Advanced Search Results

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. Popular Estates and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : The Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 3, 3(2), 6 and 8; Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Sections 81 and 85(9A); Kerala Land Reforms (Ceiling) Rules, 1970 - Rule 10

Reported in : 2004(9)SCALE263; (2004)12SCC434

mention here that the respondents had filed a draft statement under the provisions of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963. Section 81 of this Act inter alia exempts private forests and plantations. Rule 10 of the Kerala Land Reforms … would be a piece of evidence, but it cannot be treated as binding on the authorities under the Forest Act. 12. Learned counsel for the respondents produced before us copies of registered deeds and contended that these formed

Jai Lal Vs. the Punjab State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 2 and 49; Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 72 and 91; Patiala Forest Rule - Rule 10; Patiala Forests Act - Sections 76

Reported in : AIR1967Delhi118

Articles 2 and 49 of Schedule to Limitation Act, 1908, Articles 72 and 91 of Schedule to Limitation Act, 1963, Section 76 of Patiala Forests Act and Rule 10 of Patiala Forest Rule - Article 2 affords prtoection to

Government of Kerala vs Jacob Thomas Arikupuram

Court : Kerala

by notification in the Kerala Government Gazette, but does not apply to reserved forests constituted under the Madras Forest Act, 1882 (Madras Act V of 1882) and lands at the disposal of the Government as defined in that … before the appointed day excluding-(A) lands which are gardens or nilams as defined in the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (1 of 1964);(B) lands which are used principally for thecultivation of tea, coffee, cocoa, rubber, cardamom or cinnamon … dispute is not a private forest, also arises.2. Facts, in nut shell, are thus: Respondents preferred anapplication under Section 10(1) of the EFL Act before the Tribunal constituted under Section 9 of the said Act. Averments therein would

Dirk India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mahagenco

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Arbitration Act - Sections 9 and 11; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 41 and 42; Environmental Protection Act; Environmental Protection Rules

Reported in : 2007(5)BomCR207

could be granted. Specific performance of such contract could not be granted in view of Explanation (ii) to Section 10 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. He further submitted that in any event, the contract for supply of … issued by the Government of India in the Ministry of Environment and Forest inter alia setting out guide-lines for the disposal of the fly ash. … negative injunction restraining sale to a third party could be granted under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.8. In order to support his submissions, Mr. Dada referred to and relied upon the following decisions:(i) (Sky Petroleum

T John vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Jamma Malai lands fall within the ambit of “statutory forest” under the scheme of the - 13 -Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. The finding appears to have been premised on the historical character of such lands, their alleged forest attributes, … them to file objections and challenge any adverse action taken pursuant to the report.13. The Deputy Commissioner invoked Section 136 ofthe Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, and directed deletion of the name of Petitioner No.1 from revenue … Sy.No.154/34 - 120.00 acres • Sy.No.154/35 - 97.00 acres • Sy.No.154/36 - 104.42 acres • Sy.No.170 - 16.54 acres • Sy.No.173 - 5.00 acres •

Mspl Limited, Rep by Its Executive Director. Vs. the State of Karnatak ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Mines And Minerals

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 226, 227; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 59, 30, 7A(1), 60, 24A95); Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 30, 11(2), 17A

Reported in : 2009(1)KCCR5(SN)

context of the various statutory enactments such as Forest Act, 1927 [and in the case of Karnataka, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 also] Forest [Conservation] Act, 1980, Environment [Protection] Act, 1986, Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 and the supporting Rules both … of hearing to the applicants and had made recommendations in favour of 10 of the applicants, whose applications he had considered. It is stated that … central government in terms of the communication dated 6-12-2004 [copy at Annexure-K to the writ petition] as per Section 5(1) of the Act and as no more land is available for grant of lease in favour of

Dr H Nagaraj vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

malkies (standing trees).3. Given the circumstances, the 3rd respondent issued a notification under Section 4 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (“the Forest Act”) declaring that it has decided toconstitute the subject lands as a ‘reserved forest’. At this … BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 10775 OF 2020 (GM-FOR) BETWEEN:1. DR. H. NAGARAJ S/O LATE H. DATTATRI, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/AT KUVEMPU ROAD,

ibex Gallagher Praviate Ltd. Represented by Its Manager (Finance), Mr. ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Contract

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 109; Karnataka Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 82; Sale of Goods Act - Sections 54(4); Uttar Pradesh Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 - Sections 3; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964

Reported in : 2009(6)KarLJ687

(he concerned personnel of the respondent.6. However, the respondents having chosen to invoke Section 109 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and have sought to raise a dispute in respect of the contract. It is in this background that … on or before 30.6.2007.5. This was challenged by the petitioner by way of a writ petition in WP 10092/2007. The petition was disposed of by this Court, with a direction lo the respondents lo consider the order

Smt.Geetha Y vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

2ND NOTICE DATED 18.11.2025 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-G1, ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 64-A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT 1963 AND THE FINAL NOTICE DATED 27.11.2025 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-G2, ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 64-A OF … -1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 37320 OF 2025 (GM-FOR)

Kanyakumari District Planters Association, Nagarcoil rep., by its Secr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

State. The statement of objects and reasons stated that the private forest as defined in Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, were exempted from ceiling thereunder and that with high density of population, there was scarcity of lands and … regular and systematic cultivation. Referring to the definition of 'Forest' as defined under Section 2(aa) of the Private Forest Act, it was submitted that a word 'Forest' as understood in common parlance is a large uncultivated tract of … Act, 1882, has been made applicable subject to certain modifications in which penalties and procedures have been stipulated. Section 10 is the rule making power of the State Government for carrying out the purposes of the Act. 22.