Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1927 section 80 · Page 1 of about 110 results (0.044 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 22 1951

Biswambhar Singh and anr. Vs. Secretary to the Government of Orissa, R ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Oct-22-1951

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 80 and 80(1)

Reported in : AIR1952Ori28

of Orissa) against the following notification issued by the Government of Orissa under Section 80 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927.'Revenue Department Notification The 6th April, 1950. No. 3991-R.: In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (a) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 1957

Maheswari Prasad Deo Vs. the State of Orissa and Two ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jul-18-1957

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 80; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1957Ori219

In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (a) of Sub-section CD of Section 80 of the Indian Forest Act 1927 (XVI of 1927), read with the notification of the Government of Orissa in the Home Department No. 2

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2006

Rohit Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar (Now State of Jharkhand) and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-17-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29; Bihar Land Reforms Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 and 105(1) - Order 1, Rule 10(2) - Order 8, Rules 1, 6A, 6E and 9

Reported in : AIR2007SC10; 2006(6)ALT45(SC); 2007(1)AWC1(SC); (SCSuppl)2007(1)CHN44; JT2006(9)SC145; 2007(I)OLR(SC)266; (2007)146PLR790; 2006(10)SCALE258; 2006(2)LC1363(SC)

They pleaded that the property was vested forest having been notified as such under Section 29 of the Forest Act, 1927, which remained vested in the State; that the plaintiff had no cause of action and that the suit … plaintiff had no cause of action and that the suit was not maintainable for want of notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The suit went to trial. Evidence was closed. Arguments concluded. Judgment was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 12 2004

Punjab Urban Development Authority and ors. Vs. Dashmesh Educational S ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-12-2004

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 77, 166 and 177; Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952 - Sections 6(6); Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 - Sections 4, 5 and 11; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 35; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 1, Rule 10; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 3(26); Transfer of Property Act, 1881 - Sections 2(6); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20; Forest Law

Reported in : (2005)139PLR238

Act had no applicability as there is no notification issued under Section 4 and 5 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 declaring the land in question to be a 'reserved forest', in relation to the notification issued under SectionSection 151 C.P.C. for interim injunction was also moved by the Plaintiff- Respondent No. 1. Another Application under Section 80(2) read with Section 151 CPC was also moved seeking dispensation of advance notice required to be served upon

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2018

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-24-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … portion of the schedule are extracted hereunder : “NOTIFICATION Delhi, the 10th April, 1980. No.F. SCO32c) Noti - 80-81.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 29 the Indian Forest Act, 1927, read with the Government

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2018

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-24-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … portion of the schedule are extracted hereunder : “NOTIFICATION Delhi, the 10th April, 1980. No.F. SCO32c) Noti - 80-81.- In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 29 the Indian Forest Act, 1927, read with the Government

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2005

Brajesh Kumar Ray and anr., Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-16-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29 and 33; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 and 151, Order 39 - Rules 1 and 2A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 144 and 145

Reported in : [2005(3)JCR464(Jhr)]

petitioners, is that the Government of Bihar, in exercise of power conferred under Section 29 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (Act XIV of 1927), issued a Notification on 9th July, 1958, declaring the lands, mentioned in the Schedule … on 12th October, 1996, whereinafter, the Samiti preferred Title Suit No. 7 of 1997 after serving notice under Section 80, CPC. It is stated that the suit was filed for permanent injunction. The Divisional Forest Officer filed written

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 1994

Mohinder Pal Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-09-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Kutlehar Forest (Acquisition of Management) Act, 1992 - Sections 1, 4 and 5; ;Constitution of India - Articles 31, 31A, 31A(1), 31A(2), 31C, 39 and 245

Reported in : AIR1995HP15

officer duly appointed in that behalf by the State Government.' 11. These provisions form part of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 as Sections 80 and 81. They provide for the management of forest either by the Government or by … opportunity to establish to the contrary by the person concerned has been made part of the provisions of Section 80 before confiscation of the share is actually resorted to. The entrustment of the management of the forest contemplated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2013

Yeshwantrao D. Chowgule (Since Deceased, Through L.R.S) and Others Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : May-10-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

prior to the notification dated 1/2/1965 declaring it as a reserved forest for the purpose of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Learned Judge held that the evidence on record shows that the cairns came to be destroyed by the … in their favour, though subsequently, the said Criminal complaint got dismissed for default. Chowgules then gave notice under Section 80 of C.P.C. to the Government. Shri V. K. Chowdhari, the Dy. Collector and Estate Officer served a notice

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2017

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-15-2017

Subject : Right to Information

and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by different States. State of U.P. has framed … refers to notification dated 10.02.1960 issued under proviso to sub­section (3) of Section 29 as well as Section 80A of 1927 Act. (vi) (a)One of the submissions raised by learned counsel for the petitioner is that Rule

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial