Advanced Search Results

Uma Paliwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15; Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1986 - Rule 4; Rajasthan Forest Act, 1953; Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 - Sections 18, 19 to 25, 26A, 35 and 66(4); Constitution of India - Article 14; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Wildlife (Protection) (Amendment) Act, 1991; Forest Act, 1927; Forest (Amendment) Act, 1980; Forest Rules, 1981

Reported in : RLW2003(2)Raj1118

falling within the area declared Under Section 18 is not reserved forest area as declared under the Indian Forest Act. 1927 (for brevity 'old Forest Act'), nor proceedings Under Sections 19 to 25 were pending on the date of … has been finally notified as 'sanctuary' Under Section 26-A nor is it deemed sanctuary within the meaning of Section 66(4) because 'reserved forest' area falling within the area declared Under Section 18 is not reserved forest area as

State (Represented by Range Forest Officer) Vs. Shri Rajesh Gaonkar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 52(2), 53, 54, 55, 61-A and 69; Goa Amendment Act, 1988; Preservation of Tree Act, 1986 - Sections 66; Goa, Daman and Diu Forest Rules, 1964 - Rule 22

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR581

report of the circumstances to his superior officer.'The reference to sections in this Independent is to the Indian Forest Act, 1927 as amended by Goa Amendment Act, 1988. Section 53 provides for release of properties seized under section 52 … the offence, in question, is committed in private property without transit pass transportation of forest produce punishable under section 66 of Preservation of Tree Act, 1986 and Goa, Daman and Diu Forest Rules, 1964. He also relied upon

Kamleshkumar Chhabra Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 52 and 66; Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Kastha Niyam, 1973 - Rule 8

Reported in : AIR1985MP130; 1985MPLJ72

9(11) of the Madhya Pradesh Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Kastha Niyara, 1973, punishable under the provisions of the Forest Act, 1927. It is also contended that the very installation of the saw-mill itself was in violation of the provisions … admitted to have been sealed, the sealing is sought to be justified by the respondents in view of Section 66 of the Indian Forests Act, 1927. It is, therefore, contended that under the provisions of this Section in

State of Gujarat Vs. Rathod Manpritsinh Mahendrasinh

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CriminalEnvironment

Acts : Indian Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 52, 61(A), 61(B), 61(B)(2), 61(D), 61(D)(2), 66, 67 and 68; Limitation Act - Sections 5; Minimum Wages Act - Sections 20; Bombay Forest Rules, 1942 - Rule 66; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 320(8); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4052

that case, the Learned Sessions Judge failed to look to the relevant provisions of section 61(B) of the Forest Act while deciding the appeal. It has been further held that though under Article 227 of the Constitution of … hence the wood as well as the offending vehicle were seized under Section 52 of the Indian Forests Act, 1927 (for short 'the Act'). The driver and the cleaner of the vehicle fled away leaving the offending vehicle … because there is a specific contravention of Rule 66 of the Rules and that contravention is punishable under Section 66 of the Act. At the same time, this Court has also to take into consideration the order under

State of Maharashtra and Others Vs. Tukaram Yashwant Dindorle

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 4 and 52; Bombay Forest Rules, 1942 - Rule 66; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197 and 200; Maharashtra Law Officers (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 1984 - Rule 109; Maharashtra Felling of Tress Act 1964 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR533; 2000BomCR(Cri)533; 2000(1)MhLj388

prosecution by the forest officers charged with taking illegal action of attaching the property of complainant under the Forest Act and Rules, 1927 - It was disputed that the sanction in the case of private complaint was not … under section 4 of the Indian Forests Act read with the Rule 66 of the Bombay Forests Rules 1942 while transporting timber of forest produce. … the Forest Officers could make an application for their discharge on the ground of want of sanction under section 197 of Cr.P.C. in a private complaint filed against them for the alleged offence committed in discharge of

Afjal Imam. Vs. State of Bihar and Others.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Municipal Act, 2007 -Sections 21 (3), 27, 25(4), 17, 25 (4), 23 (3), 21 (3), 21 (4) ; atna Municipal Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 36, 20 (d), '; Howrah Act - Sections 6 (2), 7 (d) ; Calcutta Act - Section 8 (2), 9 (d)(e) ; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Section 37 ; M.P. and Chattisgarh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Section 70 ; Forest Act 1927 - Sections 52 (3)

of Jharkhand and Anr. v. Govind Singh, reported in 2005 (10) SCC 437, which was a case under Forest Act, 1927. The High Court had read into sections 52 (3) of the Act, the power to direct release of … Somewhat similar are the provisions under sections 52, 64 and 66 of the Goa Municipalities Act 1968. Under section 66 (1) of the Act, the term of office of the members of the Standing Committee is co-terminous with

In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands versus

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1480

Matched in: Judge BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI * , AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH 1480 : 2025 INSC 754 In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands [(I.A. No. 12465 of 2019 with I.A. No. 98194 of 2019, I.A. No. 127871 of 2020, I.A. No. 127874 of 2020, I.A. No. 44062 of 2025, I.A. No. 66986 and 74569 of 2025) In (Writ Petition (C) No. 202 of 1995)] In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of Issue pertains to the status of Zudpi Jungle or Zudpi Forest in the six districts of State of Maharashtra; and whether the recommendations made by the CEC in its 2025 Report should be accepted or not. …

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

reform came up for consideration. It was contended that the provisions of 1960 Act were repugnant to the Forest Act, 1927. Section 4A providing for vesting was introduced in the 1960 Act by amendment in the year 1978. On the … number, sharing or parcelling out, allotting, dispensing, apportioning." (p. 426) 90. Similarly, Webster's Third International Dictionary at p. 660 defines `distribution' thus: "the position, placement, or arrangement (as of a mass or the members of a group);

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … or demolition of such streets can only be undertaken by the Commissioner of the W.P.(C)No.365/2017 & FAO(OS)No.200/2017 Page 66 of 95 Municipal Corporation in conformity with the orders of the Standing Committee under Section 314 of the

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … or demolition of such streets can only be undertaken by the Commissioner of the W.P.(C)No.365/2017 & FAO(OS)No.200/2017 Page 66 of 95 Municipal Corporation in conformity with the orders of the Standing Committee under Section 314 of the