natural forest existed there. F. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to the 2nd

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2023

V.Murugan, vs the Travancore Devaswom Board,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-13-2023

guardian of the deity and apart from the revisional jurisdiction under Section 103 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, the High Court is having inherent jurisdiction and the doctrineof parens patriae will also apply in exercising the … Bihar [(1977) 3 SCC 457], Premji Bhai Parmar v. Delhi Development Authority [(1980) 2 SCC 129] and Divisional Forest Officer v. Bishwanath Tea Company Ltd. [(1981) 3 SCC 238] is that, where the contract entered into between

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Education

THAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DEMAND AND COLLECT FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX UNDER SECTION98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 ON THE VALUE OF MINERAL SOLD BY THE PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF THE MINING LEASES GRANTED UNDER THE … & R.2) ***** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION98 OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT1993AND NOTIFICATION DT. 16.8.2008 PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE ON278.2008 VIDE ANNEXURE B DOES … W.P.No.31144/2008 BETWEEN: M/S ASSOCIATED MINING COMPANY, NO.XVIII/35, II LINK ROAD, PARVATHINAGAR, BELLARY-583 103, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SMT. K.M. PARVATHAMMA. (BY SRI: K.N. PHANINDRA, ADVOCATE)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 2019

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Sri Galli Janardhan Reddy

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-18-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

r/w. Section 4(1), 4(1)(A) and Section 23 of MMDR Act, 1957 and also under Section 24 of Karnataka Forest Act.1963. After completion of investigation, CBI filed the charge sheet against accused persons. 5. It is the case … District Incharge Minister, Bellary & Minister for Tourism, Govt. of Karnataka Resident of Ganeshnagar Kurrati, Siraguppa Road Bellary-583 103. Respondent (By Sri Sandesh J.Chouta, Senior Counsel for Sri Chandrashekar R.P. Advocate) This Criminal Revision Petition is filed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial