Advanced Search Results

State of Maharashtra and anr. Vs. Maharashtra Land Development Corpora ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Private Forests Act, 1975 - Sections 2 and 6; Bombay Salsette Estate Act, 1951 - Sections 4; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 35(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR24

was issued by the State Government to the Company under sub-section (3) of section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 calling upon the Company, the owner of the land, to show cause as to why notification under sub-section … and 345-C. The land which was acquired was Survey No. 345-B. From the remaining land, land admeasuring about 75 acres was given Survey No. 345-C and the land in question admeasuring about 209 acres was given Survey

Raj Homes Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionProperty

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Rules - Rules 1 to 12, 13, 14, 15, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 33, 34, 35 and 36; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 2(1), 58, 58(2), 59, 59(1), 59(2), 59(3), 59(5), 75 to 98, 258 and 258(2); Constitution of India - Article 14; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957; Indian Forest Act, 1927; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1954

Reported in : 2009(1)MPHT347(SC); 2008(11)SCALE759; (2008)9SCC500

on any land situated in the areas which are constituted as reserved or protected forests under the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (16 of 1927), with reference to use of land for any of the purposes aforesaid shall not be … the learned Counsel for the State, reliance of the appellants on Sections 75 to 98 is of no relevance in the present case since they … any non-agricultural purpose is diverted to any agricultural purpose no premium shall be imposed under Sub-section (5) of Section 59 of the Code.14. (1) For the purpose of levy of premium on agricultural land other than the

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by different States. State of U.P. has framed … not in dispute.88. The validity of 1957 Act was considered in the context of Industries (Development and Regulation) 75 Act,1951 and Mines and Minerals(Development and Regulation) Act, 1948. This Court repelled challenge to the 1952 Act on

Janu Chandra Waghmare and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 31, 31-B, 31(2), 228A, 245, 246, 246(3), 248, 255, 301 to 307, 366, 367 and 368; Constitution of India (40th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(6), 2(7), 3, 4 to 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16, 16(1) and 17; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Sale of Trees by Occupants belonging to Scheduled Tribes (Regulation) Act, 1959 - Sections 5 and 6; Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 2(5), 2(6), 2(7), 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3

Reported in : AIR1978Bom119; (1977)79BOMLR499

was passed on 28-10-1974. On 14-5-1975 the State Government issued a notification under Section 35(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 in respect of the 1st petitioner's said private forest.4, Further, during the pendency of the petition the Maharashtra

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

reform came up for consideration. It was contended that the provisions of 1960 Act were repugnant to the Forest Act, 1927. Section 4A providing for vesting was introduced in the 1960 Act by amendment in the year 1978. On the … order was passed by the Governor on 3.12.2001: "I RESERVE THIS BILL FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF THE PRESIDENT." 75. The Bill was forwarded by letter of the Law Secretary dated 15.1.2004. On 27.2.2004 the Law Secretary sent

Mohinder Pal Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Kutlehar Forest (Acquisition of Management) Act, 1992 - Sections 1, 4 and 5; ;Constitution of India - Articles 31, 31A, 31A(1), 31A(2), 31C, 39 and 245

Reported in : AIR1995HP15

officer duly appointed in that behalf by the State Government.' 11. These provisions form part of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 as Sections 80 and 81. They provide for the management of forest either by the Government or by … the legislation cannot be impugned on that basis.33. The petitioner was allowed 75% of the gross income taking into consideration that a part of the … Before passing of this Act, the State Government issued Notification No. Rev. D(F)7-1/90, dated January 19, 1990, under Section 3 of the Punjab Resumption of Jagirs Article 1957 directing the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests to take

State of Madhya Pradesh and anr. Vs. Firm Gobardhan Dass Kailash Nath

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : State Forest Contract Rules - Rule 30(3)

Reported in : AIR1973SC1164; (1973)1SCC668

the said difference as arrears of land revenue, purporting to do so under Section 82 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, and the Rewa State Forest Contract Rules, 1935 relating to such tenders.5. The respondent firm thereupon filed two … failed to deposit the balance of the said initial deposit of 25 per cent as also the remaining 75 per cent of the purchase price within time, the Forest authorities served upon the firm a notice dated

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Aircrafts Act; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act 1888 - Sections 354A; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 4(1), 9 and 10(1); Cantonment Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5; Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 57; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 141, 226, 227, 245, 246, 246(1), 300A and 372(1); Development Control Regulations, 1991;Evidence Act - Sections 114; Forest Act, 1865 - Sections 34A and 38; Forest Act, 1878; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Government of India Act 1935; Greater Bombay Laws and the Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 1, 2, 2A, 3 to 26, 34., 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3), 35(4), 36, 36A, 36B, 36C, 37 and 38; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11A; Limitat

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

the individual petitions. The action proceeds on the basis that once notice under Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, hereinafter referred to as '1927 Act', is issued, any land in respect of which such notice has been

In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands versus

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1480

Matched in: Judge BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI * , AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH 1480 : 2025 INSC 754 In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands [(I.A. No. 12465 of 2019 with I.A. No. 98194 of 2019, I.A. No. 127871 of 2020, I.A. No. 127874 of 2020, I.A. No. 44062 of 2025, I.A. No. 66986 and 74569 of 2025) In (Writ Petition (C) No. 202 of 1995)] In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of Issue pertains to the status of Zudpi Jungle or Zudpi Forest in the six districts of State of Maharashtra; and whether the recommendations made by the CEC in its 2025 Report should be accepted or not. …

Chintamani Gajanan Velkar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 6, 24(1) and 34A; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 35(1) and 35(3)

Reported in : AIR2000SC1073; 2000(2)ALLMR(SC)571; JT2000(2)SC62; 2000(1)SCALE524; (2000)3SCC143; [2000]1SCR570; 2000(1)LC582(SC)

the Maharashtra Act, 1975 came into force inasmuch as notice was issued under Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 on 29-8-1975 and was not served on the land-holder before 30-8-1975 but was served only thereafter on 12-9-1975.