Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1927 section 83 · Page 1 of about 77 results (0.036 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 13 1995

M/S. Digamber Pershad Kirti Prasad Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Othe ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-13-1995

Subject : Contract

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 4(3 and 4), 20 and 26; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 83(1); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1996All1

retained by the seller, if full payment is not made. Sub-section (1) of Section 83 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is relevant. Sub-section (I) of Section 83 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 entitles the Forest Officer to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 1972

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. Raghubir Sahai and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-07-1972

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 82 and 83(2); Revenue Recovery Act

Reported in : AIR1972All555

Indian Forest Act he was duly empowered to make such sales.5. Sections 82 and 83 of the Indian Forest Act 1927, read as follows :--'82. All money payable to the Government under this Act, or under any rule made … not have been made directly by the District Forest Officer was not correct because under the provisions of Section 83 of the Indian Forest Act he was duly empowered to make such sales.5. Sections 82 and 83 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 1965

Badri Prasad Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-16-1965

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Forest Contract Rules - Rules 1, 5, 8, 18, 18(2), 18(3), 19(3), 20, 20(2), 32 and 102A; Forest Contract Act - Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4; Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 25(1); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 83 and 83(1); Sale of Goods Act - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1966SC58; [1965]3SCR381

Act, Section 25 (1) of Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1930, Sections 83 and 83 (1) of Indian Forest Act, 1927 and Sale of Goods Act - respondent no. 2 purchased at public auction sale held by Divisional Forest

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 06 1990

Jogendra Lal Saha Vs. the State of Bihar and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-06-1990

Subject : Environment

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 11, 17, 82 and 83; Bihar Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914; Constitution of India - Article 226; Sale of Goods Act, 1930

Reported in : AIR1991SC1148; 1991Supp(2)SCC654

claim was actually for damages and not the balance of the sale price. Therefore, Section 82 of the Forest Act, 1927 which authorises recovery of the amount as a public demand was not attracted and at the most the … 1930. We find that there is reference in the Allahabad decision : AIR1980All100 , to the provision of Section 83 of the Forest Act but though the provision has been quoted full implication of it has not been

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 1979

Mohd. Yaqub Vs. the State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-30-1979

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 82 and 83

Reported in : AIR1980All213

fails and is dismissed with costs. Commercial - recovery under auction sale - Sections 82 and 83 of Forest Act, 1927 - auction sale of timber - contractor made part payment for purchases - Government has two remedies - … realized as arrears of land revenue. The second was that the Forest Department having exercised the power under Section 83 of the Forest Act, it was obligatory for it to have resold the timber at the risk of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 2001

Star Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-20-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(1) and (2), 37, 43B and 256(1); ;Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 82 and 83; ;Constitution of India - Article 299 and 299(1)

Reported in : [2001]252ITR337(Cal)

payable by the assessee is a statutory liability in view of the provision ofSection 82 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. He further submits that royalty is a tax as per the latest decision of the Supreme Court in … Income-tax Act, 1961. 20. While considering the provisions of Sections 82 and 83 of the Forest Act, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has held in … Y.R. Meena, J. 1. On an application under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following questions set out at pages 1

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2017

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-15-2017

Subject : Right to Information

comes within the defi­ nition of timber and forest produce. XI. FOREST ACT 1927 & MMDR ACT, 1957 83. We now proceed to consider the impact of 1957 Act on Forest Act, 1927 and the Transit Fee … and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by different States. State of U.P. has framed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 1957

State of West Bengal Vs. Narendra Nath Roy

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-12-1957

Subject : Civil

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Section 83, 83(2) and 83(3); ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 10

Reported in : AIR1958Cal21,61CWN472

and logs and which, according to his claim, was payable to him under Section 83(3) of the Indian Forest Act. The plaintiff further stated that he claimed this amount by his letter dated the 1st of September 1942

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 1978

Jugalkishore Asati Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-09-1978

Subject : ArbitrationCommercial

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 8(1), 37 and 37(5); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 83; Madhya Pradesh Forest Contract Rules - Rule 8

Reported in : AIR1979MP89; 1979MPLJ161

had no power to order a stoppage of working. The Divisional Forest Officer's coercive powers are given in Section 83 of the Forest Act. This contemplates two stages (a) the seizure of the forest produce and (b) the … time being in force. In the present case, admittedly, there is no statutory arbitration provided under the Indian Forest Act. A Full Bench of this Court in Rama Ratan Gupta v. State of M.P., AIR 1974 Madh Pra

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2019

Shri Mookambika Temple Vs. Mr. Raviraja Shetty

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-01-2019

Subject : Education

Jogendar Lal Saha vs. State of Bihar, [AIR1991SC1148, it was held that Sections 83 and 34 of the Forest Act, 1927 were special provisions which would prevail over the provisions of Sale of Goods Act. Similarly, in Jasbir Singh … SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; SRI S.S. MAHENDRA, AGA FOR R-2 AND R-3) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION NO.54267 OF2013DATED1802.2014.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial