Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: forest act 1927 section 61 · Page 1 of about 115 results (0.021 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 18 2008

Mohd. Ashique Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-18-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 52(2), 61, 61A, 61B, 61B(2), 61C, 61D, 61E, 61F, 61G and 69; Constitution of India - Articles 48A, 51A, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2008AIRSCW7783; AIR2009SC624; [2009(1)JCR165(SC)]; RLW2009(2)SC2006; (2009)1SCC368; 2009(91)SCC(Cri)502.

order of confiscation passed by the Assistant Conservator of Forest (Authorised Officer) under Section 61-A of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (in short the `Act'). The truck was found involved in forest offence on 7.1.1999. It was found that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2003

The State of Bihar and anr. Vs. Kedar Sao and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-25-2003

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment) Act, 1990 - Sections 2(3), 2(4), 5, 6, 32, 33(1), 41, 41(1), 42, 42(1), 52, 52(3), 52(4), 52(5), 52A, 52B, 52C, 52D, 53C, 55 and 61; Bihar Forest Produce (Regulation of Trade) Act, 1984 - Sections 1(3), 1(4), 14, 15, 17, 20, 21, 28 and 32; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29(2) and 30; Bihar Timber and other Forest Produce Regulation of Transit Rules, 1973; Bihar Kendu Leaves (Control of Trade) Act, 1973; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 102 and 103; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Fruit Products Order, 1955

Reported in : AIR2003SC3650; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)670; 2003CriLJ4903; JT2003(7)SC276; 2003(6)SCALE639; (2004)9SCC344

to the case by virtue of Section 32 of the said Act and the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 stood excluded and consequently the Authorities under the central enactment had no powers to confiscate the vehicle and … jurisdiction shall operate on all such Courts.(2) Nothing in Sub-section (1) shall affect the power saved under section 61.13. Section 52-D, inserted by Section 6 of the Amendment Act, empowers the Officers enumerated therein to enter, inspect,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 2014

Bhagwandas Vs. Government of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jun-12-2014

Subject : Education

of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 61(D) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as '1927 Act'), the petitioner, an owner of saw mill, challenges the judgment dated 7.3.1998

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 20 2008

Mangal S/O. Balasaheb Deshmane Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Distri ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-20-2008

Subject : CriminalEnvironment

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 61A, 61B, 61B(2) and 61D

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR2814

confiscated.3. Being aggrieved by the order of confiscation, an appeal as provided under Section 61-D of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (For short, 'the Act'), was filed by the present petitioner. The same is also dismissed. Hence, the present

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 1995

Camilo M.F. Fernandes Vs. the State of Goa, Through Its Chief Secretar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-13-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 61A(2) and 61B; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 374

Reported in : 1996(4)BomCR154; (1995)97BOMLR97

to show cause as to why his vehicle should not be confiscated under section 61-A(2) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 as amended by the Goa Amendment Act, 1988. Nowhere in the show cause notice it has been alleged

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 1996

KamaruddIn N. Shaikh Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-11-1996

Subject : ConstitutionProperty

Acts : Indian Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 35(3); Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2 and 5; Evidence Act, 1872, Sections 3, 58 and 61; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1996(4)BomCR209; (1996)98BOMLR159

1996. Property - forest land - Section 35 (3) of Indian Forests Act, 1927, Sections 3, 58 and 61 of Evidence Act, 1872 and Article 226 of Constitution of India - Court to decide suit land is … with forest produce. 'Forest produce' is not defined in the Act but has been defined under the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Section 2(4) reads as under :'2(4) 'forest-produce' includes ---(a) the following whether found in, or brought from, a forest

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 1991

State of Maharashtra and anr. Vs. Kisan Genu Pawar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-16-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 52 and 61A

Reported in : 1991(2)BomCR167

the subject matter of the commission of an offence, provided, the ingredients of section 61-A of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 are satisfied. Normally, the vehicles that are the subject matter of an order of confiscation are the vehicles

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2005

State of Gujarat Vs. Dhansukhlal Amrutlal Purohit

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-30-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 61, 62 and 71

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2647

of the Maruti Car.4. The ld. Sessions Judge has considered the scheme of Section 61 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, as amended in the year 1983. It is not the finding that no offence punishable under the Forest

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 1999

State (Represented by Range Forest Officer) Vs. Shri Rajesh Gaonkar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-22-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 52(2), 53, 54, 55, 61-A and 69; Goa Amendment Act, 1988; Preservation of Tree Act, 1986 - Sections 66; Goa, Daman and Diu Forest Rules, 1964 - Rule 22

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR581

report of the circumstances to his superior officer.'The reference to sections in this Independent is to the Indian Forest Act, 1927 as amended by Goa Amendment Act, 1988. Section 53 provides for release of properties seized under section 52 … by the Deputy Conservator of Forests as to why the vehicle in question should not be confiscated under section 61(A), Clause 2 of the Indian Forest Act, as amended by Goa Amendment. An application for release of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2001

State of Gujarat Vs. Rathod Manpritsinh Mahendrasinh

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-17-2001

Subject : CriminalEnvironment

Acts : Indian Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 52, 61(A), 61(B), 61(B)(2), 61(D), 61(D)(2), 66, 67 and 68; Limitation Act - Sections 5; Minimum Wages Act - Sections 20; Bombay Forest Rules, 1942 - Rule 66; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 320(8); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4052

that case, the Learned Sessions Judge failed to look to the relevant provisions of section 61(B) of the Forest Act while deciding the appeal. It has been further held that though under Article 227 of the Constitution of … hence the wood as well as the offending vehicle were seized under Section 52 of the Indian Forests Act, 1927 (for short 'the Act'). The driver and the cleaner of the vehicle fled away leaving the offending vehicle

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial