Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1927 section 63 · Page 1 of about 89 results (0.022 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 24 2001

Anand Kumar Goenka Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-24-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Sections 3, 3(2) and 4; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 33 and 63; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 4, 4(2), 5, 200 and 245; Madhya Pradesh Transit Rules - Rules 3 and 29; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 41 and 42

Reported in : 2001(3)MPHT252; 2001(3)MPLJ272

that the Forest Range Officer, Maihar investigated the offences punishable under Sections 33 and 63 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (for short 'the Forest Act') and the offences punishable under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of … in Criminal Case No. 12/97.2. It appears that the Forest Range Officer, Maihar investigated the offences punishable under Sections 33 and 63 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (for short 'the Forest Act') and the offences punishable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2007

Vidarbha Chambers of Commerce and Industries, a Association of Traders ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-03-2007

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 63(18), 124, 124(1)(2), 127, 142, 147, 148C, 466 and 466(1)(A); Societies Registration Act, 1860; Forest Act, 1927; U.P. Transit of Timber and Other Forest Produce Rules, 1978 - Rules 2, 5 and 26; Constitution of India - Articles 147 and 226; Karnataka Municipalities Act

Reported in : 2007(4)BomCR536; 2007(4)MhLj82

considered provisions of Rule 5 of U.P. Transit of Timber and Other Forest Produce Rules, 1978, framed under Forest Act, 1927. The Hon'ble Apex Court was considering challenge to transit fee and it has been observed that Rule 5 … and setting aside of relevant provisions of Standing Orders framed by Respondent No. 1 under the provisions of Section 466(1)(A)(f) of Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). As the necessary facts … recovered from other users of roads. Moreover Section 148C read with Section 63(18) enable Municipal Corporation to levy street tax for said purpose on lands

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2004

State of Jharkhand and anr. Vs. Govind Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-03-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 26, 33, 52, 52(3), 52(4), 52(5), 63 and 68; Bihar Forest (Amendment) Act, 1990; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2005SC294; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)398; 2004(52)BLJR2340; [2005(1)JCR1(SC)]; JT2004(10)SC349; 2005(1)KLT34(SC); 2004(10)SCALE174; (2005)10SCC437

Court at Ranchi holding that even though there was no specific provision in Section 52(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (in short the 'Act') as amended by Bihar Act 9 of 1990 (hereafter referred to as the 'Bihar … suspicion exists that he has committed any forest offence, other than an offence specified in Section 62 or Section 63, a sum of money by way of compensation for the offence which such person is suspected to have

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 24 1993

Pijush Kanti Mondal Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-24-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 401, 402 and 482; ;Indian Forest Act, 1972 - Sections 52, 59A, 59B, 62, 63 and 68; ;Orissa Forest Act, 1972 - Section 56(2)

Reported in : (1993)2CALLT252(HC),97CWN875

Court decision in Gurudeb Singh Rai (supra), therefore does not apply in interpreting Section 59-A of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Section 59-A will therefore have to be read as it is without adding anything thereto or substracting anything therefrom. … money by way of compensation for any forest offence other than an offence specified in Section 62 or Section 63 which the person concerned is suspected to have committed and also to release the seized property where such

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 1989

Kalasami Venkanna and ors. Vs. the Secretary, Govt. of A.P. Forest Dep ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-03-1989

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 - Sections 11, 15, 63 and 63A; Andhra Pradesh Forest Act - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 7, 7(1) and 20; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1992(1)ALT705

Act are analogous to Sections 4 and 7 of the A.P. Forest Act. Section 5 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is analogous to Section 7 of the A.P. Forest Act. Section 26 of the Indian Forest Act which … time claimed that the land is situated in reserved forest. They contend that applications filed by them under Section 63-A of the A.P. (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and Coversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 are still pending before the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2004

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Sujit Kumar Rana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-20-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(3), 20, 29, 44(2A), 49(7), 50A to 59G, 62, 63, 67 and 68; Constitution of India - Articles 48A, 51A, 136, 226 and 300A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 6A(2), 6C, 6E and 7(1); Karnataka Forest Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR2004SC1851; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)258; (2004)3CALLT55(SC); [2004(4)JCR137(SC)]; JT2004(5)SC157; 2004(1)SCALE641; (2004)4SCC129

of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing a proceeding for confiscation of forest-produce etc. under the provisions of Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') as amended by the State of West Bengal is in question in … reasonable suspicion exists that he has committed any forest-offence, other than an offence specified in Section 62 or Section 63, a sum of money by way of compensation for the offence which such person is suspected to have

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 2005

Smt. Pratima Ghosh and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-23-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention or Damages of Public Property Act, 1934 - Section 3 ; ;Forest Act, 1927 - Section 17, 52, 59A to 59G, 60, 62, 63 and 68; ;West Bengal Forest Produce Transit Rules, 1959 - Rule 11; ;Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226 and 227; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397, 401 and 482

Reported in : (2006)2CALLT125(HC),2006(2)CHN586

contending that since the order passed by the learned District Judge in appeal under Section 59D(2) of the Forest Act, 1927, as amended by the W.B. Act 22 of 1988, is final, revision under Section 401 Cr.PC is not … reasonable suspicion exists that he has committed any forest-offence, other than an offence specified in Section 62 or Section 63, a sum of money by way of compensation for the offence which such person is suspected to have

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2017

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-15-2017

Subject : Right to Information

1927 Act. The Indian Forest Act, 1927 72 is a pre­constitutional legislation enacted by Indian legislature as per Section 63 of Government of India Act, 1915. 1927 Act was the law enforced in the territory of India immediately … and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by different States. State of U.P. has framed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2018

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-24-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … 15 to16) III. Claim of Gokul Kumar and others by way of CM No.22628/2017 & proceedings in WP(C) 6324/2017 (paras 17 to21) W.P.(C)No.365/2017 & FAO(OS)No.200/2017 Page 4 of 95 IV. V. The declaration of the Ridge and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2018

Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-24-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

the private parties (paras 96 to101) XI. Objection of the plaintiffs premised on Section 25 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (paras 102 to115) XII. Whether the constructions in question are covered under the Regulations for Regularization of Unauthorized … 15 to16) III. Claim of Gokul Kumar and others by way of CM No.22628/2017 & proceedings in WP(C) 6324/2017 (paras 17 to21) W.P.(C)No.365/2017 & FAO(OS)No.200/2017 Page 4 of 95 IV. V. The declaration of the Ridge and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial