Advanced Search Results

Karna Laxman Gawali and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(1), 2(3), 2(6), 2(7), 25, 26, 26(1), 52, 52(1), 55, 61-A, 61-A(3), 61(B), 61-D, 70 and 71; Indian Forest (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 61A to 61G; Cattle Trespass Act, 1871 - Sections 71

Reported in : (1989)91BOMLR134; 1990CriLJ163; 1989MhLJ780

Can the cattle instrumental in the commission of forest offence under S. 26(1)(d) and/or (f) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (the Act) be confiscated under S. 61-A(3) of the Act, is a point of some importance raised in … of the Act which permits seizure and impounding of cattle by any Forest Officer or Police Officer. By Section 71, fines fixed under the Cattle Trespass Act is altered.4. The learned Counsel for the petitioners, contended that power

Col. Sawai Bhawani Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct TaxationMiscellaneous

Acts : Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 8, 8(1), 8(2), 8(3), 16, 16(2), 16(12), 58(2), 71, 73, 74, 78, 79, 85, 86, 99, 111, 112 and 333; ;Income Tax Act 1961 - Section 132; ;Antiquities and Treasures Act, 1972; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(2) and 24B; ;Customs Act, 1962; ;Sea Customs Act 1878 - Section 167(8); ;Forest Act, 1927 - Section 59A(2) and 59G; ;Defence of India Rules

under the GCA are not quasi criminal. The above case concerned confiscation proceedings under Section 59G of the Forest Act 1927 as amended by the West Bengal Act 22 of 1988. In the context of those provisions it was … seized from the different palaces belonging to the parties and mentioned in the two show cause notices under Section 71 GCA. It was directed that the seized gold would however be released and handed over to the owner

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by different States. State of U.P. has framed … will come in the category of “manufacture” or “pro­ duction” under Section 80­IA of the Income Tax Act.” 71. In the above view, this Court held that assessee was entitled for the benefit of Section 80­1A of

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … come into existence?. (paras 47 to70) VIII. Availability of and prohibitions under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (paras 71 to78) IX. Fencing of the forest - requirement and permissibility - orders of the Supreme Court in M.C.

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … come into existence?. (paras 47 to70) VIII. Availability of and prohibitions under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (paras 71 to78) IX. Fencing of the forest - requirement and permissibility - orders of the Supreme Court in M.C.

Charidesa Krusak Surakhya Sangh and Another Vs. State of Orissa and Ot ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Land Acquisition

the KVK submitted as follows: (a) The GoverNo.of Orissa in exercise of powers under Section 27(1) of Indian Forest Act, 1927 issued a notification dated 27.10.1953, deserving an area of 2088 acres inter alia, in Mouza Rahangol and declaring … v. Union of India, (1996) 5 SCC 647; 4. AP Pollution Control Board v. M.V.Naidu, (1992) 2 SCC 718; 5. M.C.Mehta v. Union of India (2002) 4 SCC 356; 6. M.C.Mehta v. Union of India (1998) 9

State of Gujarat Vs. Dhansukhlal Amrutlal Purohit

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 61, 62 and 71

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2647

of the Maruti Car.4. The ld. Sessions Judge has considered the scheme of Section 61 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, as amended in the year 1983. It is not the finding that no offence punishable under the Forest … as substantive piece of evidence in inquiry by the authorities dealing with the proceedings under Sections 61/62 and 71 of the Forest Act.9. For short, the finding recorded by the ld. Sessions Judge in the present case

Godrej and Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

consideration is whether the mere issuance of a notice under the provisions of Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is sufficient for any land being declared a “private forest” within the meaning of that expression as defined … certainly acted in a fatuous manner in entering into such an agreement.” It was further held in paragraph 71 of the Report that, “The agreement smacks of arbitrariness, unfairness and favouritism. The agreement was opposed to public

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

reform came up for consideration. It was contended that the provisions of 1960 Act were repugnant to the Forest Act, 1927. Section 4A providing for vesting was introduced in the 1960 Act by amendment in the year 1978. On the

Shri Mookambika Temple Vs. Mr. Raviraja Shetty

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

Jogendar Lal Saha vs. State of Bihar, [AIR1991SC1148, it was held that Sections 83 and 34 of the Forest Act, 1927 were special provisions which would prevail over the provisions of Sale of Goods Act. Similarly, in Jasbir Singh … SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; SRI S.S. MAHENDRA, AGA FOR R-2 AND R-3) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION NO.54267 OF2013DATED1802.2014.