Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1927 section 65 · Page 1 of about 81 results (0.036 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 17 1995

Anil Shet Gaonkar Vs. Abdulla Khan Karol and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-17-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197, 200, 397 and 482; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 54 and 65; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 341, 348 and 349

Reported in : 1996(5)BomCR441

respect of persons and property involved in the offence. He took me through the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 particularly sections 50, 52, 62, 64 and also 65. These provisions make it amply clear that those powers … Indian Forest Act gives power to a forest officer to arrest a person without a warrant. So also section 65 gives power to the forest officer to release on bond a person arrested and section 68 gives a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2014

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-17-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

reform came up for consideration. It was contended that the provisions of 1960 Act were repugnant to the Forest Act, 1927. Section 4A providing for vesting was introduced in the 1960 Act by amendment in the year 1978. On the … both the above judgments in paragraphs 61 and 62, the following was laid down in paragraphs 64 and 65 of the judgment:"4. If it is to be contended that Kaiser lays down the proposition that there can

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2012

Rajender Kumar Son of Sh. Hitender Kumar Vs. State of Hp Through Secre ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-05-2012

Subject : Education

Wildlife Divisions in Himachal Pradesh have been notified as Rs.authorized officers under sub-section(1) of section 52A of Indian Forest Act, 1927 (Himachal Amendment) (for short, Act). It has been stated that police has not completed the investigation and challan … pulses and 5 cans of refined oil and 12 other bags. A permit was issued for vehicle No.HP- 65-6363 in the name of Prem another accused in the case. In both the trucks for carrying red sanders

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 24 1965

U.R. Mavinkurve Vs. Thakor Madhavsinghji Gambhirsingh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-24-1965

Subject : Property

Acts : Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Jagirs Abolition Act - Sections 2(2), 5, 8, 9 and 11; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 10 and 34(A); Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 3(16), 3(17), 3(19) and 40; Bombay Act, 1865; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1965SC1747; [1965]3SCR177

of individuals legally subsisting. .....................................'9. Section 9 reads : '9. The rights to trees specially reserved under theIndian Forest Act, 1927, or any other law for the time being in force, exceptthose the ownership of which has been transferred … shall be preserved ordisposed of in such manner as the State Government may from time to timedirect.' 15. Section 65 states : '65. An occupant of land assessed or held for thepurpose of agriculture is entitled by himself,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2013

Ramendra Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-07-2013

Subject : Education

as Dumpers bearing registration not MP26-D/3150 and MP23-D/5004 under Section 26 (1), 30 and 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 read with Section 2 (2) of the Forest 2 Conservation Act, 1980. 03. The undisputed facts are that … granted. 09. No application has been made for permission to produce the secondary evidence, which is required under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, which reads as follows :-“65. Cases in which secondary evidence relating to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2006

Rohit Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar (Now State of Jharkhand) and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-17-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29; Bihar Land Reforms Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 and 105(1) - Order 1, Rule 10(2) - Order 8, Rules 1, 6A, 6E and 9

Reported in : AIR2007SC10; 2006(6)ALT45(SC); 2007(1)AWC1(SC); (SCSuppl)2007(1)CHN44; JT2006(9)SC145; 2007(I)OLR(SC)266; (2007)146PLR790; 2006(10)SCALE258; 2006(2)LC1363(SC)

They pleaded that the property was vested forest having been notified as such under Section 29 of the Forest Act, 1927, which remained vested in the State; that the plaintiff had no cause of action and that the suit

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

03/01/1977. Earlier, the subject, Forest was in Entry 19 of List II i.e., the State List. The Indian Forest Act, 1927 (Central Act), which is a Pre-Constitution statute was in force in British India. It replaced the Indian Forest … etc., This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to declare that section 98a of the Karnataka Forest Act 1993 and notification dt. 16.8.2008 published in the Official Gazette on 27.8.2008 … List I read with the Industries Development and Regulation Act, 1951 (Act 65 of 1951). The levy was defended as a fee relatable to Entries

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Education

03/01/1977. Earlier, the subject, "Forest" was in Entry 19 of List II i.e., the State List. The Indian Forest Act, 1927 (Central Act), which is a Pre- Constitution statute was in force in British India. It replaced the Indian … & R.2) ***** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION98 OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT1993AND NOTIFICATION DT. 16.8.2008 PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE ON278.2008 VIDE ANNEXURE B DOES

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1977

Janu Chandra Waghmare and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-14-1977

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 31, 31-B, 31(2), 228A, 245, 246, 246(3), 248, 255, 301 to 307, 366, 367 and 368; Constitution of India (40th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(6), 2(7), 3, 4 to 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 24; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16, 16(1) and 17; Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Sale of Trees by Occupants belonging to Scheduled Tribes (Regulation) Act, 1959 - Sections 5 and 6; Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 2(5), 2(6), 2(7), 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3

Reported in : AIR1978Bom119; (1977)79BOMLR499

was passed on 28-10-1974. On 14-5-1975 the State Government issued a notification under Section 35(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 in respect of the 1st petitioner's said private forest.4, Further, during the pendency of the petition the Maharashtra … II deals with education and runs thus: 'Education including universities subject to the provisions of Entries 63, 64, 65, 66 of List I and Entry 25 of List III'. The expression 'education including universities' occurring in this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2018

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-24-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … Page 10 of 95 that there was no order directing walling up of land/khasras including Khasra Nos.634 or 651 or 649 etc. of Neb Sarai located adjacent to the subject road which have been demarcated as forest

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial