Advanced Search Results

M/S. Digamber Pershad Kirti Prasad Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Othe ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contract

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 4(3 and 4), 20 and 26; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 83(1); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1996All1

Sections 4(4), 20 and 26 of Sale of Goods Act, 1930, Section 83(1) of Forest Act, 1927 and Section 7 of Contract Act, 1872 - purchase of forest made in auction - purchaser after felling the trees collecting … retained by the seller, if full payment is not made. Sub-section (1) of Section 83 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is relevant. Sub-section (I) of Section 83 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 entitles the Forest Officer to

Janu Chandra Waghmare and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 31, 31-B, 31(2), 228A, 245, 246, 246(3), 248, 255, 301 to 307, 366, 367 and 368; Constitution of India (40th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(6), 2(7), 3, 4 to 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16, 16(1) and 17; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Sale of Trees by Occupants belonging to Scheduled Tribes (Regulation) Act, 1959 - Sections 5 and 6; Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 2(5), 2(6), 2(7), 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3

Reported in : AIR1978Bom119; (1977)79BOMLR499

was passed on 28-10-1974. On 14-5-1975 the State Government issued a notification under Section 35(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 in respect of the 1st petitioner's said private forest.4, Further, during the pendency of the petition the Maharashtra … vest in the State Government under Section 3 of the Act. In this behalf reference was made to Section 7 of the Act and the following sections which make a provision for payment of amount to the owners

K. Abdul Rahiman and ors. Vs. Divisional Forest Officer and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 79; Constitution of India - Article 299; Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1989Ker1

in the circumstances of the case, no costs. (i) Civil - right to adjudicate - Section 79 of Forest Act, 1927, Aritcle 299 of Constitution of India and Section 7 of Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968 - provisions allowing

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Aircrafts Act; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act 1888 - Sections 354A; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 4(1), 9 and 10(1); Cantonment Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5; Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 57; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 141, 226, 227, 245, 246, 246(1), 300A and 372(1); Development Control Regulations, 1991;Evidence Act - Sections 114; Forest Act, 1865 - Sections 34A and 38; Forest Act, 1878; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Government of India Act 1935; Greater Bombay Laws and the Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 1, 2, 2A, 3 to 26, 34., 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3), 35(4), 36, 36A, 36B, 36C, 37 and 38; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11A; Limitat

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

the individual petitions. The action proceeds on the basis that once notice under Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, hereinafter referred to as '1927 Act', is issued, any land in respect of which such notice has been … acquisition for private forest the holder shall be paid compensation in terms of a procedure set out in Section 7 of the Forest Act, 1975 no compensation has been paid to the holder of the said property nor

Harish Chandra Singh and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ba ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 9A(2); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 4, 6 and 20; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Article 372

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC562

Nos. 2, 45 and 41 are reserved forest. Notification under Sections 4, 6 and 20 under the Indian Forest Act, 1927, (hereinafter to be referred as the '1927 Act'), has been issued with regard to land recorded as forest … challenging the same order dated 25.6.2001 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Bareilly Camp at Shahjahanpur under Section 48 of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act and the order dated 15.1.2000 passed by the Settlement … filed in this Court which has been dismissed by the judgment dated 7.11.2001. The aforesaid writ petition was filed challenging the orders of the Deputy

Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 3 to 27, 28 and 29 to 34; Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953 - Sections 27; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 1 and 7(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 4 and 7(1); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Himachal Pradesh Private Forest Act, 1954 - Sections 4, 5, 6 and 11; Land Holdings Act, 1972; Evidence Act - Sections 92

Reported in : AIR1990SC1833; JT1990(3)SC215; 1990(2)SCALE95; (1990)4SCC320; [1990]3SCR469

the Act shall not apply to any land which is a reserved or protected forest under the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Section 4 empowers the State Government to prohibit by notification the cutting, felling, gridling, lopping, burning, stripping off the … the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh in Regular First Appeal No. 7 of 1970 arising out of Suit No. 11 of 1987. The appellant-original plaintiff-is the second son of late

Surinder Singh Brar and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 - Section 4; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Section 4; Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 - Sections 48(5); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 4(1), 5-A, 6, 7; Periphery Control Act, 1951; Chandigarh Allotment of Dwelling Units to the Oustees of Chandigarh Scheme, 1996

plan of the area, which included residential and commercial plots, preliminary notification under Section 4 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 was issued by the State Government on 28.2.1956 and final notification under Section 20 of that Act was … Acquisition Collector Chandigarh is hereby directed to take further action for the acquisition of the said land under Section 7 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.The plans of the land may be inspected in the office of Land

Mohd. Mokhtar Ahmad @ Mohd. Mokhtar Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

has not been notified as a reserved tree in the protected forest under Section 30 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) nor any rule has been framed under Section 32 of the Act … of Meda Bark (Chhal), a forest produce, illegally removed, were loaded in a Metador, bearing No. B.R. 14L 7454, in Palkot Mohalla of Gumla town for the purpose of selling in black market. On the said information

Karna Laxman Gawali and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(1), 2(3), 2(6), 2(7), 25, 26, 26(1), 52, 52(1), 55, 61-A, 61-A(3), 61(B), 61-D, 70 and 71; Indian Forest (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 61A to 61G; Cattle Trespass Act, 1871 - Sections 71

Reported in : (1989)91BOMLR134; 1990CriLJ163; 1989MhLJ780

Can the cattle instrumental in the commission of forest offence under S. 26(1)(d) and/or (f) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (the Act) be confiscated under S. 61-A(3) of the Act, is a point of some importance raised in … the second respondent for fresh inquiry. Accordingly fresh inquiry was also held, 7 persons were examined. The petitioners cross-examined them through a lawyer and also … seized under S. 52(1) to be confiscated under S. 61-A. The said order was challenged in appeal under Section 61-D before the Sessions Judge, who was pleased to remand the matter to the second respondent for fresh

Mahadeo S/O Rajaramji Mahadule and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 2(6) and 2(7)

Reported in : AIR2001Bom434; 2001(3)ALLMR72; 2001(3)MhLj379

forest produce within the meaning of Section 2(4)(b)(i) read with Section 2(6) and 2(7) of the Indian Forests Act, 1927.3. Our attention is drawn to a decision given by the Supreme Court in the case of Suresh Lohiya