Advanced Search Results

Kamal Kishore and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Gwalior State Forest Act Samvat, 1962 - Sections 5 and 6; Madhya Bharat Forest Act Samvat, 2007 - Sections 86; Madhya Bharat Forest Act Samvat, 1950; Madhya Pardesh Extension of Laws Act, 1958 - Sections 6; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 4, 20A, 20A(1), 20A(2), 20A(4), 26, 33, 68 and 82; ;Madhya Pradesh Forest (Amendment) Act, 1965 - Sections 20; Forest Act, 1905; Madhya Pradesh Extension of Laws Act - Sections 6.1; Indian Forest (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Ordinance, 1964; ;Forests (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2006MP167; 2006(2)MPHT45; 2007(1)MPLJ181

forest.7. In order to save the forest lands, the Legislature has amended and inserted Section 20A in Indian Forest Act, 1927 by State Amendment No. 9 of 1965. It is provided by the amendment that entire lands declared as … repealed after Madhya Bharat Forest Act Samvat, 2007 came into force vide Act No. 73 of 1950. Under Section 86 of the said Act, on coming into force the said Act, all Acts or any other similar laws

Harish Chandra Singh and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ba ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 9A(2); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 4, 6 and 20; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Article 372

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC562

Nos. 2, 45 and 41 are reserved forest. Notification under Sections 4, 6 and 20 under the Indian Forest Act, 1927, (hereinafter to be referred as the '1927 Act'), has been issued with regard to land recorded as forest … challenging the same order dated 25.6.2001 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Bareilly Camp at Shahjahanpur under Section 48 of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act and the order dated 15.1.2000 passed by the Settlement … Chandan Singh has filed objection claiming Plot Nos. 2 and 41 area 86.20 acres.8. In Writ Petition No. 41319 of 2001. Didar Singh and Ors.v.

Col. Sawai Bhawani Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct TaxationMiscellaneous

Acts : Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 8, 8(1), 8(2), 8(3), 16, 16(2), 16(12), 58(2), 71, 73, 74, 78, 79, 85, 86, 99, 111, 112 and 333; ;Income Tax Act 1961 - Section 132; ;Antiquities and Treasures Act, 1972; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(2) and 24B; ;Customs Act, 1962; ;Sea Customs Act 1878 - Section 167(8); ;Forest Act, 1927 - Section 59A(2) and 59G; ;Defence of India Rules

under the GCA are not quasi criminal. The above case concerned confiscation proceedings under Section 59G of the Forest Act 1927 as amended by the West Bengal Act 22 of 1988. In the context of those provisions it was … to do so entails a punishment with imprisonment of a period up to two years in terms of Section 86 GCA. Therefore, the failure to make a declaration has penal and punitive consequences. This is the background against

In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands versus

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1480

Matched in: Judge BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI * , AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH 1480 : 2025 INSC 754 In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands [(I.A. No. 12465 of 2019 with I.A. No. 98194 of 2019, I.A. No. 127871 of 2020, I.A. No. 127874 of 2020, I.A. No. 44062 of 2025, I.A. No. 66986 and 74569 of 2025) In (Writ Petition (C) No. 202 of 1995)] In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of Issue pertains to the status of Zudpi Jungle or Zudpi Forest in the six districts of State of Maharashtra; and whether the recommendations made by the CEC in its 2025 Report should be accepted or not. …

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … University. It of approximately 87 Hectares. (cid:143)  The Central Ridge (also called New Delhi) consists of around 864 Hectares of forested area, from south of Sadar Bazaar to Dhaula Kuan, but some bits of the Central

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … University. It of approximately 87 Hectares. (cid:143)  The Central Ridge (also called New Delhi) consists of around 864 Hectares of forested area, from south of Sadar Bazaar to Dhaula Kuan, but some bits of the Central

Patel Kanjibhai Govindbhai Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1995)2GLR1346

presumption that the driver Vinodbhai was an agent of the petitioner authorised to commit an offence under the Forest Act. No doubt the purpose of this confiscatory provision is deterrent, and the power of confiscation or imposing very … regarding confiscation of Truck No. GTS 6727 belonging to the petitioner under Section 61A of the Indian Forests Act, 1927, on the ground that Teak wood valued at about Rs. 50,000/- was being carried in the truck without

Bombay Environmental Action Group and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 15, 19, 21, 38, 39, 46, 47, 48-A, 51-A and 226; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2(25)(23)(7), 3, 4(1), (2), 14, 18, 20, 21, 22, 36-a, 44, 113, 115 and 159; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 1, Rule 1; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964; Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 1 to 87 and 88(1); Maharashtra Pollution Control Board under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1955; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961; Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976; Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936; Nagar Panch

Reported in : 1999(1)BomCR455

It is next submitted that the notification is in violation of the provisions contained in the Indian Forests Act, 1927, Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and Maharashtra Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975 and hence invalid. It is submitted that the … was included for preparation of Regional Plan. By the said Notification, Pune Regional Planning Board was constituted under section 4(1)(2) and section 20(1) of M.R.T.P. Act. The said Board prepared existing land use map of the region

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Aircrafts Act; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act 1888 - Sections 354A; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 4(1), 9 and 10(1); Cantonment Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5; Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 57; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 141, 226, 227, 245, 246, 246(1), 300A and 372(1); Development Control Regulations, 1991;Evidence Act - Sections 114; Forest Act, 1865 - Sections 34A and 38; Forest Act, 1878; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Government of India Act 1935; Greater Bombay Laws and the Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 1, 2, 2A, 3 to 26, 34., 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3), 35(4), 36, 36A, 36B, 36C, 37 and 38; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11A; Limitat

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

the individual petitions. The action proceeds on the basis that once notice under Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, hereinafter referred to as '1927 Act', is issued, any land in respect of which such notice has been

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

reform came up for consideration. It was contended that the provisions of 1960 Act were repugnant to the Forest Act, 1927. Section 4A providing for vesting was introduced in the 1960 Act by amendment in the year 1978. On the … which event it would be operative only to that limited extent. W.P(C) No.26691 of 2010, etc. -:174. :- 86. In the correspondence regarding the presidential assent, which has been submitted by the learned Government Pleader, the noting