Advanced Search Results

Col. Sawai Bhawani Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct TaxationMiscellaneous

Acts : Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 8, 8(1), 8(2), 8(3), 16, 16(2), 16(12), 58(2), 71, 73, 74, 78, 79, 85, 86, 99, 111, 112 and 333; ;Income Tax Act 1961 - Section 132; ;Antiquities and Treasures Act, 1972; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(2) and 24B; ;Customs Act, 1962; ;Sea Customs Act 1878 - Section 167(8); ;Forest Act, 1927 - Section 59A(2) and 59G; ;Defence of India Rules

under the GCA are not quasi criminal. The above case concerned confiscation proceedings under Section 59G of the Forest Act 1927 as amended by the West Bengal Act 22 of 1988. In the context of those provisions it was … Petitioners had contravened Sections 8 and 16 GCA and had therefore rendered themselves liable to penal action under Section 74 GCA. A penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs was imposed on the Petitioner No. 1 Col. Sawai Bhawani Singh

In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands versus

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1480

Matched in: Judge BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI * , AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH 1480 : 2025 INSC 754 In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands [(I.A. No. 12465 of 2019 with I.A. No. 98194 of 2019, I.A. No. 127871 of 2020, I.A. No. 127874 of 2020, I.A. No. 44062 of 2025, I.A. No. 66986 and 74569 of 2025) In (Writ Petition (C) No. 202 of 1995)] In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of Issue pertains to the status of Zudpi Jungle or Zudpi Forest in the six districts of State of Maharashtra; and whether the recommendations made by the CEC in its 2025 Report should be accepted or not. …

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by different States. State of U.P. has framed … the State did not commit any error in demanding the Transit Fee on tran­ sit of aforesaid goods. 74. It goes without saying that on forest produce which are exempted by notification issued under Proviso to Rule

Vijay Rajmohan Vs. State Represented By The Inspector Of Police

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

faith. This protection is only to ensure that a public servant 18 For example, Section 74 of Indian Forest Act, 1927 or Section 88 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 provide as under: - Section 74. Indemnity

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

reform came up for consideration. It was contended that the provisions of 1960 Act were repugnant to the Forest Act, 1927. Section 4A providing for vesting was introduced in the 1960 Act by amendment in the year 1978. On the

Satelite Developers Limited and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the present case. 4. It is not in dispute that notices under section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 were issued sometime in 1956 in respect of these lands. However, after issuance of notices, no steps were … The Apex Court in the said judgment has observed in paras 1, 54, 55, 61, 62, 63, 72, 74 as under:- "1. Leave granted. The Principal question for consideration is whether the mere issuance of a notice

Rama Shankar Singh @ R.S. Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand,

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Property

as yet, and that the claim of the raiyats due to non-enquiry under Section 29(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 has not been extinguished as yet. It was further held that the plaintiffs are in peaceful uninterrupted continuous

Ramendra Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

as Dumpers bearing registration not MP26-D/3150 and MP23-D/5004 under Section 26 (1), 30 and 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 read with Section 2 (2) of the Forest 2 Conservation Act, 1980. 03. The undisputed facts are that … as not to be easily movable; (e) when the original is a public document within the meaning of section 74; (f) when the original is a document of which a certified copy is permitted by this Act, or

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … such utilization “except with the prior approval of the Central Government”. W.P.(C)No.365/2017 & FAO(OS)No.200/2017 Page 44 of 95 74. The question as to what land would constitute ‘forest’, the contours of the prohibitions under the Forest (Conservation)

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … such utilization “except with the prior approval of the Central Government”. W.P.(C)No.365/2017 & FAO(OS)No.200/2017 Page 44 of 95 74. The question as to what land would constitute ‘forest’, the contours of the prohibitions under the Forest (Conservation)