Advanced Search Results
M/S. Digamber Pershad Kirti Prasad Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Othe ...
Allahabad
Apr-13-1995
Contract
Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 4(3 and 4), 20 and 26; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 83(1); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 7
AIR1996All1
retained by the seller, if full payment is not made. Sub-section (1) of Section 83 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is relevant. Sub-section (I) of Section 83 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 entitles the Forest Officer to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. and ors. Vs. Raghubir Sahai and anr.
Allahabad
Apr-07-1972
Civil
Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 82 and 83(2); Revenue Recovery Act
AIR1972All555
Indian Forest Act he was duly empowered to make such sales.5. Sections 82 and 83 of the Indian Forest Act 1927, read as follows :--'82. All money payable to the Government under this Act, or under any rule made … not have been made directly by the District Forest Officer was not correct because under the provisions of Section 83 of the Indian Forest Act he was duly empowered to make such sales.5. Sections 82 and 83 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBadri Prasad Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-16-1965
Commercial
Forest Contract Rules - Rules 1, 5, 8, 18, 18(2), 18(3), 19(3), 20, 20(2), 32 and 102A; Forest Contract Act - Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4; Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 25(1); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 83 and 83(1); Sale of Goods Act - Sections 20
AIR1966SC58; [1965]3SCR381
Act, Section 25 (1) of Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1930, Sections 83 and 83 (1) of Indian Forest Act, 1927 and Sale of Goods Act - respondent no. 2 purchased at public auction sale held by Divisional Forest
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jogendra Lal Saha Vs. the State of Bihar and Others
Supreme Court of India
Nov-06-1990
Environment
Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 11, 17, 82 and 83; Bihar Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914; Constitution of India - Article 226; Sale of Goods Act, 1930
AIR1991SC1148; 1991Supp(2)SCC654
claim was actually for damages and not the balance of the sale price. Therefore, Section 82 of the Forest Act, 1927 which authorises recovery of the amount as a public demand was not attracted and at the most the … 1930. We find that there is reference in the Allahabad decision : AIR1980All100 , to the provision of Section 83 of the Forest Act but though the provision has been quoted full implication of it has not been
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Yaqub Vs. the State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-30-1979
Commercial
Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 82 and 83
AIR1980All213
fails and is dismissed with costs. Commercial - recovery under auction sale - Sections 82 and 83 of Forest Act, 1927 - auction sale of timber - contractor made part payment for purchases - Government has two remedies - … realized as arrears of land revenue. The second was that the Forest Department having exercised the power under Section 83 of the Forest Act, it was obligatory for it to have resold the timber at the risk of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskStar Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Kolkata
Jun-20-2001
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(1) and (2), 37, 43B and 256(1); ;Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 82 and 83; ;Constitution of India - Article 299 and 299(1)
[2001]252ITR337(Cal)
payable by the assessee is a statutory liability in view of the provision ofSection 82 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. He further submits that royalty is a tax as per the latest decision of the Supreme Court in … Income-tax Act, 1961. 20. While considering the provisions of Sections 82 and 83 of the Forest Act, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has held in … Y.R. Meena, J. 1. On an application under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following questions set out at pages 1
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher
Supreme Court of India
Sep-15-2017
Right to Information
comes within the defi nition of timber and forest produce. XI. FOREST ACT 1927 & MMDR ACT, 1957 83. We now proceed to consider the impact of 1957 Act on Forest Act, 1927 and the Transit Fee … and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by different States. State of U.P. has framed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of West Bengal Vs. Narendra Nath Roy
Kolkata
Feb-12-1957
Civil
Forest Act, 1927 - Section 83, 83(2) and 83(3); ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 10
AIR1958Cal21,61CWN472
and logs and which, according to his claim, was payable to him under Section 83(3) of the Indian Forest Act. The plaintiff further stated that he claimed this amount by his letter dated the 1st of September 1942
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJugalkishore Asati Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Nov-09-1978
ArbitrationCommercial
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 8(1), 37 and 37(5); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 83; Madhya Pradesh Forest Contract Rules - Rule 8
AIR1979MP89; 1979MPLJ161
had no power to order a stoppage of working. The Divisional Forest Officer's coercive powers are given in Section 83 of the Forest Act. This contemplates two stages (a) the seizure of the forest produce and (b) the … time being in force. In the present case, admittedly, there is no statutory arbitration provided under the Indian Forest Act. A Full Bench of this Court in Rama Ratan Gupta v. State of M.P., AIR 1974 Madh Pra
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Mookambika Temple Vs. Mr. Raviraja Shetty
Karnataka
Aug-01-2019
Education
Jogendar Lal Saha vs. State of Bihar, [AIR1991SC1148, it was held that Sections 83 and 34 of the Forest Act, 1927 were special provisions which would prevail over the provisions of Sale of Goods Act. Similarly, in Jasbir Singh … SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; SRI S.S. MAHENDRA, AGA FOR R-2 AND R-3) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION NO.54267 OF2013DATED1802.2014.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »