Advanced Search Results

Janu Chandra Waghmare and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 31, 31-B, 31(2), 228A, 245, 246, 246(3), 248, 255, 301 to 307, 366, 367 and 368; Constitution of India (40th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(6), 2(7), 3, 4 to 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16, 16(1) and 17; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Sale of Trees by Occupants belonging to Scheduled Tribes (Regulation) Act, 1959 - Sections 5 and 6; Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 2(5), 2(6), 2(7), 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3

Reported in : AIR1978Bom119; (1977)79BOMLR499

was passed on 28-10-1974. On 14-5-1975 the State Government issued a notification under Section 35(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 in respect of the 1st petitioner's said private forest.4, Further, during the pendency of the petition the Maharashtra … the Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975, being Act No. 29 of 1975, as amended by Act No. 72 of 1975. The constitutional validity of the said Act has been mainly challenged on three grounds: (a) that

Kuldeep Sharma Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012CrLJ2040; 2012(3)KLT28(SN)(C.No.28)

appear in proceedings before any person who is legally authorised to take evidence. Shri Saxena then relied on section 72 of 1927 Act which reads thus - “72. State Government may invest Forest officers with certain powers. (1) … an accused is entitled to engage an advocate in seizure/confiscation proceedings before the Authorised Officer under the Indian Forest Act, 1927? (2) The petitioner's request for engaging an advocate in confiscation proceedings is turned down by communicating the order

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

and the Transit Fee Rules 1978 framed under Section 41 of 1927 Act. The Indian Forest Act, 1927 72 is a pre­constitutional legislation enacted by Indian legislature as per Section 63 of Government of India Act, 1915. … and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by different States. State of U.P. has framed

Dr. Emerico D'Souza Vs. State through the Deputy Conservator of Forest ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 57, 59(A) and 72(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25 and 30

Reported in : 1995(1)BomCR266

the Range Forest Officer of the accused, during the investigation of a forest offence under the Indian Forests Act, 1927, are hit by section 25 or 30 of the Evidence Act. The petitioner is involved in an offence … asked to be considered by the Court.6. The learned advocate for the petitioner has drawn my attention to section 72 of the Indian Forests Act which provides that :---'Section 72 :---State Government may invest Forest Officers with certain … 30 of the Evidence Act. The petitioner is involved in an offence under section 52 of the Indian Forest Act read with Rule 64 of the G.D.D. Forest Rules, 1964 for possessing illegally forest timber. This transaction involved

Arjun Ratansing Jadhav Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

for examination previous to the grant of a pass in respect thereof. (viii) As per provisions of Indian Forest Act 1927, Section 69 which states as under ; Sec. 69- Presumption that the Forest Produce belongs to Government - When … possession of Salai and Kad gum. The Deputy Conservator of Forest, Yawal Division, under powers as per Section 72(1)(c) of Indian Forest Act, 1927 (Forest Act for short) was entitled to search the gum which had been

R.K.ShuklA. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 72, 57 ; The Right To Information Act, 2005 ;

acquainted with the procedural aspects, as he is to discharge statutory functions under section 72 of the Indian Forest Act. He is to conduct proceedings where attendance of witnesses is to be enforced and various Panchnamas are to

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … road clearly manifests that it was very much in use prior to its blockage W.P.(C)No.365/2017 & FAO(OS)No.200/2017 Page 72 of 95 on 29th of May 2017 by erection of a make shift barrier of iron pipes placed

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … road clearly manifests that it was very much in use prior to its blockage W.P.(C)No.365/2017 & FAO(OS)No.200/2017 Page 72 of 95 on 29th of May 2017 by erection of a make shift barrier of iron pipes placed

Satelite Developers Limited and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the present case. 4. It is not in dispute that notices under section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 were issued sometime in 1956 in respect of these lands. However, after issuance of notices, no steps were … (supra). The Apex Court in the said judgment has observed in paras 1, 54, 55, 61, 62, 63, 72, 74 as under:- "1. Leave granted. The Principal question for consideration is whether the mere issuance of a

Deewan Chand Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 82

Reported in : AIR1971All200

recovered as arrears of land revenue. There is considerable force in this argument. Section 82 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, provides for the recovery of money due to Government under the Act in the following terms:--'All money payable … in respect of forest-produce, this Court held in Firm Gobardhan Das v. Collector of Mirzapur, AIR 1956 All 721 that such loss was not included in the term 'price' and, thereafter, it could not be recovered under