Advanced Search Results

Mohinder Pal Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Kutlehar Forest (Acquisition of Management) Act, 1992 - Sections 1, 4 and 5; ;Constitution of India - Articles 31, 31A, 31A(1), 31A(2), 31C, 39 and 245

Reported in : AIR1995HP15

officer duly appointed in that behalf by the State Government.' 11. These provisions form part of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 as Sections 80 and 81. They provide for the management of forest either by the Government or by … the Government and private individual in forests was for the first time recognised by the Legislature while enacting Section 79 of the Indian Forest Act, 1878. It was a time when the Government was attempting to establish its

K. Abdul Rahiman and ors. Vs. Divisional Forest Officer and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 79; Constitution of India - Article 299; Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1989Ker1

in the circumstances of the case, no costs. (i) Civil - right to adjudicate - Section 79 of Forest Act, 1927, Aritcle 299 of Constitution of India and Section 7 of Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968 - provisions allowing

Lal Chand Vs. the Collector of Sirmur and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 300; ;Forest Act, 1927 - Section 82; ;Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 - Sections 70, 97 and 98; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 79

Reported in : AIR1952HP16

stores. Reducing this amount to Rs. 1285/12/9, and treating it as payable to the Government under the Indian Forest Act (XVI of 1927), the Chief Conservator of Forests Himachal Pradesh moved respondent No. 1 on 17-1-1951 under Section … ofIHimachal Pradesh for, according to him, the respondents represent that Government. This argument totally ignores the provisions of Section 79, Civil P. C., which lays down, inter alia, that the authority to be named as defendant in the

Col. Sawai Bhawani Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct TaxationMiscellaneous

Acts : Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 8, 8(1), 8(2), 8(3), 16, 16(2), 16(12), 58(2), 71, 73, 74, 78, 79, 85, 86, 99, 111, 112 and 333; ;Income Tax Act 1961 - Section 132; ;Antiquities and Treasures Act, 1972; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(2) and 24B; ;Customs Act, 1962; ;Sea Customs Act 1878 - Section 167(8); ;Forest Act, 1927 - Section 59A(2) and 59G; ;Defence of India Rules

under the GCA are not quasi criminal. The above case concerned confiscation proceedings under Section 59G of the Forest Act 1927 as amended by the West Bengal Act 22 of 1988. In the context of those provisions it was … imposed have to be viewed. Section 78 provides for a statutory adjudication by the Gold Control Officer and Section 79 talks of 'giving an opportunity to the owner of the gold etc.' Section 79 of the GCA reads

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by different States. State of U.P. has framed … of water, the nature of the produce i.e. limestone, does not change. Hence, limestone is a forest produce. 79. Dolomite is a sedimentary rock. Dolomite is formed by the post depositional alteration of lime mud and limestone

ishwar Chandra Gupta and ors Vs. State of U.P. and ors

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Section 2, 3, 3A, 3B, 4, 4A, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 13, 13A, 13B, 16, 19 ; U.P. Societies Registration Rules, 1976 - Rule 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19

The Prescribed Authority has passed the order in exercise of power provided under Section 61-B(2) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (as amended vide The Indian Forest (Uttar Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2000) as well as under Section 34-A of … is a necessary party, as is provided under Article 300 of the Constitution of India and also under Section 79 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In support of his submission he cited a case i.e. Chief Conservator

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

reform came up for consideration. It was contended that the provisions of 1960 Act were repugnant to the Forest Act, 1927. Section 4A providing for vesting was introduced in the 1960 Act by amendment in the year 1978. On the … implements" were `materials' within these words. . . . `Material' includes a painter's bucket of distemper and brush." 79. In Webster's Third New International Dictionary at p. 1934 the word `resources' has been defined thus: "available means

Parisar an Organisation and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 31(D), 37 and 37(1); Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 48A, 51A and 226

Reported in : 1990(1)BomCR79

the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 were not applicable.The expression 'forest land' had not been defined under the Indian Forest Act, 1927 or under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Section 3 of the Indian Forest Act, however, gives some clue … the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Janu Chandra Waghmare v. The State of Maharashtra 79 Bom.L.R. 499. One of the question involved in that case was whether the word forest would include 'forest

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … & Ors. and of this Court in Bhagat Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr. (paras 79 to95) X. Contours of the rights of the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … & Ors. and of this Court in Bhagat Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr. (paras 79 to95) X. Contours of the rights of the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs