Advanced Search Results

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. Sitapur Packing Wood Suppliers Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other TaxesConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Transit of Timber and Other Forest Produce Rules, 1978 - Rules 3, 4(1), 5, 6(4), 14 and 15; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 41(2), 42, 51 and 76; Uttar Pradesh Resin and Other Forest Produce (Regulation of Trade) Act, 1976

Reported in : AIR2003SC2165; JT2002(4)SC341; 2002(4)SCALE26; (2002)4SCC566; [2002]3SCR345

have been framed in exercise of the powers under Sections 41 42 51 and 76 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Rule 3 provides for regulation of transit of forest produce by means of passes. It places restrictions on … the levy of transit fee is invalid.4. The Rules have been framed in exercise of the powers under Sections 41 42 51 and 76 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Rule 3 provides for regulation of transit

Jawahar Lal Sharma and anr. Vs. Divisional Forest Officer, U.P. and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 76; Uttar Pradesh Establishment and Regulations of Saw Mills Rules, 1978 - Rule 1

Reported in : AIR2002SC769; JT2002(1)SC413; 2002(1)SCALE320; (2002)3SCC42

made hereinabove, then the former shall be given effect to. The appeals stands disposed of accordingly. Civil - Forest Act, 1927 - Section 76 - Uttar Pradesh Establishment and Regulations of Saw Mills Rules, 1978 - Rule 1 -Renewal

Rajiv SarIn and anr Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kumaun and Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960 - Section 4A, 18(1)(cc), 19(1)(b), 3(10), 8; UP Amendment Act 1978 ; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 ; Indian Forests Act 1927 - Section 36, 37, 84; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 40; Government of India Act. - Section 76, 107(2); Constitution of India. - Article 254, 31(2), 300A; Punjab Act - Section 10

senior counsel appearing for the appellants raised two contentions in the context of the inter-relation of the Indian Forest Act 1927 and the KUZALR Act; firstly, the case of alleged discrimination in as much as the Central Act i.e. … similar to that of the Central Act and therefore, sought and obtained the permission of the President under Section 76 of the Government of India Act. Thus, in the State, there are two Acts, which are applicable viz.

Shaik HussaIn Vs. Divisional Forest Officer, Proddatur, Cuddapah Distr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Saw Mills (Regulation) Rules, 1969 - Rule 3, 3(1), (2), (3), 5(2), 7 and 7(1)(2); Andhra Pradesh Forest Produce Transit Rules, 1970; Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967 - Sections 2, 29, 29(2), 68 and 68(1); Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 41(1), (2), 42 and 76; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 301; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 11; Andhra Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1981

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD650; 2001(5)ALT187

The question as to whether such rules framed in terms of Sections 41, 42, and 76(d) of the Forest Act, 1927 are legal and valid, camp up for consideration before the Apex Court in State of Bihar v. Ranchi … requiring all the saw-pit holders or depot holders to obtain regulatory licences squarely fall within clause (d) of Section 76, if not, (without holding so) under the power to regulate transit by land or air available under Section

Kaniram and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 26, 36 and 76; Madhya Pradesh Grazing Rules, 1979 - Rules 2, 3 and 4

Reported in : AIR1983MP86

Rules, 1979, framed by the State Government in exercise of powers conferred by Section 76 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. For the year 1982, the applications of the petitioners for grant of grazing licences were, however, not accepted

State of Bihar and Others Vs. Ranchi Timber Traders Association, Etc. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : EnvironmentConstitution

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41(1), 42 and 76; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 310

Reported in : 1996VIIAD(SC)391; AIR1996SC2774; 1996(5)SCALE498; (1996)5SCC276; [1996]Supp3SCR842

clear from the prefatory portion of the rules, those are Sections 41, 42 and 76 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Section 41 empowers the State Government to make rules to regulate the transit of forest produce. Sub-section 1 of

Lakshman and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Grazing Rules, 1979 - Rule 7; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2, 32 and 76; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 301

Reported in : AIR1983SC656; 1983(1)SCALE577; (1983)3SCC275; [1983]3SCR124

Indian is a foreigner in any of the constituent States of India. The plan was this: The Indian Forest Act 1927 enabled the State Government to make rules to regulate the cutting of grass and pasturing of cattle in … pasturing of cattle in protected forests (Section 32(i) and, generally, to carry out the provisions of the Act (Section 76). We may note here'cattle' as defined by Section 2(i) includes buffaloes, sheep, goats and many other specie of

Harun and Brothers Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 41, 42, 51 and 76; Uttar Pradesh Transit of Timber and other Forest Produce Rules, 1978 - Rules 3 and 5

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC542

Pradesh in exercise of power conferred upon it under Sections 41, 42, 51 and 76 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter called the 'Act').4. Rule 3 of the Rules provides that no forest produce shall be moved into … called the 'Rules'), made by the State of Uttar Pradesh in exercise of power conferred upon it under Sections 41, 42, 51 and 76 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter called the 'Act').4. Rule 3 of

State of Tripura and Others Vs. Sudhir Ranjan Nath

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 15, 19, 37, 39(3 and 4), 41(2), 42, 76, 77, 78 and 548; Tripura Transit Rules - Rules 3(5) and 32; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 110(2), 119(2), 301, 302 and 304; Union Territories (Laws) Act, 1950; Mysore Forest Act - Sections 37; Essential Commodities Act, 1955

Reported in : AIR1997SC1168; JT1997(2)SC530; 1997(2)SCALE154; (1997)3SCC665; [1997]2SCR29; 1997(1)UJ563(SC)

of the Transit Rules framed by the Government of Tripura under Section 41 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 as illegal and ultravires the Constitution. The correctness of the said decision is challenged by the State of … said levy. Neither the powers conferred upon the State government by Section 41 nor the power conferred by Section 76 comprehend the levy of export duty. The power to levy duty is conferred only upon one named authority,

State of M.P. Vs. S.P. Sales Agencies and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(3), 2(4), 20, 41, 42, 44(2), 44(2A), 52, 52A, 52B, 76; Madhya Pradesh Transit (Forest Produce) Rules, 1961- Rules 3, 29 and 29(1); Himachal Pradesh Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1969 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2004SC2088; 2004(3)ALD134(SC); 2004CriLJ1832; JT2004(4)SC245; 2004(4)SCALE52; (2004)4SCC448

allowed and seizure of stock of kattha and cutch under the provisions of Section 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 ('Act' for short) for violation of provisions of Rule 3 of Madhya Pradesh Transit (Forest Produce) Rules, 1961 … to frame rules prescribing thereunder penalties for breach of the rules framed under Section 41 of the Act. Section 76 confers additional powers upon the State Government to makes rules for, inter alia, carrying out provisions of the