Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1927 section 70 · Page 1 of about 87 results (0.023 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 23 1966

Janardan Sahu Vs. Arakhit Sahu

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-23-1966

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 70; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 439; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Cattle Trespass Act, 1871 - Sections 20 and 22

Reported in : AIR1967Ori150; 33(1967)CLT226; 1967CriLJ1354

roads, pleasure grounds, plantations, canals, drainage works, embankment and the like. But in Section 70 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, there is a deeming clause provided which says: '70. Cattle trespassing in a reserved forest or in any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 1989

Karna Laxman Gawali and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-27-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(1), 2(3), 2(6), 2(7), 25, 26, 26(1), 52, 52(1), 55, 61-A, 61-A(3), 61(B), 61-D, 70 and 71; Indian Forest (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 61A to 61G; Cattle Trespass Act, 1871 - Sections 71

Reported in : (1989)91BOMLR134; 1990CriLJ163; 1989MhLJ780

Can the cattle instrumental in the commission of forest offence under S. 26(1)(d) and/or (f) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (the Act) be confiscated under S. 61-A(3) of the Act, is a point of some importance raised in … this is the specific purpose with which change in law is brought about.7. It is contended that since Section 70 specifically deals with the cattle trespass and no change is brought about in the said provision, it should

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2011

Afjal Imam. Vs. State of Bihar and Others.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-19-2011

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Municipal Act, 2007 -Sections 21 (3), 27, 25(4), 17, 25 (4), 23 (3), 21 (3), 21 (4) ; atna Municipal Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 36, 20 (d), '; Howrah Act - Sections 6 (2), 7 (d) ; Calcutta Act - Section 8 (2), 9 (d)(e) ; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Section 37 ; M.P. and Chattisgarh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Section 70 ; Forest Act 1927 - Sections 52 (3)

of Jharkhand and Anr. v. Govind Singh, reported in 2005 (10) SCC 437, which was a case under Forest Act, 1927. The High Court had read into sections 52 (3) of the Act, the power to direct release of … old Council members or appoint new members in their place.(iii) The same is the effect and import of section 70 (in place since the 1998 Amendment) of the M.P. and Chattisgarh Municipalities Act, 1961. Section 70 deals with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 29 1951

Lal Chand Vs. the Collector of Sirmur and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-29-1951

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 300; ;Forest Act, 1927 - Section 82; ;Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 - Sections 70, 97 and 98; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 79

Reported in : AIR1952HP16

stores. Reducing this amount to Rs. 1285/12/9, and treating it as payable to the Government under the Indian Forest Act (XVI of 1927), the Chief Conservator of Forests Himachal Pradesh moved respondent No. 1 on 17-1-1951 under Section … 200/ 10/3. However, on 23-6-1951 respondent No. 2, in compliance presumably with respondent No. 1's order, distrained under Section 70 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1887) three buffaloes, a bullock and two cows of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2017

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-15-2017

Subject : Right to Information

and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by different States. State of U.P. has framed … in Kumaon Stone Crusher deserves to be set aside in so far as above aspect is concerned. 66 70. Now, we come to the case of marble slabs & tiles, chips etc. Writ Petitioners have placed reliance

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 1966

K.P. Chowdhary Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-15-1966

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 82 and 85; Madhya Pradesh Forest Contract Rules - Rules 28 and 29; Constitution of India - Article 299 and 299(1); Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 155; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 175(3); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70

Reported in : AIR1967SC203; [1966]3SCR919

this Court. 13. Appeal allowed. Commercial - arrears of land revenue - Sections 82 and 85 of Indian Forest Act, 1927, Rules 28 and 29 of Madhya Pradesh Forest Contract Rules, Articles 299 and 299 (1) of Constitution of … 155 of Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959, Section 175 (3) of Government of India Act, 1935 and Section 70 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 - questions arising in this appeal is whether Article 299 hits an implied

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2018

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-24-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … Haryana-Delhi. The Delhi Ridge stretches over a distance of 35 km, from Bhatti Mines to Southeast of the 700 year old Tughlaqabad, branching in different directions, and finally tapering towards the northern end near Wazirabad on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2018

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-24-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … Haryana-Delhi. The Delhi Ridge stretches over a distance of 35 km, from Bhatti Mines to Southeast of the 700 year old Tughlaqabad, branching in different directions, and finally tapering towards the northern end near Wazirabad on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1984

State of Haryana and ors. Vs. Lal Chand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-02-1984

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Sections 22, 27, 28, 34, 58(1), 59 and 60; Punjab Liquor Licence Rules, 1956 - Rule 36(2), 36(3), 36(4), 36(16), 36(22-A), 36(23), 36(23)(1), 36(23)(2), 36(23-A) and 37(8-B); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 299(1); Indian Forest Act, 1927; Forest Contract Rules

Reported in : AIR1984SC1326; 1984(1)SCALE690; (1984)3SCC634; [1984]3SCR715; 1984(16)LC722(SC)

in K.P. Chowdhary's, Mulamchand's, Rattan Lal's and Firm Gobardhan Dass's cases, supra, there are provisions in the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and the Forest Contract Rules framed thereunder for entering into a formal deed between the forest contractor and … as also the defaulted instalments of the licence fee payable in respect of a liquor vend issued under Section 60 of the Punjab Excise Act 1914 ('Act' for short).2. Put very shortly, the essential facts are these.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 2007

Rajendra Kumar Gupta Son of Shyam Sundar Vs. State of U.P. Through Sec ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-15-2007

Subject : Environment

Reported in : 2008(1)AWC938

3. A range case being Range Case No. 29 of 2004-05 was registered lender Section 26 of the Forest Act, 1927. The petitioner is the owner of the truck, who made an application before the Chief Judicial Magistrate who … of the truck whether he is willing to compound the offence at the value of truck as Rs. 70,000/-. The driver consented and deposited Rs. 1,000/-. The truck was confiscated since the value was not paid. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial